Messages

#6  Angels     -100      240              140     680

#7 Indians    115                                      795

#8 Pirates   -100       -200     520    220     1015

#9 A's        140                                       1155

#10 Padres   110                                    1265

#11 Mets    160                                      1425

#12 Reds   -100      -200      420               1545

#13 Cubs  -100       -200     -300  -600         945

Remeber I only played $300 on Red and Cubs yesterday as part of money management.

2 game series are too short and 4 game series are too csotly if you get swept.  A game 4 loss would cost you 800 on a 100 game 1 wager.  I do like McShady's idea of jumping in on game 2 if the series dog gets beat in game 1.  I will be looking at those opportunites as well. 

Looking at 2 series for the weekend.

#14  Pirates     +125           Bet  1   100 to win 125

#15 Orioles     +135           Bet 1    100 to win 135

 Good Luck!  

Just for the sake of discussion.  Lets say there are (5) 3 game series that start on same day.  Games 1 - 5 with teams a & b for each game.

For the first game you bet on team 3a and it loses.  And to keep it simple lets say all the "a" teams lose in the other 4 games.

You bet on team 3a in the second game of the series and it loses again.

But teams 1a and 2a both won game 2 of their series leaving teams 3a, 4a and 5a as being one game from being swept in their series.

And lets say team 4a is Detroit and has Verlander going and 5a is the Phils and they have Halladay going.  Team 3a has Joe Schmuck going. 

Since all (3) teams are 0-2 would you consider going with either 4a or 5a instead of 3a whom you have bet on ? 

WOW!  If you are asking me would I switch to the other side of the bet.  I would most likely just cut my losses and not play the third game.  If Verlander is the fav against Joe SMoe the line would be  -180 or higher and I will nevr lay that kind of juice.