I'll try to put some trends in here a bit later but for this Kings game there's this:
Kings: Under 11-2-4 last 17 after scoring 2 or less goals in their previous game. Under 20-6-6 last 32 following a home loss of 3 or more goals.
For Wild Under 11-3-3 last 17 when opponent scores 2 or less in their previous game. Under 5-0-1 last 6 meetings in L.A. between these two clubs.
Boston is 4-0 last 4 vs. Atlantic, 50-22 last 72 Saturday games, Under 4-1 last 5 vs. Atlantic. For Florida Under is 6-2-4 last 12 on no days rest, Under 6-2-1 last 9 in 3rd game of a 3-in-4 situation. Panthers 2-5 last 7 in 3rd game of a 3-in-4 situation, 1-4 last 5 on zero days rest, 0-4 last 4 vs. Atlantic
I'll try to put some trends in here a bit later but for this Kings game there's this:
Kings: Under 11-2-4 last 17 after scoring 2 or less goals in their previous game. Under 20-6-6 last 32 following a home loss of 3 or more goals.
For Wild Under 11-3-3 last 17 when opponent scores 2 or less in their previous game. Under 5-0-1 last 6 meetings in L.A. between these two clubs.
Boston is 4-0 last 4 vs. Atlantic, 50-22 last 72 Saturday games, Under 4-1 last 5 vs. Atlantic. For Florida Under is 6-2-4 last 12 on no days rest, Under 6-2-1 last 9 in 3rd game of a 3-in-4 situation. Panthers 2-5 last 7 in 3rd game of a 3-in-4 situation, 1-4 last 5 on zero days rest, 0-4 last 4 vs. Atlantic
Cheers everyone. It's nice to see everyone lots of good people on the NHL forums and some really good hockey fans around here.
Adding
Sharks -140 FT
Flames -125 FT
Like Crazy Train and a few others on here I'm going to try to avoid the west coast teams but Sharks lost two games in a row at home and here comes Detroit, I have to go w/ Sharks. Also Flames have to rebound in this one after losing to Vancouver 4-2. It's tough to beat a team two games in a row. Also Flames had almost 50 shots I believe in that last game.
Cheers everyone. It's nice to see everyone lots of good people on the NHL forums and some really good hockey fans around here.
Adding
Sharks -140 FT
Flames -125 FT
Like Crazy Train and a few others on here I'm going to try to avoid the west coast teams but Sharks lost two games in a row at home and here comes Detroit, I have to go w/ Sharks. Also Flames have to rebound in this one after losing to Vancouver 4-2. It's tough to beat a team two games in a row. Also Flames had almost 50 shots I believe in that last game.
Cheers everyone. It's nice to see everyone lots of good people on the NHL forums and some really good hockey fans around here.
Adding
Sharks -140 FT
Flames -125 FT
Like Crazy Train and a few others on here I'm going to try to avoid the west coast teams but Sharks lost two games in a row at home and here comes Detroit, I have to go w/ Sharks. Also Flames have to rebound in this one after losing to Vancouver 4-2. It's tough to beat a team two games in a row. Also Flames had almost 50 shots I believe in that last game.
Hey Coin- Great to see you back Buddy . Was hoping you weren't one of the 1 month wonders, then gone- BUT, obviously not, and I'm not a Rocket Scientist (Please don't tell Nasa where I'm at though), but I was ably to deduce thats by
A. - Seeing you've been here since 2008 AND
B.- Seeing you back here tonight
MAYBE I'M SMARTER THAN I THOUGHT
I'm on both with you on a Parlay, plus both on a Parlay and Nucks/ Flames o4.5 and it that last PP would have been SO DAMN SWEEEET THEN ANOTHER ALMOST GOAL BY FLAMES
Cheers everyone. It's nice to see everyone lots of good people on the NHL forums and some really good hockey fans around here.
Adding
Sharks -140 FT
Flames -125 FT
Like Crazy Train and a few others on here I'm going to try to avoid the west coast teams but Sharks lost two games in a row at home and here comes Detroit, I have to go w/ Sharks. Also Flames have to rebound in this one after losing to Vancouver 4-2. It's tough to beat a team two games in a row. Also Flames had almost 50 shots I believe in that last game.
Hey Coin- Great to see you back Buddy . Was hoping you weren't one of the 1 month wonders, then gone- BUT, obviously not, and I'm not a Rocket Scientist (Please don't tell Nasa where I'm at though), but I was ably to deduce thats by
A. - Seeing you've been here since 2008 AND
B.- Seeing you back here tonight
MAYBE I'M SMARTER THAN I THOUGHT
I'm on both with you on a Parlay, plus both on a Parlay and Nucks/ Flames o4.5 and it that last PP would have been SO DAMN SWEEEET THEN ANOTHER ALMOST GOAL BY FLAMES
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.