Southern Methodist at Pittsburgh (01/07/2012)

Forum: College Football Page 3 of 3  1 2 3  
Author: [College Football] Topic: Southern Methodist at Pittsburgh (01/07/2012)
hordman PM hordman
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 41
 
hordman
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 1/7/2012 12:30:59 PM
I dont post too much on the site, but do I read alot of the message board to gauge a game and get some insight. I have a mathematical formula I use to calc pts/play and take into consideration the PR between the teams.  PR is the power ranking that this site displays after each weekend.

I ran the nos. and I got Pitt 32-17.  I do agree it's hard to get a feel for this Pitt team sometimes.  a friend of mine says that when Pitt is expected to win, they garbage the bed and when they are underdogs, they come thru and pull out a victory.

Without a doubt SMU's biggest win was TCU, but after watching TCU in the bowl game, their Def was definitely down this year and u can see why SMU threw all over the place vs. them.

Pitt has a played an above avg schedule this year, alot of Bowl teams on that list. I do agree that they will need to run the ball and keep Sunseri from having to make big plays for them, that's not his style.  Pitt's DEF has played decent at times as well. 

The keys to this game are TOs and Pitt's ability to run the ball effectively.  If SMU can go early, build a lead, Pitt will be in for a battle.

One item is that is joker in all of this is how Pitt responds to the loss of Coach Graham. The players were pissed and everyone saw Twitter and their opinion.  If they use that to galvanize the team and show him what he lost, then I can see Pitt putting up the score I wrote, 32-17.

GLTA.
NoBetNoWin PM NoBetNoWin
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 569
 
NoBetNoWin
Participation Meter
Rookie
Posted: 1/7/2012 12:38:30 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by hordman:

I dont post too much on the site, but do I read alot of the message board to gauge a game and get some insight. I have a mathematical formula I use to calc pts/play and take into consideration the PR between the teams.  PR is the power ranking that this site displays after each weekend.

I ran the nos. and I got Pitt 32-17.  I do agree it's hard to get a feel for this Pitt team sometimes.  a friend of mine says that when Pitt is expected to win, they garbage the bed and when they are underdogs, they come thru and pull out a victory.

Without a doubt SMU's biggest win was TCU, but after watching TCU in the bowl game, their Def was definitely down this year and u can see why SMU threw all over the place vs. them.

Pitt has a played an above avg schedule this year, alot of Bowl teams on that list. I do agree that they will need to run the ball and keep Sunseri from having to make big plays for them, that's not his style.  Pitt's DEF has played decent at times as well. 

The keys to this game are TOs and Pitt's ability to run the ball effectively.  If SMU can go early, build a lead, Pitt will be in for a battle.

One item is that is joker in all of this is how Pitt responds to the loss of Coach Graham. The players were pissed and everyone saw Twitter and their opinion.  If they use that to galvanize the team and show him what he lost, then I can see Pitt putting up the score I wrote, 32-17.

GLTA.

Nice post, would like to read more about your calculations..  I agree with all of your points.
GL.
hordman PM hordman
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 41
 
hordman
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 1/7/2012 12:47:17 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by NoBetNoWin:


Nice post, would like to read more about your calculations..  I agree with all of your points. GL.


Thanks, I use excel where I calculating a teams' plays per game vs. the pts they score.  It's sometimes tedious, looking at the stats online, but I use it because I need a baseline for predicting games. betting on games based on "gut", usually dont work for me, I've got my opinions on teams and most of the time that burns me.  using the my calculations allows me to be a little more unbiased.  GL.
WiseGuy702 PM WiseGuy702
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11862
 
WiseGuy702
Participation Meter
All-Star
Posted: 1/7/2012 12:48:54 PM
SMU +3.5

 Good luck 
NoBetNoWin PM NoBetNoWin
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 569
 
NoBetNoWin
Participation Meter
Rookie
Posted: 1/7/2012 12:54:08 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by hordman:



Thanks, I use excel where I calculating a teams' plays per game vs. the pts they score.  It's sometimes tedious, looking at the stats online, but I use it because I need a baseline for predicting games. betting on games based on "gut", usually dont work for me, I've got my opinions on teams and most of the time that burns me.  using the my calculations allows me to be a little more unbiased.  GL.

Interesting..  you could also rate their defenses.  # plays v pts given up? 
capdout PM capdout
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 769
 
capdout
Participation Meter
Rookie
Posted: 1/7/2012 12:58:46 PM
 SMU +4-   10 lbeersssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
hordman PM hordman
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 41
 
hordman
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 1/7/2012 1:01:12 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by NoBetNoWin:


Interesting..  you could also rate their defenses.  # plays v pts given up? 


yes, that's correct.  then I compare one team's OFF pts/play vs the other team's DEF pts/play and split the difference. and vice versa.

it's actually a nice little system, though it is typing intensive sometimes, cut/paste, etc.
wmi799 PM wmi799
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 20554
 
wmi799
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Posted: 1/7/2012 1:06:00 PM
Liking the under myself. BOL to all!
jorge112270 PM jorge112270
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 8713
 
jorge112270
Participation Meter
Captain
Posted: 1/7/2012 1:21:46 PM
pitt
hordman PM hordman
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 41
 
hordman
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 1/7/2012 1:22:32 PM
Well, they did everything opposite I wrote in my message above.  Sunseri looked bad in his decision, and they let SMU get up early.  Pitt is going to have be patient and run the ball to open Sunseri up.
BombaBookie PM BombaBookie
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 910
 
BombaBookie
Participation Meter
Rookie
Posted: 1/7/2012 2:24:02 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by NoBetNoWin:


Interesting..  you could also rate their defenses.  # plays v pts given up? 

I like that , everything is in stat variables tendencies

hordman PM hordman
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 41
 
hordman
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 1/7/2012 2:43:35 PM
I love how everyday football "observers & fans" can predict what a team needs to do to win games and yet "coaches" fail to do it. 

Pitt needs to run the ball, much bigger up front, and yet they are putting it in the hands of Sunseri to win it, who obviously can't make plays.

Oh well, game is over.  Congrats to all the SMU takers.  As I said earlier the post, when Pitt is suppose to win, they garbage the bed.

And right now, they got a mess to clean up.  GLTA with the remaining 2 bowl games.
BombaBookie PM BombaBookie
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 910
 
BombaBookie
Participation Meter
Rookie
Posted: 1/7/2012 3:02:18 PM

Over (2H) 24

BOLTALL!!!!

Forum: College Football Page 3 of 3  1 2 3  
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.