Hey Kipper thanks for the resource though I haven't figured out how to use it for the few mins I was able check it out. I haven't had any time to look at these today and may not be able to, but may be able to comment on a few in a moment let me see what I can do. For now ana is -105 ML, but the -.5 is +200, and the +0 is +116, is there value in any of those two? Nsh is also off the charts for +0 at -193 for me and even the ML is -155 so I can't get that for anything of value unless you think +115 for the -.5 is legit, but with this gm having the highest draw proability in accordance to vegas I find it hard to place. If you can get back to me that would be awesome, and I'll work on looking at some of the match ups. If you are doing what you say though it doesn't make sense for me to follow those variables. I presume that is why when I agree with you it has hit so often 4-1 as of recent and 5-0 prior to that(though the 5-0 wasn't recorded with as much consistency as I was looking at picks every few days for that.) Point is if the variables I look at, which is days rest H/A if my numbers point to value and your variabels also point to value...well you get the point. GL hope to hear from you soon, school is dogging me now with assignments and exams are in two weeks so I gotta hit the books heavy tonight. cheers
Hey Kipper thanks for the resource though I haven't figured out how to use it for the few mins I was able check it out. I haven't had any time to look at these today and may not be able to, but may be able to comment on a few in a moment let me see what I can do. For now ana is -105 ML, but the -.5 is +200, and the +0 is +116, is there value in any of those two? Nsh is also off the charts for +0 at -193 for me and even the ML is -155 so I can't get that for anything of value unless you think +115 for the -.5 is legit, but with this gm having the highest draw proability in accordance to vegas I find it hard to place. If you can get back to me that would be awesome, and I'll work on looking at some of the match ups. If you are doing what you say though it doesn't make sense for me to follow those variables. I presume that is why when I agree with you it has hit so often 4-1 as of recent and 5-0 prior to that(though the 5-0 wasn't recorded with as much consistency as I was looking at picks every few days for that.) Point is if the variables I look at, which is days rest H/A if my numbers point to value and your variabels also point to value...well you get the point. GL hope to hear from you soon, school is dogging me now with assignments and exams are in two weeks so I gotta hit the books heavy tonight. cheers
Looking at just this year as I was not able to spend time looking at previous years due to time constraints.
Pit -.5 I am on the fence the price is right, but I recall in the past pit has been bad in this position at home and this year they are ok with the exception they go to OT way too much, but NJ fits the bill in that they should lose in reg. One other positive for pit is they have played exceptional on extra rest away, they just have never played well at home on such for many years now.
Tor +.5 Toronto looks good in this position without the +.5(maybe+0 at +176?) but even better with the +.5 The problem is Florida is also equally good in this position. Together I give it a 59% prob of covering.
Ana I don't see enough to agree with unless like with the penguins I was to include all their extra rest gms and not just those @. Boston actually has played well on no rest this year so far.
Alright that's all I got in me today. The only pick I can agree with is tor +.5 GL no true kipper approved picks today lol but toronto gets the begrudging nod
Looking at just this year as I was not able to spend time looking at previous years due to time constraints.
Pit -.5 I am on the fence the price is right, but I recall in the past pit has been bad in this position at home and this year they are ok with the exception they go to OT way too much, but NJ fits the bill in that they should lose in reg. One other positive for pit is they have played exceptional on extra rest away, they just have never played well at home on such for many years now.
Tor +.5 Toronto looks good in this position without the +.5(maybe+0 at +176?) but even better with the +.5 The problem is Florida is also equally good in this position. Together I give it a 59% prob of covering.
Ana I don't see enough to agree with unless like with the penguins I was to include all their extra rest gms and not just those @. Boston actually has played well on no rest this year so far.
Alright that's all I got in me today. The only pick I can agree with is tor +.5 GL no true kipper approved picks today lol but toronto gets the begrudging nod
I also agree with hurricanes, but was wondering what you thought of -129 for the +.5? I feel that this and the +0 have value(obviously as they have the same stats), it is just that I can place the +.5 for 1 unit while I have to place +0 at +130 for 2 units.
I also agree with hurricanes, but was wondering what you thought of -129 for the +.5? I feel that this and the +0 have value(obviously as they have the same stats), it is just that I can place the +.5 for 1 unit while I have to place +0 at +130 for 2 units.
I'm with you on the first 2 Kipper, and we could both be OK if your last 2 go to OT. Good Luck Buddy, and I'm still waiting for you to come pick Granlund up
I'm with you on the first 2 Kipper, and we could both be OK if your last 2 go to OT. Good Luck Buddy, and I'm still waiting for you to come pick Granlund up
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.