Posted: 4/26/2012 9:16:40 PM
Originally Posted by cashin
There are no witnesses to corroborate any of what we've heard of his story - none. Only 1 witness who says he saw Martin on top beating up Z at a point sometime before the shot was fired along with evidence that at some point his nose was hit & the back of his head was lacerated. And another 13 yr old kid who said it was to dark to say for sure, but after the cops pressured him & asked him to pick between 3 colors of shirts on the bottom he said red. None of which tell the story of what really happened that nite & that's why he was finally charged (along with the public outrage) & should have been -
Some of the things that were corroborated by witnesses or other evidence:
1. He screamed for help, but no one would help him.
2. He was struck in the nose and had his head pounded on the sidewalk. Police report and subsequent photos. His nose isn't going to break itself and back of his head aint gonna lacerate itself. Logic would say that the sidewalk is responsible for the lacerations. (Because a fuckin blade of grass isn't as someone who we will hold nameless has previously suggested)
3. Grass stains on the back of his red jacket. Corroborated by witness and police report and generally not disputed.
What else did he say that you think he lied about?