Boo I can NOT believe that U Mass-Lowell LOST to Notre Dame!!! were a -165 fav today
They controlled the 3rd period totally until N.D. tied it. Just couldn't add to their 2-1 lead and it bit them in the azz. They looked like the faster...stronger team but anything goes in OT.
Boo I can NOT believe that U Mass-Lowell LOST to Notre Dame!!! were a -165 fav today
They controlled the 3rd period totally until N.D. tied it. Just couldn't add to their 2-1 lead and it bit them in the azz. They looked like the faster...stronger team but anything goes in OT.
They controlled the 3rd period totally until N.D. tied it. Just couldn't add to their 2-1 lead and it bit them in the azz. They looked like the faster...stronger team but anything goes in OT.
THAT sound like a re-run of the Notre Dame vs Minnesota game. Gophers BLEW a 2-0 LEAD in that one and LOST 2-3
They controlled the 3rd period totally until N.D. tied it. Just couldn't add to their 2-1 lead and it bit them in the azz. They looked like the faster...stronger team but anything goes in OT.
THAT sound like a re-run of the Notre Dame vs Minnesota game. Gophers BLEW a 2-0 LEAD in that one and LOST 2-3
I do not understand the goalie interference rule.... Like not even a little bit
WHEATY- THERE IS NO UNDERSTANDING OF IT. GARY IS SLOWLY BUT SURELY DESTROYING THE NHL AS WE KNOW- OR SHOULD I SAY- KNEW IT. IT HAS TRULY BECOME AN ARBITRARY CALL, AND ONE MORE WAY FOR, AND I'M SORRY PURISTS AND THOSE THAT STILL DON'T BELIEVE THAT GAMES ARE- LET ME TAKE AWAY THE F WORD- PREDETERMINED
AND AS LONG AS WE HAVE A BREAK IN THE ACTION, IF ANYONE CAN ANSWER WHEATY'S QUESTION, YOU WILL GET TRIPLE BONUS POINTS FOR ANSWERING THIS ONE THEN. IN FACT, LETS JUST USE WHEATY'S EXACT QUESTION, AND REPLACE A FEW KEY WORDS
I do not understand the OFFSIDE rule.... Like not even a little bit
OR AT LEAST THE WAY THE NHL HAS CALLED- OR NOT CALLED- IT SINCE THEY PUT REPLAY INTO EFFECT (please refer to my first paragraph answer to wheaty's question above)
I do not understand the goalie interference rule.... Like not even a little bit
WHEATY- THERE IS NO UNDERSTANDING OF IT. GARY IS SLOWLY BUT SURELY DESTROYING THE NHL AS WE KNOW- OR SHOULD I SAY- KNEW IT. IT HAS TRULY BECOME AN ARBITRARY CALL, AND ONE MORE WAY FOR, AND I'M SORRY PURISTS AND THOSE THAT STILL DON'T BELIEVE THAT GAMES ARE- LET ME TAKE AWAY THE F WORD- PREDETERMINED
AND AS LONG AS WE HAVE A BREAK IN THE ACTION, IF ANYONE CAN ANSWER WHEATY'S QUESTION, YOU WILL GET TRIPLE BONUS POINTS FOR ANSWERING THIS ONE THEN. IN FACT, LETS JUST USE WHEATY'S EXACT QUESTION, AND REPLACE A FEW KEY WORDS
I do not understand the OFFSIDE rule.... Like not even a little bit
OR AT LEAST THE WAY THE NHL HAS CALLED- OR NOT CALLED- IT SINCE THEY PUT REPLAY INTO EFFECT (please refer to my first paragraph answer to wheaty's question above)
I haven't seen a lot of discrepancies on the offside calls this year. But I also haven't been watching as much hockey this year either.
That goalie interference rule truly baffles me. I understand their are judgement calls in sports but that one can clearly be manipulated in anyway the refs so choose. Shady shady stuff.
I haven't seen a lot of discrepancies on the offside calls this year. But I also haven't been watching as much hockey this year either.
That goalie interference rule truly baffles me. I understand their are judgement calls in sports but that one can clearly be manipulated in anyway the refs so choose. Shady shady stuff.
I haven't seen a lot of discrepancies on the offside calls this year. But I also haven't been watching as much hockey this year either.
That goalie interference rule truly baffles me. I understand THERE are judgement calls in sports but that one can clearly be manipulated in anyway the refs so choose. Shady shady stuff.
fixed it. I can't stand when ppl use that word incorrectly. And it REALLY pizzes me off when I do it
I haven't seen a lot of discrepancies on the offside calls this year. But I also haven't been watching as much hockey this year either.
That goalie interference rule truly baffles me. I understand THERE are judgement calls in sports but that one can clearly be manipulated in anyway the refs so choose. Shady shady stuff.
fixed it. I can't stand when ppl use that word incorrectly. And it REALLY pizzes me off when I do it
PSU just dodged a bullet. COULD have had a "head hunting" major but NO call. BUT still down 3-5 with just 3:30 to GO
Yeah...that was an absolute major. He left his feet and made clear contact to the head. But...the ref didn't want to put the game solely in his hands. But in the NHL...they would call a penalty at that point in the game if you chop a guys stick out of his hand and it doesn't even break.
PSU just dodged a bullet. COULD have had a "head hunting" major but NO call. BUT still down 3-5 with just 3:30 to GO
Yeah...that was an absolute major. He left his feet and made clear contact to the head. But...the ref didn't want to put the game solely in his hands. But in the NHL...they would call a penalty at that point in the game if you chop a guys stick out of his hand and it doesn't even break.
FUKKING William-Hill. NO NHL In Game tonight. those AZZHOLES!!! sweating a Flyers +185 and wanted to HEDGE!!! that means you guys may as well BOMB the Penguins In Game becuse THIS kind of SH!T always ends in TEAS for me
FUKKING William-Hill. NO NHL In Game tonight. those AZZHOLES!!! sweating a Flyers +185 and wanted to HEDGE!!! that means you guys may as well BOMB the Penguins In Game becuse THIS kind of SH!T always ends in TEAS for me
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.