It is not a dumb question. Yes of course if u have the ML on either side it's a push..that's common sense. But if u have points or are laying points it a legitimate question. Tie's are very uncommon as they don't exist in college and rarely happens in the NFL. I have been wagering for 10 + years and had the points with Seattle tonight and thought it pushed. Would assume the same goes if I had AZ laying points but that's incorrect.
It is not a dumb question. Yes of course if u have the ML on either side it's a push..that's common sense. But if u have points or are laying points it a legitimate question. Tie's are very uncommon as they don't exist in college and rarely happens in the NFL. I have been wagering for 10 + years and had the points with Seattle tonight and thought it pushed. Would assume the same goes if I had AZ laying points but that's incorrect.
It is not a dumb question. Yes of course if u have the ML on either side it's a push..that's common sense. But if u have points or are laying points it a legitimate question. Tie's are very uncommon as they don't exist in college and rarely happens in the NFL. I have been wagering for 10 + years and had the points with Seattle tonight and thought it pushed. Would assume the same goes if I had AZ laying points but that's incorrect.
ur betting on the final unless otherwise specified i.e. 1st half, 3rd quarter
i catch your jist, but when get points you are never betting on a team to win, so i don't see what so hard.
It is not a dumb question. Yes of course if u have the ML on either side it's a push..that's common sense. But if u have points or are laying points it a legitimate question. Tie's are very uncommon as they don't exist in college and rarely happens in the NFL. I have been wagering for 10 + years and had the points with Seattle tonight and thought it pushed. Would assume the same goes if I had AZ laying points but that's incorrect.
ur betting on the final unless otherwise specified i.e. 1st half, 3rd quarter
i catch your jist, but when get points you are never betting on a team to win, so i don't see what so hard.
also if your european, i guess i understand, as thats usually a three way heat, or whatever its called in soccer, where a draw is involved and in play to bet on
also if your european, i guess i understand, as thats usually a three way heat, or whatever its called in soccer, where a draw is involved and in play to bet on
Honestly why are you guys gambling if you don't even understand what you're betting on
Classic fallacy - I tail good cappers. So what if I don't know the rules?
If it's a good bet in their eyes then that's enough for me
So your trader mate points you to a stock market complex derivative. He is right 90% of the time. Would you refuse to follow because you don't know quite how they work??
Honestly why are you guys gambling if you don't even understand what you're betting on
Classic fallacy - I tail good cappers. So what if I don't know the rules?
If it's a good bet in their eyes then that's enough for me
So your trader mate points you to a stock market complex derivative. He is right 90% of the time. Would you refuse to follow because you don't know quite how they work??
if you don't know whether you wont or lost your bet, you should not be wagering any amount of money on NFL games. there have been several ties in NFL the last 10-20 years, so its rare, but it has happened.
especially with these 2 defenses, and the way seattle was banged up on their o-line and their normally super mobile QB only has one leg, you should assume this one clearly couldve ended in a tie.
but the better question is, why the darn didnt everybody just take the under and under 1h, under 2h. it was free money. i tried to post but i have no cred on here so i dont blame anybody, but there is no way they were going to score 43.5 points. that was just as easy as oklahoma texas tech over, phi min under, and sd atl over. just style of play dictates totals and are way easier to win on, or at least i pick them much easier than sides...
however i did have a smallish wager on arizona and i am still sick about it,...
if you don't know whether you wont or lost your bet, you should not be wagering any amount of money on NFL games. there have been several ties in NFL the last 10-20 years, so its rare, but it has happened.
especially with these 2 defenses, and the way seattle was banged up on their o-line and their normally super mobile QB only has one leg, you should assume this one clearly couldve ended in a tie.
but the better question is, why the darn didnt everybody just take the under and under 1h, under 2h. it was free money. i tried to post but i have no cred on here so i dont blame anybody, but there is no way they were going to score 43.5 points. that was just as easy as oklahoma texas tech over, phi min under, and sd atl over. just style of play dictates totals and are way easier to win on, or at least i pick them much easier than sides...
however i did have a smallish wager on arizona and i am still sick about it,...
Classic fallacy - I tail good cappers. So what if I don't know the rules?
If it's a good bet in their eyes then that's enough for me
So your trader mate points you to a stock market complex derivative. He is right 90% of the time. Would you refuse to follow because you don't know quite how they work??
This is sports betting, find me a capper hitting 90% over a large sample.
Classic fallacy - I tail good cappers. So what if I don't know the rules?
If it's a good bet in their eyes then that's enough for me
So your trader mate points you to a stock market complex derivative. He is right 90% of the time. Would you refuse to follow because you don't know quite how they work??
This is sports betting, find me a capper hitting 90% over a large sample.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.