@thehuntmen.... you and I obviously operate with different BR management rules.... I have certain perameters that I have to operate in based on my recent performance. I don't allow myself the flexibility to 'Jump" at will. Not saying your style is not effective for you, but I just don't allow myself that flexibility.
@thehuntmen.... you and I obviously operate with different BR management rules.... I have certain perameters that I have to operate in based on my recent performance. I don't allow myself the flexibility to 'Jump" at will. Not saying your style is not effective for you, but I just don't allow myself that flexibility.
Thanks for the info on the 1st period lines you play kinda new to the hole hockey betting. Wasn't sure why you did it. I know you hit a good portion of the time and was seeing what the strategy was. GL today
Thanks for the info on the 1st period lines you play kinda new to the hole hockey betting. Wasn't sure why you did it. I know you hit a good portion of the time and was seeing what the strategy was. GL today
Dam lazy Rangers tonight. Hopefully da Hawks keep up the pace to cover. Also got the Habs for a little.
GL on the Habs H.T.... only issue I have with that is 'perception'.... perception is that the Habs are far and away better than the downward trajectory Sharks, but in actuality the Sharks are pretty even w/ the Habs at home in comparison to the Habs on the road....But, if the Habs are behind--which they are right now, they'll have to abandon their 'suffocate the neutral zone' style, and score.... hence the Over TT....we'll see though....GL, hope we both hit our plays my friend
Dam lazy Rangers tonight. Hopefully da Hawks keep up the pace to cover. Also got the Habs for a little.
GL on the Habs H.T.... only issue I have with that is 'perception'.... perception is that the Habs are far and away better than the downward trajectory Sharks, but in actuality the Sharks are pretty even w/ the Habs at home in comparison to the Habs on the road....But, if the Habs are behind--which they are right now, they'll have to abandon their 'suffocate the neutral zone' style, and score.... hence the Over TT....we'll see though....GL, hope we both hit our plays my friend
I'm learning as much as I can about hockey, as I've not studied it deeply yet.
Why in the eff would the Habs mess with the 'suffocate the neutral zone' garbage in the first place?
Why not just eff'n score and keep on scoring?
I see guys in the "In Games" thread commenting that the Ducks' MO is to just slam the puck to the goal as many times as possible, thus increasing the numbers of rebounds ... and scores.
That kind of MO makes a lot of sense to me. Why get fancy with fancy passing and not just slam the puck home as often as possible?
I'm learning as much as I can about hockey, as I've not studied it deeply yet.
Why in the eff would the Habs mess with the 'suffocate the neutral zone' garbage in the first place?
Why not just eff'n score and keep on scoring?
I see guys in the "In Games" thread commenting that the Ducks' MO is to just slam the puck to the goal as many times as possible, thus increasing the numbers of rebounds ... and scores.
That kind of MO makes a lot of sense to me. Why get fancy with fancy passing and not just slam the puck home as often as possible?
Can someone call up the damn Habs and tell them that there is a hockey game going on in San Jose with guys who are masquerading in Habs uniforms pretending to be the Habs, yet are utterly FAILING to score?
Please call them!
WTF, Habs?
Hellloooo? Habs?
... Yes?
You got some monkeys skating around in your uniforms pretending to be you!
And those impostors are being eaten by sharks, man!
Can someone call up the damn Habs and tell them that there is a hockey game going on in San Jose with guys who are masquerading in Habs uniforms pretending to be the Habs, yet are utterly FAILING to score?
Please call them!
WTF, Habs?
Hellloooo? Habs?
... Yes?
You got some monkeys skating around in your uniforms pretending to be you!
And those impostors are being eaten by sharks, man!
I'm learning as much as I can about hockey, as I've not studied it deeply yet.
Why in the eff would the Habs mess with the 'suffocate the neutral zone' garbage in the first place?
Why not just eff'n score and keep on scoring?
I see guys in the "In Games" thread commenting that the Ducks' MO is to just slam the puck to the goal as many times as possible, thus increasing the numbers of rebounds ... and scores.
That kind of MO makes a lot of sense to me. Why get fancy with fancy passing and not just slam the puck home as often as possible?
Why does not EVERY team do this?
It is actually effective for most that do it properly... Habs just laid down tonight and never showed up..... it happens (to some teams more than others, but it happens)
I'm learning as much as I can about hockey, as I've not studied it deeply yet.
Why in the eff would the Habs mess with the 'suffocate the neutral zone' garbage in the first place?
Why not just eff'n score and keep on scoring?
I see guys in the "In Games" thread commenting that the Ducks' MO is to just slam the puck to the goal as many times as possible, thus increasing the numbers of rebounds ... and scores.
That kind of MO makes a lot of sense to me. Why get fancy with fancy passing and not just slam the puck home as often as possible?
Why does not EVERY team do this?
It is actually effective for most that do it properly... Habs just laid down tonight and never showed up..... it happens (to some teams more than others, but it happens)
Need the primary plays to ensure profit, and the secondary plays for big days.... just have to settle for profit tonight
Congrats 7's. Nothing wrong with "just having to settle for profit" I would gladly take that every night
Don't know if you watched Hab's/ Minnows as you had nothing going on it, but Burns pulled a sure Hab's goal from the goal line that cost me from cashing the Grand Salami over by 1/2 a damn goal tonight
Great job on capping another winning, albeit- "settle for a profit" night
Need the primary plays to ensure profit, and the secondary plays for big days.... just have to settle for profit tonight
Congrats 7's. Nothing wrong with "just having to settle for profit" I would gladly take that every night
Don't know if you watched Hab's/ Minnows as you had nothing going on it, but Burns pulled a sure Hab's goal from the goal line that cost me from cashing the Grand Salami over by 1/2 a damn goal tonight
Great job on capping another winning, albeit- "settle for a profit" night
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.