Listen wiseguy, you want to compare notes? O.K., I may have exaggerated a little, but seriously, on www.betus.com - even if you parlayed these 2 together you would still have to bet $100.00 just to win $49.60 - that's more than half of your wager lost.
Now, first of all, you let me know where you can get this same wager for just -130 - - - second of all, since when is a minus -130 bet "not costing you anything"?????????????? Simple math tells you that you still have to bet $130 to win $100 (or, $13 to win $10) - - sounds like a loss to me............
Like I said, go read a book on how to bet and what wagers mean, then come back in here - and maybe you can school me on how betting is done. Until then keep your mouth shut.
BTW - just because of your comments, here's my wager for you - Rams +7.5 and your precious over 37 - - $100 to win a total of $223.16 - - now THAT'S a positive bet, and maybe that's what you should be doing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Listen wiseguy, you want to compare notes? O.K., I may have exaggerated a little, but seriously, on www.betus.com - even if you parlayed these 2 together you would still have to bet $100.00 just to win $49.60 - that's more than half of your wager lost.
Now, first of all, you let me know where you can get this same wager for just -130 - - - second of all, since when is a minus -130 bet "not costing you anything"?????????????? Simple math tells you that you still have to bet $130 to win $100 (or, $13 to win $10) - - sounds like a loss to me............
Like I said, go read a book on how to bet and what wagers mean, then come back in here - and maybe you can school me on how betting is done. Until then keep your mouth shut.
BTW - just because of your comments, here's my wager for you - Rams +7.5 and your precious over 37 - - $100 to win a total of $223.16 - - now THAT'S a positive bet, and maybe that's what you should be doing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WON: 964 Yankees -1½ (-135) LP(Burnett, A J & Diamond, S) risk 350 win 259 (MLB) Score: 6-4 | LOST: INTERNET: 5 Team Parlay risk 25 win 334 | WON: 964 Yankees -1½ (-135) LP(Burnett, A J & Diamond, S) (MLB) Score: 6-4 WON: 968 D2 Red Sox (-250) AT (MLB) Score: 18-9 LOST: 972 D1 Red Sox (-163) AT (MLB) Score: 5-6 LOST: TOT UND 972 D1 Red Sox/D1 Orioles under 10 (-105) AT (MLB) Score: 5-6 | WON: INTERNET: 3 Team Parlay risk 235 win 986 | WON: 964 Yankees -1½ (-135) LP(Burnett, A J & Diamond, S) (MLB) Score: 6-4 WON: 968 D2 Red Sox -1½ (-135) LP(Lackey, J & Matusz, B) (MLB) Score: 18-9 | WON: INTERNET: 3 Team Parlay risk 75 win 172 | WON: 968 D2 Red Sox (-250) AT (MLB) Score: 18-9 WON: 964 Yankees (-270) AT (MLB) Score: 6-4 | WON: INTERNET: 2 Team 2T SP TEASER Teaser(ties no action) risk 495 win 450 | WON: TOT UND 228 Giants/Rams under 49½ (NFL) (6.0 pts) Score: 28-16 | WON: INTERNET: 3 Team Parlay risk 114 win 621 | PUSHED: TOT UND 228 Giants/Rams under 44 Buy ½ (-120) (NFL) Score: 28-16 WON: 959 Padres (+102) AT (MLB) Score: 8-2 | Quote Originally Posted by FreeMoneyInc: Thanks Bankjob - nice sweaty backdoor cover, just as I suspected :D will a little bit of prop money on the side. That's how money is made! agreed I actualy backed off on my teaser cuse I had so much BLK pending as our freind would say I hie big +$2200 with only 900 layed out.. ill t
|