how can anyone say implied numbers at this point are sharp or not...this will be week 1...no one truly knows what a "sharp" line will be...
Washington lost a good QB, an elite RB, and an elite TE...but they have solid grunts coming back on both sides of the ball, and Petersen TCB'd (unlike others) when his Boise teams went to the Islands ATS...
I think the key factor here will be the play of the Washington QB Cyler Miles. Washington scored 69 points at Oregon St in the 2nd to the last game...how many points will a motivated Coach Peterson want to put on Hawaii???
how can anyone say implied numbers at this point are sharp or not...this will be week 1...no one truly knows what a "sharp" line will be...
Washington lost a good QB, an elite RB, and an elite TE...but they have solid grunts coming back on both sides of the ball, and Petersen TCB'd (unlike others) when his Boise teams went to the Islands ATS...
I think the key factor here will be the play of the Washington QB Cyler Miles. Washington scored 69 points at Oregon St in the 2nd to the last game...how many points will a motivated Coach Peterson want to put on Hawaii???
how can anyone say implied numbers at this point are sharp or not...this will be week 1...no one truly knows what a "sharp" line will be...
Washington lost a good QB, an elite RB, and an elite TE...but they have solid grunts coming back on both sides of the ball, and Petersen TCB'd (unlike others) when his Boise teams went to the Islands ATS...
I think the key factor here will be the play of the Washington QB Cyler Miles. Washington scored 69 points at Oregon St in the 2nd to the last game...how many points will a motivated Coach Peterson want to put on Hawaii???
how can anyone say implied numbers at this point are sharp or not...this will be week 1...no one truly knows what a "sharp" line will be...
Washington lost a good QB, an elite RB, and an elite TE...but they have solid grunts coming back on both sides of the ball, and Petersen TCB'd (unlike others) when his Boise teams went to the Islands ATS...
I think the key factor here will be the play of the Washington QB Cyler Miles. Washington scored 69 points at Oregon St in the 2nd to the last game...how many points will a motivated Coach Peterson want to put on Hawaii???
wise, just because someone estimates a theoretical MOV v. the line does not make it a sharp line...it just means that theoretical perception is line with the books. I could mid to late season when there are a lot of data points, for the teams in the matchup. But, in week 1...most of the so called sharps and the books won't be sharp in week1, due to the unknowns...you can estimate, but, I believe week 1 and week 2 demonstrate a high degree of variability of outcomes. its all a best guess. as you have pointed out in previous years, the lines get sharp and refined by week 4, and makes are endeavor to cap games more difficult. But, again, in the early part of the season, and especially week 1, utilizing terms and phrases like "it is very sharp" is just pure speculation and nothing sharp about it...
with regard to this matchup, I think Washington has a good chance to cover if the line is -21...but, like you, I see more value elsewhere, so it will probably be a pass for me, too...
wise, just because someone estimates a theoretical MOV v. the line does not make it a sharp line...it just means that theoretical perception is line with the books. I could mid to late season when there are a lot of data points, for the teams in the matchup. But, in week 1...most of the so called sharps and the books won't be sharp in week1, due to the unknowns...you can estimate, but, I believe week 1 and week 2 demonstrate a high degree of variability of outcomes. its all a best guess. as you have pointed out in previous years, the lines get sharp and refined by week 4, and makes are endeavor to cap games more difficult. But, again, in the early part of the season, and especially week 1, utilizing terms and phrases like "it is very sharp" is just pure speculation and nothing sharp about it...
with regard to this matchup, I think Washington has a good chance to cover if the line is -21...but, like you, I see more value elsewhere, so it will probably be a pass for me, too...
wise, just because someone estimates a theoretical MOV v. the line does not make it a sharp line...it just means that theoretical perception is line with the books. I could mid to late season when there are a lot of data points, for the teams in the matchup. But, in week 1...most of the so called sharps and the books won't be sharp in week1, due to the unknowns...you can estimate, but, I believe week 1 and week 2 demonstrate a high degree of variability of outcomes. its all a best guess. as you have pointed out in previous years, the lines get sharp and refined by week 4, and makes are endeavor to cap games more difficult. But, again, in the early part of the season, and especially week 1, utilizing terms and phrases like "it is very sharp" is just pure speculation and nothing sharp about it...
with regard to this matchup, I think Washington has a good chance to cover if the line is -21...but, like you, I see more value elsewhere, so it will probably be a pass for me, too...
wise, just because someone estimates a theoretical MOV v. the line does not make it a sharp line...it just means that theoretical perception is line with the books. I could mid to late season when there are a lot of data points, for the teams in the matchup. But, in week 1...most of the so called sharps and the books won't be sharp in week1, due to the unknowns...you can estimate, but, I believe week 1 and week 2 demonstrate a high degree of variability of outcomes. its all a best guess. as you have pointed out in previous years, the lines get sharp and refined by week 4, and makes are endeavor to cap games more difficult. But, again, in the early part of the season, and especially week 1, utilizing terms and phrases like "it is very sharp" is just pure speculation and nothing sharp about it...
with regard to this matchup, I think Washington has a good chance to cover if the line is -21...but, like you, I see more value elsewhere, so it will probably be a pass for me, too...
how can anyone say implied numbers at this point are sharp or not...this will be week 1...no one truly knows what a "sharp" line will be...
Washington lost a good QB, an elite RB, and an elite TE...but they have solid grunts coming back on both sides of the ball, and Petersen TCB'd (unlike others) when his Boise teams went to the Islands ATS...
I think the key factor here will be the play of the Washington QB Cyler Miles. Washington scored 69 points at Oregon St in the 2nd to the last game...how many points will a motivated Coach Peterson want to put on Hawaii???
how can anyone say implied numbers at this point are sharp or not...this will be week 1...no one truly knows what a "sharp" line will be...
Washington lost a good QB, an elite RB, and an elite TE...but they have solid grunts coming back on both sides of the ball, and Petersen TCB'd (unlike others) when his Boise teams went to the Islands ATS...
I think the key factor here will be the play of the Washington QB Cyler Miles. Washington scored 69 points at Oregon St in the 2nd to the last game...how many points will a motivated Coach Peterson want to put on Hawaii???
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.