another sports wagering day awakens from the stench of the sty, that smells a bit better after a modest profit last night.... spurs total managed to go over, thanks to OT cinncy in bases was a winner. coach threw in a handful of winners across the wagering spectrum as did metta, melo, and baby... bacteria is becoming a regular along with stone cutter, and gambit is the resident cheerleader/ whiner...depending on his wagering fortunes at any given moment... on to todays games....first, lets take a look at the twins visiting the braves in hotlanta...after a spectacular start to the season, paul maholm is pitching more like the career journeyman he is. in his last 3 starts he is sporting a WHIP of 1.62 and ERA of 5.62. vance worley has been pitching slightly better his last 3 starts but still has awful numbers.....a WHIP of 1.84 and an ERA of 4.41.... but here are the numbers that really jump out at me....in his last 16.1 innings, he has allowed 26 hits...while maholm has allowed 20 hits in his last 16 innings. in their last 3 starts these pitchers are a combined 5-1 to the over.. worley has a BAA of 369, but it drops to 255 in day games, a number that also caught my attention...left handed hitters are hitting a scant 117 against maholm, but righties are hitting close to 300 against him, and not surprisingly the twin lineup features only one left handed hitter, justin morneau..i thought the total on this game would be 8 1/2, maybe 9.....and i see 7 1/2, and i smell a trap, but this mouse....or pig, will take the cheese and go over 7 1/2 full game and over 4 first 5......i really like this play, trap or not...i think the line is skewed due to maholms 3-0 start and 0.00 ERA over that time... also, in the reds-mets game....i dont usually do this, but i will make a SMALL play on a prop....NO SCORE in the first inning...both pitchers ( latos and harvey) pitching well and neither team ripping the cover off the ball..a lot of juice at - 145 or it would be a bigger play. good luck to everyone, unless you fade my picks . lets try and beat up on the MAN.... i will be back later... feel free to comment or leave some suggestions for plays... thanks everyone.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
another sports wagering day awakens from the stench of the sty, that smells a bit better after a modest profit last night.... spurs total managed to go over, thanks to OT cinncy in bases was a winner. coach threw in a handful of winners across the wagering spectrum as did metta, melo, and baby... bacteria is becoming a regular along with stone cutter, and gambit is the resident cheerleader/ whiner...depending on his wagering fortunes at any given moment... on to todays games....first, lets take a look at the twins visiting the braves in hotlanta...after a spectacular start to the season, paul maholm is pitching more like the career journeyman he is. in his last 3 starts he is sporting a WHIP of 1.62 and ERA of 5.62. vance worley has been pitching slightly better his last 3 starts but still has awful numbers.....a WHIP of 1.84 and an ERA of 4.41.... but here are the numbers that really jump out at me....in his last 16.1 innings, he has allowed 26 hits...while maholm has allowed 20 hits in his last 16 innings. in their last 3 starts these pitchers are a combined 5-1 to the over.. worley has a BAA of 369, but it drops to 255 in day games, a number that also caught my attention...left handed hitters are hitting a scant 117 against maholm, but righties are hitting close to 300 against him, and not surprisingly the twin lineup features only one left handed hitter, justin morneau..i thought the total on this game would be 8 1/2, maybe 9.....and i see 7 1/2, and i smell a trap, but this mouse....or pig, will take the cheese and go over 7 1/2 full game and over 4 first 5......i really like this play, trap or not...i think the line is skewed due to maholms 3-0 start and 0.00 ERA over that time... also, in the reds-mets game....i dont usually do this, but i will make a SMALL play on a prop....NO SCORE in the first inning...both pitchers ( latos and harvey) pitching well and neither team ripping the cover off the ball..a lot of juice at - 145 or it would be a bigger play. good luck to everyone, unless you fade my picks . lets try and beat up on the MAN.... i will be back later... feel free to comment or leave some suggestions for plays... thanks everyone.
im playing both of these as well... twins TT over 3 and
braves TT over 4....juice is reasonable and i think this game goes over,
so both teams should have a chance at going over.....bullpens are
fairly decent, nothing special...
0
im playing both of these as well... twins TT over 3 and
braves TT over 4....juice is reasonable and i think this game goes over,
so both teams should have a chance at going over.....bullpens are
fairly decent, nothing special...
so far my only play is padres TT O. tyler lyons is the starting pitcher coming from AAA where he was giving up 11 hits/9 innings and has a 1.4 whip. now STL is starting him in the majors tonight vs SD, who has been kind of hot recently, in their hitter's park in Petco, I do think they should be able to manufacture runs.
0
so far my only play is padres TT O. tyler lyons is the starting pitcher coming from AAA where he was giving up 11 hits/9 innings and has a 1.4 whip. now STL is starting him in the majors tonight vs SD, who has been kind of hot recently, in their hitter's park in Petco, I do think they should be able to manufacture runs.
Hey guys, still disappointed about losing that SF/WAS Over last night. But at least SF covered the TT in the end. Got a bunch for early games...
Both Latos and Harvey are top notch, but Cinc has a huge edge in hitting; they should be able to score enough off Harvey to win this game. Nice getting plus money too.
. Hellickson and Buehrle about as bad as it gets. Both teams hitting well but took it easy last night. If offenses are motivated they could bury these pitchers, so 9.5 isn't that high.
. Though FG over lost last night, I'm surprised its so cheap with the high outgoing winds (19mph). Both pitchers have given up their share of runs, and both tend to play in Over games. Gonna take another shot at a blowout.
st inning YES +135 Wash/SF SMALL. Worked out nicely last night; same circumstances today. Like getting that 135.
. Was going to play the Snakes, but I like both these pitchers and think they can hold off the offenses for the 1st 5. Wind blowing in could help keep it safe. Still high risk though, so just a small play.
0
Hey guys, still disappointed about losing that SF/WAS Over last night. But at least SF covered the TT in the end. Got a bunch for early games...
Both Latos and Harvey are top notch, but Cinc has a huge edge in hitting; they should be able to score enough off Harvey to win this game. Nice getting plus money too.
. Hellickson and Buehrle about as bad as it gets. Both teams hitting well but took it easy last night. If offenses are motivated they could bury these pitchers, so 9.5 isn't that high.
. Though FG over lost last night, I'm surprised its so cheap with the high outgoing winds (19mph). Both pitchers have given up their share of runs, and both tend to play in Over games. Gonna take another shot at a blowout.
st inning YES +135 Wash/SF SMALL. Worked out nicely last night; same circumstances today. Like getting that 135.
. Was going to play the Snakes, but I like both these pitchers and think they can hold off the offenses for the 1st 5. Wind blowing in could help keep it safe. Still high risk though, so just a small play.
so far my only play is padres TT O. tyler lyons is the starting pitcher coming from AAA where he was giving up 11 hits/9 innings and has a 1.4 whip. now STL is starting him in the majors tonight vs SD, who has been kind of hot recently, in their hitter's park in Petco, I do think they should be able to manufacture runs.
Nothing against the play itself, but I think Petco is considered a pitcher's park rather than hitter's....
0
Quote Originally Posted by MettaWorldWar:
so far my only play is padres TT O. tyler lyons is the starting pitcher coming from AAA where he was giving up 11 hits/9 innings and has a 1.4 whip. now STL is starting him in the majors tonight vs SD, who has been kind of hot recently, in their hitter's park in Petco, I do think they should be able to manufacture runs.
Nothing against the play itself, but I think Petco is considered a pitcher's park rather than hitter's....
Hey guys, still disappointed about losing that SF/WAS Over last night. But at least SF covered the TT in the end. Got a bunch for early games...
Both Latos and Harvey are top notch, but Cinc has a huge edge in hitting; they should be able to score enough off Harvey to win this game. Nice getting plus money too.
. Hellickson and Buehrle about as bad as it gets. Both teams hitting well but took it easy last night. If offenses are motivated they could bury these pitchers, so 9.5 isn't that high.
. Though FG over lost last night, I'm surprised its so cheap with the high outgoing winds (19mph). Both pitchers have given up their share of runs, and both tend to play in Over games. Gonna take another shot at a blowout.
st inning YES +135 Wash/SF SMALL. Worked out nicely last night; same circumstances today. Like getting that 135.
. Was going to play the Snakes, but I like both these pitchers and think they can hold off the offenses for the 1st 5. Wind blowing in could help keep it safe. Still high risk though, so just a small play.
Most of the text is there, but seems the plays themselves got lost. They were bolded and got dropped. Strange....
They are....
Cinc +106 MEDIUM.
Over 9.5 Even TB/Tor MEDIUM.
A/R above two SMALL.
Over 6.5 -120 Wash/SF BIG.
Prop: Score in 1st inning YES +135 Wash/SF.
1st 5 innings Under 5 Ariz/Col SMALL.
Now the other text should make sense. GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by Baby_BA:
Hey guys, still disappointed about losing that SF/WAS Over last night. But at least SF covered the TT in the end. Got a bunch for early games...
Both Latos and Harvey are top notch, but Cinc has a huge edge in hitting; they should be able to score enough off Harvey to win this game. Nice getting plus money too.
. Hellickson and Buehrle about as bad as it gets. Both teams hitting well but took it easy last night. If offenses are motivated they could bury these pitchers, so 9.5 isn't that high.
. Though FG over lost last night, I'm surprised its so cheap with the high outgoing winds (19mph). Both pitchers have given up their share of runs, and both tend to play in Over games. Gonna take another shot at a blowout.
st inning YES +135 Wash/SF SMALL. Worked out nicely last night; same circumstances today. Like getting that 135.
. Was going to play the Snakes, but I like both these pitchers and think they can hold off the offenses for the 1st 5. Wind blowing in could help keep it safe. Still high risk though, so just a small play.
Most of the text is there, but seems the plays themselves got lost. They were bolded and got dropped. Strange....
It looks like there will be a lot of juice laid today. Here are my leans, let me know if anyone has the same.
As/Rangers O10
Rays/Jays O9.5
Cards/Padres O8
Cin/NYM U3.5 F5
Det/Cle U4.5 F5
Det ML -144
LAA ML -186
NYY ML -113
BOS ML -135
KC ML -200
Lock....generally speaking, I would caution against playing heavy favs as that's a recipe for long-term disaster. At those prices, going a respectable 3-2, you'd turn a very small profit. Thus, it boils down to a simple risk/reward analysis. Also, keep in mind that the lines are generally reflective of the starting pitchers which assumes that both starters will pitch their typical game. However, we all know that even the top SPs in the game today won't have their best stuff game in and game out.
Further, let's look at that KC game. Shields is a stud who "should" win this matchup from the "public's" perspective. His 2.45 ERA is really good...particularly in the AL. But hold on a second....his 2-4 record tells me something further.....his team, for whatever reason, is not providing much run support posting a measly 5 runs in his 4 losses. Moreover, the team is 3-6 in his 9 starts this year.
Now, I'm not saying that KC will lose tonight but with all of the above in mind, is it really worth risking big-time juice for a nominal return? I'll also guarantee you that many will include KC in parlays tonight banking on a sure thing. While this could very well work out, I just don't think that this is a profitable strategy in the long-run. After all, this is the MLB where unlikely stuff happens on a daily basis.......JMO.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Never_Say_Lock:
It looks like there will be a lot of juice laid today. Here are my leans, let me know if anyone has the same.
As/Rangers O10
Rays/Jays O9.5
Cards/Padres O8
Cin/NYM U3.5 F5
Det/Cle U4.5 F5
Det ML -144
LAA ML -186
NYY ML -113
BOS ML -135
KC ML -200
Lock....generally speaking, I would caution against playing heavy favs as that's a recipe for long-term disaster. At those prices, going a respectable 3-2, you'd turn a very small profit. Thus, it boils down to a simple risk/reward analysis. Also, keep in mind that the lines are generally reflective of the starting pitchers which assumes that both starters will pitch their typical game. However, we all know that even the top SPs in the game today won't have their best stuff game in and game out.
Further, let's look at that KC game. Shields is a stud who "should" win this matchup from the "public's" perspective. His 2.45 ERA is really good...particularly in the AL. But hold on a second....his 2-4 record tells me something further.....his team, for whatever reason, is not providing much run support posting a measly 5 runs in his 4 losses. Moreover, the team is 3-6 in his 9 starts this year.
Now, I'm not saying that KC will lose tonight but with all of the above in mind, is it really worth risking big-time juice for a nominal return? I'll also guarantee you that many will include KC in parlays tonight banking on a sure thing. While this could very well work out, I just don't think that this is a profitable strategy in the long-run. After all, this is the MLB where unlikely stuff happens on a daily basis.......JMO.
".his team, for whatever reason, is not providing much run support posting a measly 5 runs in his 4 losses. Moreover, the team is 3-6 in his 9 starts this year."
Do you and other cappers value a team's run support during their starts? I mean that just seems like a coincidence rather than a trend, at least to me. Theoretically the KC bats should be hitting the same day in and day out, I just never understood how someone can say that since one of their starters is pitching their team is going to be hitting differently. What I do enjoy about MLB versus NBA is it seems like there is a lot more consistency in the game. NBA is so fickle at some times, I'm not sure if it has to do with the refereeing or that the athletes in the NBA aren't as disciplined.
Anyways, all those are definitely juicy and I doubt I play them, they were just my leans. I think Shields and KC take care of Houston but I do agree that it's probably not worth the -200 to lay on it. Thanks for the reply.
0
Thanks for the advice Coach.
".his team, for whatever reason, is not providing much run support posting a measly 5 runs in his 4 losses. Moreover, the team is 3-6 in his 9 starts this year."
Do you and other cappers value a team's run support during their starts? I mean that just seems like a coincidence rather than a trend, at least to me. Theoretically the KC bats should be hitting the same day in and day out, I just never understood how someone can say that since one of their starters is pitching their team is going to be hitting differently. What I do enjoy about MLB versus NBA is it seems like there is a lot more consistency in the game. NBA is so fickle at some times, I'm not sure if it has to do with the refereeing or that the athletes in the NBA aren't as disciplined.
Anyways, all those are definitely juicy and I doubt I play them, they were just my leans. I think Shields and KC take care of Houston but I do agree that it's probably not worth the -200 to lay on it. Thanks for the reply.
Wow good start withe the over F5 and whole Atlanta game, thoughts on the texas F5 and FG? I like the F5 over
Don't know much about Ross Wolf other than being an 11-year journeyman in the minors which usually isn't a good thing. He did have a few appearances with FL and Oak with little success. Parker's pitched well as of late and has had success against Texas hitters. Too many variables for me....no play on F5 but will keep my eye on in-game potentials.
0
Quote Originally Posted by esco46:
Wow good start withe the over F5 and whole Atlanta game, thoughts on the texas F5 and FG? I like the F5 over
Don't know much about Ross Wolf other than being an 11-year journeyman in the minors which usually isn't a good thing. He did have a few appearances with FL and Oak with little success. Parker's pitched well as of late and has had success against Texas hitters. Too many variables for me....no play on F5 but will keep my eye on in-game potentials.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.