|this is a prime example of someone who one can follow and NOT bash just because people like him shall allow us to study under a microscope. Yes he is in his early 20s, but it's not wise to say you have a certain set of picks in progress at a time that look like clear winners. Not only does he set himself up to get bashed should those picks end up losing and i'm not saying that evil people should be allowed out of jail for killing someone 40 years prior but to me it's the job of media/social personnel of anyone being looked up upon to claim a loss that may or may not have been posted prior. This to me is called consistency and helps build credibility because a guy who's always seemingly enough always winning is NOT reality. On top of this anyone having a defensive attitude towards those who are bashing towards him is also a tell-tale sign just because real winners are going to have losses and losing streaks. Why feel the need to defend yourself? Do you not realize that a 54% success rate can equal to a good living if you can do so for that 1 year and one year alone? What about a 40% success rate on alternate underdog run lines for a single season of baseball alone?
Posted: 7/4/2012 6:07:16 PM
No need to even follow him to start bashing him for one bit, instead follow him to start getting to know him over a period of time to know exactly what i am talking about. It's obvious that he is not properly trained and maybe it does seem like a wise man can intervene. I myself feel the need to exploit him directly but then i realize that people like him exist on all walks of gambling whether we don't know the person playing at the black jack tables or not, the fact of the matter is that we all must have once thought like he did in our past one way or another.
I have never heard of someone who would "pick" a certain side to win on the big stage yet "bet" the other side because of the big value because of payout should a win occur. This can get a lot of people very confused but more importantly very angry. On the intelligent side of things yes i can understand how betting a side before the game starts at +250 odds and then say at halftime get +165 odds on the opposite team can yield a good profit on the game no matter who ends up winning but for the most part too many people are not able to understand this let alone what books offer live in-game betting.
I always wondered why people like oj simpson are allowed to live but it's no wonder to me anymore. Years passed along which allowed us to study him and the people involved in the case. We were allowed to come to many conclusions years after the case and that to me is gold. Yep just just like people on this forum, and on twitter are like gold & platinum.