I seen it and i literally started laughing out loud, the wife goes wtf are you doing. I said oh nothing, got a good chuckle from something i read! BWHAHAHAHA got to love it man!
I seen it and i literally started laughing out loud, the wife goes wtf are you doing. I said oh nothing, got a good chuckle from something i read! BWHAHAHAHA got to love it man!
I'm finding the fades in NCAAF to be just as strong if not better. Last week they were 6-2.
The totals fade plays using only Accuscore's record and not ATS records today are Under 53.5 in the BYU/ND game (67%) and Under 45 Umass/C. Michigan (73%)
I'm finding the fades in NCAAF to be just as strong if not better. Last week they were 6-2.
The totals fade plays using only Accuscore's record and not ATS records today are Under 53.5 in the BYU/ND game (67%) and Under 45 Umass/C. Michigan (73%)
LTS has offically garbage the fuckingggg bed. I have his plays. Needless to say, I DONT PLAY THEM. Got buried with the knicks, got buried with new orleans, 1-1 tonight with 2 pending....I wouldnt play his picks with YOUR $
LTS has offically garbage the fuckingggg bed. I have his plays. Needless to say, I DONT PLAY THEM. Got buried with the knicks, got buried with new orleans, 1-1 tonight with 2 pending....I wouldnt play his picks with YOUR $
Again...thanks to CMW for clearing up the systeme and notifying me about the Accuscore record using the "star" icons. If only it were about 10 minutes earlier I wouldn't have used the ATS info! C'est la vie.
I don't know why they don't have an Accuscore record for every team, but it's clearly the better system to play. Going forward, I'm going to use only the Accuscore record as a guide either for a play or a fade.
Using only Accuscore records, here's what I have for today's results but using greater than 65% as a play vs. 70%:
Mich St. -7.5 W. Kentucky -5.5 Wyoming -6.5 Oklahoma St. +8 Florida Atlantic (F)-23 BYU/ND Under (F) - Umass/C. Mich Under (F)- Tulsa -3 (F) Nebraska/Penn St. Over UVA/Miamia Over Michigan/Iowa Over PUSH Florida State/Idaho Over
Overall 9-2 (Assuming Okie St. covers)
In summary, these are not my picks and I'm not a super capper. This system came from a guy who claimed it would be free forever and now (foolishly) is charging for picks. Now, I'm using it and posting the plays. There may be other threads from other posters doing the same. I'm not trying to clog the boards, just thought it might be interesting to some.
I'd also caution to those of you who are using Accuscore records for hoops that you might want to let the season mature a little bit longer (at least 20 games for NBA and maybe 10 for NCAA) so the computer has an adequate sample size to run with. Cool concept though. Good luck to everyone.
Again...thanks to CMW for clearing up the systeme and notifying me about the Accuscore record using the "star" icons. If only it were about 10 minutes earlier I wouldn't have used the ATS info! C'est la vie.
I don't know why they don't have an Accuscore record for every team, but it's clearly the better system to play. Going forward, I'm going to use only the Accuscore record as a guide either for a play or a fade.
Using only Accuscore records, here's what I have for today's results but using greater than 65% as a play vs. 70%:
Mich St. -7.5 W. Kentucky -5.5 Wyoming -6.5 Oklahoma St. +8 Florida Atlantic (F)-23 BYU/ND Under (F) - Umass/C. Mich Under (F)- Tulsa -3 (F) Nebraska/Penn St. Over UVA/Miamia Over Michigan/Iowa Over PUSH Florida State/Idaho Over
Overall 9-2 (Assuming Okie St. covers)
In summary, these are not my picks and I'm not a super capper. This system came from a guy who claimed it would be free forever and now (foolishly) is charging for picks. Now, I'm using it and posting the plays. There may be other threads from other posters doing the same. I'm not trying to clog the boards, just thought it might be interesting to some.
I'd also caution to those of you who are using Accuscore records for hoops that you might want to let the season mature a little bit longer (at least 20 games for NBA and maybe 10 for NCAA) so the computer has an adequate sample size to run with. Cool concept though. Good luck to everyone.
The NFL Accuscore system is just bad. But I'm playing: TB, KC, Jax, Minn, Balt, Chicago early games using a wannabe accuscore simulator that I run that looks like this, ranks each team using their NFL rank, totals it up and assigns -1 for every 10 points lower. Pretty good this year.
The NFL Accuscore system is just bad. But I'm playing: TB, KC, Jax, Minn, Balt, Chicago early games using a wannabe accuscore simulator that I run that looks like this, ranks each team using their NFL rank, totals it up and assigns -1 for every 10 points lower. Pretty good this year.
Oops, Guess the Excel sheet didn't post. Anyway, it uses Sacks, Interceptions, Passes defended, Sacks allowed, QB Hits allowed, TO margin, Penalty yards, Pass D ranking (from Football Outsiders), QBR, and Home field advantage. These are the suggested simulated lines I got:
Oops, Guess the Excel sheet didn't post. Anyway, it uses Sacks, Interceptions, Passes defended, Sacks allowed, QB Hits allowed, TO margin, Penalty yards, Pass D ranking (from Football Outsiders), QBR, and Home field advantage. These are the suggested simulated lines I got:
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.