| Author: |
[College Football] Topic: Sign here if you agree on this playoff model. |
|
BigGame90 |
RSI  View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Veteran
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2415
Location: United States |
#1 Posted: 2/7/2012 9:47:12 PM Or add how you would fix/ alter it.
How to fix the NCAA college football championship game.
We all know the madness that goes on at the end of the college football season. Who's number 2 and 3? Number 1 is usually pretty clear, however it's never a guarantee. There will always be an argument over 2 and 3. I have come up with the solution to fix the controversy. My plan would actually benefit the 3 seed, as well as 10 others.
Here is my idea for a "play-off" system for the NCAA.
Top 10 qualify. ( I would rather who should be 10 over 11, rather then 2 over 3).
1st round 1 seed bye 2 seed bye 3 v 10 4 v 9 5 v 8 6 v 7
2nd round 1 v highest seed 2 v second highest seed Lowest seed v second lowest seed.
3rd round Lowest seed automatically advances to the championship game 2 remaining play for a chance to be the away team for the championship game.
4th round Championship game. - lowest seed gets home field- (Neutral site like the current situation, or even allow for the home team to host the game! support the local)
1st seed would have to win 2 games 2nd lowest seed would have to win 3 games 3-10 would have to win 4 games.
This way the 1st seed would have to win 2 games ( with having byes in
between games to rest, and game plan etc. They are the 1 seed so they
should have the advantage of having to win less games, they proved
during the regular season they are the best team in college they should
only have to beat 2 of the top 10 teams.) Lowest team would always have the home field.
A total of 9 games for the top 10 teams in NCAA, instead of 5. The country would be able to see talent from the top 10 schools on a national level. If you win, you get another game in front of a national audience. Makes the regular season more meaningful for ranked teams. 1 through 6 all get a home field game 3 seed has a chance for 2 home games, if 3 gets upset then 4 seed gets a second home game and so on.
Rest of the teams get a bowl game.
|
|
quote |
|
DoubleUp4Life |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes | |

Legend
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 30584
Location: New York |
#2 Posted: 2/7/2012 10:14:08 PM this is a horrible idea IMNHO
why punish the top 2 teams and force them to play teams that Lost 2+ Games
if the playoffs ever come say goodbye to out of conference games vs BCS Schools ---say hello to scheduling as many FCS foes as possible
|
|
quote |
|
NewDarkDay |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Veteran
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1497
Location: Illinois |
#3 Posted: 2/8/2012 3:37:43 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life: this is a horrible idea IMNHO
why punish the top 2 teams and force them to play teams that Lost 2+ Games
if the playoffs ever come say goodbye to out of conference games vs BCS Schools ---say hello to scheduling as many FCS foes as possible
its not if there will be a playoff its happennng n 2014 and this 10 team setup u have is just brutal f u want 4 rounds make it 16 teams and have it after semester finals and before 2nd semester starts
|
|
quote |
|
packers1992 |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Captain
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 6922
Location: Michigan |
#4 Posted: 2/8/2012 5:09:11 PM Biggame and all the best we are going to get for a playoff is a plus 1 which is a college football final 4 |
|
quote |
|
DoubleUp4Life |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes | |

Legend
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 30584
Location: New York |
#5 Posted: 2/8/2012 9:53:35 PM maybe Let 25 MAC and Sun belt teams plays the BCS schools and play 3 Games in a 7 day period |
|
quote |
|
|
|
eddothebook |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Banned
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1320
Location: |
#6 Posted: 2/9/2012 1:44:31 PM 
We don't want a playoff! Last thing we need is teams resting starters. College football is all about style points and fancy number.
Next we'll see teams taking a knee inside the 5 yard line with under 2 minutes to go because they are up 7+. Bullshit. |
|
quote |
|
mattbrot |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Veteran
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4699
Location: United States |
#7 Posted: 2/10/2012 1:14:36 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by eddothebook: 
We don't want a playoff! Last thing we need is teams resting starters. College football is all about style points and fancy number.
Next we'll see teams taking a knee inside the 5 yard line with under 2 minutes to go because they are up 7+. Bullshit.
I do not think this will be an issue with a +1 system
|
|
quote |
|
mattbrot |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Veteran
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4699
Location: United States |
#8 Posted: 2/10/2012 1:15:19 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by BigGame90:
Or add how you would fix/ alter it.
How to fix the NCAA college football championship game.
We all know the madness that goes on at the end of the college football season. Who's number 2 and 3? Number 1 is usually pretty clear, however it's never a guarantee. There will always be an argument over 2 and 3. I have come up with the solution to fix the controversy. My plan would actually benefit the 3 seed, as well as 10 others.
Here is my idea for a "play-off" system for the NCAA.
Top 10 qualify. ( I would rather who should be 10 over 11, rather then 2 over 3).
1st round 1 seed bye 2 seed bye 3 v 10 4 v 9 5 v 8 6 v 7
2nd round 1 v highest seed 2 v second highest seed Lowest seed v second lowest seed.
3rd round Lowest seed automatically advances to the championship game 2 remaining play for a chance to be the away team for the championship game.
4th round Championship game. - lowest seed gets home field- (Neutral site like the current situation, or even allow for the home team to host the game! support the local)
1st seed would have to win 2 games 2nd lowest seed would have to win 3 games 3-10 would have to win 4 games.
This way the 1st seed would have to win 2 games ( with having byes in
between games to rest, and game plan etc. They are the 1 seed so they
should have the advantage of having to win less games, they proved
during the regular season they are the best team in college they should
only have to beat 2 of the top 10 teams.) Lowest team would always have the home field.
A total of 9 games for the top 10 teams in NCAA, instead of 5. The country would be able to see talent from the top 10 schools on a national level. If you win, you get another game in front of a national audience. Makes the regular season more meaningful for ranked teams. 1 through 6 all get a home field game 3 seed has a chance for 2 home games, if 3 gets upset then 4 seed gets a second home game and so on.
Rest of the teams get a bowl game.
too many extra games.
|
|
quote |
|
BigGame90 |
RSI  View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Veteran
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2415
Location: United States |
#9 Posted: 2/10/2012 3:10:20 PM Do you think the bowl season has too many extra games? I'm pretty sure I saw a lot of stadiums not sold out. People want to watch the last week of the bowl season.
What about top 7. Round 1 1 gets a bye 2 v 7 3 v 6 4 v 5
Round 2 1 v highest ranked second lowest ranked v second highest ranked
Round 3 Championship
6 games for the top 7 Round 1 could be home games round 2 can be at current bowl locations round 3 can stay with the current championship game.
|
|
quote |
|
packers1992 |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Captain
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 6922
Location: Michigan |
#10 Posted: 2/10/2012 8:21:33 PM biggame its not that your idea is bad it's the fact that the best we're going to get is the plus 1/final 4 for football. I don't remember who said it but one of these empty suits said "The only reason people want a college football playoff is so they can fill out a bracket" That shows you the type of people that are running these schools |
|
quote |