tsw - I've already change my mind on many of these plays!
Suuma - Thanks bud! First of all, Mike McCarthy owns Jim Schwartz since 2009, when he took the HC job in Detroit. GB went 7-2 during that spam, scoring 27 pts/game on average. I know it's a different story now, but some things remain the same. A lot of Schwartz's schemes are similiar, and i'm confident the best QB in football (At the moment) will continue his amazing streak. The Packers are 1st in give/take ratio, and their defense shows below average numbers because of how the offense creates huge scoring gaps with other teams. This is a great opportunity for Green bay to compare themselves with how they played the Seahawks in week 1 or the Lions in week 3. IMO, playing in Seattle, Detroit or Buffalo is pretty much the same these days. Three strong defenses in a hostile stadium. Green bay can play up north better than anyteam!
I'll keep looking, and i'll read your posts in case i've missed somehting.
tsw - I've already change my mind on many of these plays!
Suuma - Thanks bud! First of all, Mike McCarthy owns Jim Schwartz since 2009, when he took the HC job in Detroit. GB went 7-2 during that spam, scoring 27 pts/game on average. I know it's a different story now, but some things remain the same. A lot of Schwartz's schemes are similiar, and i'm confident the best QB in football (At the moment) will continue his amazing streak. The Packers are 1st in give/take ratio, and their defense shows below average numbers because of how the offense creates huge scoring gaps with other teams. This is a great opportunity for Green bay to compare themselves with how they played the Seahawks in week 1 or the Lions in week 3. IMO, playing in Seattle, Detroit or Buffalo is pretty much the same these days. Three strong defenses in a hostile stadium. Green bay can play up north better than anyteam!
I'll keep looking, and i'll read your posts in case i've missed somehting.
I am pretty far along in my survivor pool and this week to narrow the field down we are forced to pick three winners instead of just one..
i am going with the Rams and then most likely the Giants but am having a hard time coming up with the third team.... i have already picked all of the "good" teams... who do u think i should take out of these options:
Browns
Jets
Steelers
Panthers (do u think Cam injury matters that much?)
I respect ur opinion so I would appreciate a little help... keep in mind if i take the Rams tonight i have to lock in ALL THREE picks which is dumb but whatever , nothing i can do about it, so basically i need to pick by 7PM CST
I am pretty far along in my survivor pool and this week to narrow the field down we are forced to pick three winners instead of just one..
i am going with the Rams and then most likely the Giants but am having a hard time coming up with the third team.... i have already picked all of the "good" teams... who do u think i should take out of these options:
Browns
Jets
Steelers
Panthers (do u think Cam injury matters that much?)
I respect ur opinion so I would appreciate a little help... keep in mind if i take the Rams tonight i have to lock in ALL THREE picks which is dumb but whatever , nothing i can do about it, so basically i need to pick by 7PM CST
How do you feel about St.Louis at -5 for some reason I still like it seems like Vegas wants that Arizona money to keep coming in
I don't make plays with that kind of speculation, because you can turn it any way you want. You could say : It seems like Vegas is selling a "rightful" favorite status with the Rams, when it should be the opposite. Maybe they want us to think St-Louis deserves to be 5-6 pts fav so we keep putting our money on them. Or... Maybe... etc.
It's now -6 on my book... It's getting out of range for me, i'll probably pass!
How do you feel about St.Louis at -5 for some reason I still like it seems like Vegas wants that Arizona money to keep coming in
I don't make plays with that kind of speculation, because you can turn it any way you want. You could say : It seems like Vegas is selling a "rightful" favorite status with the Rams, when it should be the opposite. Maybe they want us to think St-Louis deserves to be 5-6 pts fav so we keep putting our money on them. Or... Maybe... etc.
It's now -6 on my book... It's getting out of range for me, i'll probably pass!
I am pretty far along in my survivor pool and this week to narrow the field down we are forced to pick three winners instead of just one..
i am going with the Rams and then most likely the Giants but am having a hard time coming up with the third team.... i have already picked all of the "good" teams... who do u think i should take out of these options:
Browns
Jets
Steelers
Panthers (do u think Cam injury matters that much?)
I respect ur opinion so I would appreciate a little help... keep in mind if i take the Rams tonight i have to lock in ALL THREE picks which is dumb but whatever , nothing i can do about it, so basically i need to pick by 7PM CST
I would probably go with St-Louis, NY Giants and Carolina!
I am pretty far along in my survivor pool and this week to narrow the field down we are forced to pick three winners instead of just one..
i am going with the Rams and then most likely the Giants but am having a hard time coming up with the third team.... i have already picked all of the "good" teams... who do u think i should take out of these options:
Browns
Jets
Steelers
Panthers (do u think Cam injury matters that much?)
I respect ur opinion so I would appreciate a little help... keep in mind if i take the Rams tonight i have to lock in ALL THREE picks which is dumb but whatever , nothing i can do about it, so basically i need to pick by 7PM CST
I would probably go with St-Louis, NY Giants and Carolina!
Good to see you early Mr. I like how you broke down the games by time and the picks. Makes it easy. Agreed. I had the same feeling that if it climbs up to 7 then I will make a small bet on the Angry Birds.
Good to see you early Mr. I like how you broke down the games by time and the picks. Makes it easy. Agreed. I had the same feeling that if it climbs up to 7 then I will make a small bet on the Angry Birds.
Good to see you early Mr. I like how you broke down the games by time and the picks. Makes it easy. Agreed. I had the same feeling that if it climbs up to 7 then I will make a small bet on the Angry Birds.
Good to see you early Mr. I like how you broke down the games by time and the picks. Makes it easy. Agreed. I had the same feeling that if it climbs up to 7 then I will make a small bet on the Angry Birds.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.