About 10 bucks...the only CFB / NFL magazine designed for gamblers *no Steele is not
All teams in alphabetical order.... *schedules with ATS records going back 10 years
Tons of technical stuff for virtually every situation.... *even plenty of NFL pre-season stuff
A great quick reference for both CFB and NFL....with RELIABLE info.....done with humor / style as well........ *especially his photo....airbrushing even Playboy would be jealous of......
note: the delay this year in these magazines getting out is due to one of the largest magazine distributors going out of business.................after losing TIME account it seems
Humble when ambitious - gracious when successful - resilient when you fail.
About 10 bucks...the only CFB / NFL magazine designed for gamblers *no Steele is not
All teams in alphabetical order.... *schedules with ATS records going back 10 years
Tons of technical stuff for virtually every situation.... *even plenty of NFL pre-season stuff
A great quick reference for both CFB and NFL....with RELIABLE info.....done with humor / style as well........ *especially his photo....airbrushing even Playboy would be jealous of......
note: the delay this year in these magazines getting out is due to one of the largest magazine distributors going out of business.................after losing TIME account it seems
Some data on coaches from Playbook * notice how the same names (especially one in particular) keep popping up... *all numbers ATS......and mean maybe more than you might think
This technical stuff is usually underrated really.... *what it tells you is this....
How has a team performed historically....relative to the PUBLIC'S perception (the closing number)....in a specific situation....? *patterns are clear....and shouldn't be ignored
If a team has done well ATS.....either they are consistently underrated by the PUBLIC....are better prepared....or both *makes no difference
HOME Briles 23-10 Cutcliffe 20-13 Ferentz 53-36 Snyder 77-41 Minn 12-6 Gundy 31-20 Bailiff 24-15 Spurrier 33-21 Hauck 17-6
Miles 24-32 DANTONIO 18-26 Niumatalolo 8-15 Fitzgerald 17-28 London 6-17
Some data on coaches from Playbook * notice how the same names (especially one in particular) keep popping up... *all numbers ATS......and mean maybe more than you might think
This technical stuff is usually underrated really.... *what it tells you is this....
How has a team performed historically....relative to the PUBLIC'S perception (the closing number)....in a specific situation....? *patterns are clear....and shouldn't be ignored
If a team has done well ATS.....either they are consistently underrated by the PUBLIC....are better prepared....or both *makes no difference
HOME Briles 23-10 Cutcliffe 20-13 Ferentz 53-36 Snyder 77-41 Minn 12-6 Gundy 31-20 Bailiff 24-15 Spurrier 33-21 Hauck 17-6
Miles 24-32 DANTONIO 18-26 Niumatalolo 8-15 Fitzgerald 17-28 London 6-17
BA, I'm hopeful to get MSU+ 14 1/2. If it's 13 1/2 , I'd probably pass.on it.
BA
can't wait for that one....
here 's ML's website.....
https://www.playbook.com/
*most of the good stuff under 'betting tools'
you can get his magazine in the same spots as the others.... *being a 'gambling' publication....it's sometimes harder to find (hidden in back shelves)
BTW.....to answer the technical betting naysayers.... I'm not recommending using this kinda stuff as your sole method for picking winners....but maybe to suggest a play....maybe call one off.....maybe help decide if only leaning
eg like Navy as a HOME FAVORITE? you better think twice....if playing a strong road dog also maybe better move on
Like the Ducks to kill Michigan St?....better watch out Dantonio should have his team ready
Considering betting against Kan St?..... *esp in Big 12 play.....better have a damm good reason
Humble when ambitious - gracious when successful - resilient when you fail.
BA, I'm hopeful to get MSU+ 14 1/2. If it's 13 1/2 , I'd probably pass.on it.
BA
can't wait for that one....
here 's ML's website.....
https://www.playbook.com/
*most of the good stuff under 'betting tools'
you can get his magazine in the same spots as the others.... *being a 'gambling' publication....it's sometimes harder to find (hidden in back shelves)
BTW.....to answer the technical betting naysayers.... I'm not recommending using this kinda stuff as your sole method for picking winners....but maybe to suggest a play....maybe call one off.....maybe help decide if only leaning
eg like Navy as a HOME FAVORITE? you better think twice....if playing a strong road dog also maybe better move on
Like the Ducks to kill Michigan St?....better watch out Dantonio should have his team ready
Considering betting against Kan St?..... *esp in Big 12 play.....better have a damm good reason
you can get his magazine in the same spots as the others.... *being a 'gambling' publication....it's sometimes harder to find (hidden in back shelves)
BTW.....to answer the technical betting naysayers.... I'm not recommending using this kinda stuff as your sole method for picking winners....but maybe to suggest a play....maybe call one off.....maybe help decide if only leaning
eg like Navy as a HOME FAVORITE? you better think twice....if playing a strong road dog also maybe better move on
Like the Ducks to kill Michigan St?....better watch out Dantonio should have his team ready
Considering betting against Kan St?..... *esp in Big 12 play.....better have a damm good reason
BA, I'll send you a PM on this tomorrow. I don't think that most bettors weigh multiple sources of capping info because they are unable or unwilling to validate the relative importance of a data point to their overall conclusion. Good data points = good decisions.
BA
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
you can get his magazine in the same spots as the others.... *being a 'gambling' publication....it's sometimes harder to find (hidden in back shelves)
BTW.....to answer the technical betting naysayers.... I'm not recommending using this kinda stuff as your sole method for picking winners....but maybe to suggest a play....maybe call one off.....maybe help decide if only leaning
eg like Navy as a HOME FAVORITE? you better think twice....if playing a strong road dog also maybe better move on
Like the Ducks to kill Michigan St?....better watch out Dantonio should have his team ready
Considering betting against Kan St?..... *esp in Big 12 play.....better have a damm good reason
BA, I'll send you a PM on this tomorrow. I don't think that most bettors weigh multiple sources of capping info because they are unable or unwilling to validate the relative importance of a data point to their overall conclusion. Good data points = good decisions.
Lawrence (a Covers expert BTW) does just fine with this method *his system.....I'm guessing)......revolves around a a massive data base.....that tells him when a team has a significant technical advantage over an opponent....and then if match-up and situational factors agree.....he has a play .
Humble when ambitious - gracious when successful - resilient when you fail.
Lawrence (a Covers expert BTW) does just fine with this method *his system.....I'm guessing)......revolves around a a massive data base.....that tells him when a team has a significant technical advantage over an opponent....and then if match-up and situational factors agree.....he has a play .
you can get his magazine in the same spots as the others.... *being a 'gambling' publication....it's sometimes harder to find (hidden in back shelves)
BTW.....to answer the technical betting naysayers.... I'm not recommending using this kinda stuff as your sole method for picking winners....but maybe to suggest a play....maybe call one off.....maybe help decide if only leaning
eg like Navy as a HOME FAVORITE? you better think twice....if playing a strong road dog also maybe better move on
Like the Ducks to kill Michigan St?....better watch out Dantonio should have his team ready
Considering betting against Kan St?..... *esp in Big 12 play.....better have a damm good reason
Hey Bud, You forget , I'm in Las Vegas right now. They don't hide gambling publications here.
BA
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
you can get his magazine in the same spots as the others.... *being a 'gambling' publication....it's sometimes harder to find (hidden in back shelves)
BTW.....to answer the technical betting naysayers.... I'm not recommending using this kinda stuff as your sole method for picking winners....but maybe to suggest a play....maybe call one off.....maybe help decide if only leaning
eg like Navy as a HOME FAVORITE? you better think twice....if playing a strong road dog also maybe better move on
Like the Ducks to kill Michigan St?....better watch out Dantonio should have his team ready
Considering betting against Kan St?..... *esp in Big 12 play.....better have a damm good reason
Hey Bud, You forget , I'm in Las Vegas right now. They don't hide gambling publications here.
Lawrence (a Covers expert BTW) does just fine with this method *his system.....I'm guessing)......revolves around a a massive data base.....that tells him when a team has a significant technical advantage over an opponent....and then if match-up and situational factors agree.....he has a play .
I'm a position by position , scheme vs scheme analyst type.If I am able to do the proper due diligence , there's a good chance that I'll have a fairly accurate indication of who will win and how much they will win by. But I really believe that information such as ML provides will keep the average handicapper from " forcing " a bad play because it mitigates the " homer " tendency in all of us and It is one additional weapon in our arsenal. Good stuff BA. I appreciate the effort you put out to keep all informed.
BA
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
Lawrence (a Covers expert BTW) does just fine with this method *his system.....I'm guessing)......revolves around a a massive data base.....that tells him when a team has a significant technical advantage over an opponent....and then if match-up and situational factors agree.....he has a play .
I'm a position by position , scheme vs scheme analyst type.If I am able to do the proper due diligence , there's a good chance that I'll have a fairly accurate indication of who will win and how much they will win by. But I really believe that information such as ML provides will keep the average handicapper from " forcing " a bad play because it mitigates the " homer " tendency in all of us and It is one additional weapon in our arsenal. Good stuff BA. I appreciate the effort you put out to keep all informed.
If Sparty is a 2 TD underdog, specifically 14, I will not be able to pass on that and would gladly drink a little juice to buy that half point to 14 if opening at 13.5. Just looking @ Oregon's record against out of conference foes makes me a little leery, but not enough to not grab a line like that.
Quack Attack have won 38 of last 41 at Autzen and have only lost 2 games out of conference since 1995, which were against the Mighty Hoosiers in 2004 and the Smurfs in 08 I believe. Both games were filled with turnovers and missed field goals for Ducks, but hard to gauge with the way team is built now against historical match ups vs quality B10 opponents they have faced, which includes MSU multiple times. Much different team, but again I would take the dawg here at 14 for a small amount no doubt. Thanks again BA
If Sparty is a 2 TD underdog, specifically 14, I will not be able to pass on that and would gladly drink a little juice to buy that half point to 14 if opening at 13.5. Just looking @ Oregon's record against out of conference foes makes me a little leery, but not enough to not grab a line like that.
Quack Attack have won 38 of last 41 at Autzen and have only lost 2 games out of conference since 1995, which were against the Mighty Hoosiers in 2004 and the Smurfs in 08 I believe. Both games were filled with turnovers and missed field goals for Ducks, but hard to gauge with the way team is built now against historical match ups vs quality B10 opponents they have faced, which includes MSU multiple times. Much different team, but again I would take the dawg here at 14 for a small amount no doubt. Thanks again BA
I have tried to order ML online. They must have some issues, because everytime I tried to order and pay, it would error out. I guess I need to call the number.
I have tried to order ML online. They must have some issues, because everytime I tried to order and pay, it would error out. I guess I need to call the number.
Wise - what do you think about Coker's road record ATS per above? I have some concerns about Houston week 1 ATS that I am evaluating.
LH, If you look hard enough you'll find data points that support either side of a wager.Those are no picks for me.I look for props that confirm my assessment . If the data does not confirm, I move on to the next. There are weeks when I do not find any to wager on.That's where discipline comes in.
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
Wise - what do you think about Coker's road record ATS per above? I have some concerns about Houston week 1 ATS that I am evaluating.
LH, If you look hard enough you'll find data points that support either side of a wager.Those are no picks for me.I look for props that confirm my assessment . If the data does not confirm, I move on to the next. There are weeks when I do not find any to wager on.That's where discipline comes in.
Wise - what do you think about Coker's road record ATS per above? I have some concerns about Houston week 1 ATS that I am evaluating.
LH , I know you were very positive about UH early , and now you have concerns. That's a healthy approach. I have a recommendation for you : 1. Generate a list of 10 things that must be present for you to make a wager on a prop.Do not settle for 9 2. Perform your " due diligence " to find how many props fit your criteria. 3. Refine the list to select the best 5 that are likely to meet your expectation. 4. Then, and only then, select the opportunities that offer the best value vs the pointspread. If you establish a process such as this, you will do less " second guessing " and be more confident in your selections.
The main thing is to make certain to the best of your ability, that the prop you select has more than a reasonable chance of meeting your expectation, thereby offering you a greater chance for success.
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
Wise - what do you think about Coker's road record ATS per above? I have some concerns about Houston week 1 ATS that I am evaluating.
LH , I know you were very positive about UH early , and now you have concerns. That's a healthy approach. I have a recommendation for you : 1. Generate a list of 10 things that must be present for you to make a wager on a prop.Do not settle for 9 2. Perform your " due diligence " to find how many props fit your criteria. 3. Refine the list to select the best 5 that are likely to meet your expectation. 4. Then, and only then, select the opportunities that offer the best value vs the pointspread. If you establish a process such as this, you will do less " second guessing " and be more confident in your selections.
The main thing is to make certain to the best of your ability, that the prop you select has more than a reasonable chance of meeting your expectation, thereby offering you a greater chance for success.
speaking of Dantonio's 23-9 record away.... *who you like 9/6....let's call it Ducks -13'.....????
The more I look into this game, the less I like it from a wagering standpoint. I like MSU's potential on " D " but I'm not sold on Connor Cook in this matchup. I think unless I get a real good number on either side , I'm inclined to pass on this one. I definitely will watch it .
BA
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
speaking of Dantonio's 23-9 record away.... *who you like 9/6....let's call it Ducks -13'.....????
The more I look into this game, the less I like it from a wagering standpoint. I like MSU's potential on " D " but I'm not sold on Connor Cook in this matchup. I think unless I get a real good number on either side , I'm inclined to pass on this one. I definitely will watch it .
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.