*I still don't trust Na's new serve, it's completely hit or miss...and she can't bring anything but her "A" game if she expects to sneak by the win machine in Radwa.
Oprandi +7.5
*We all know Aza can cover this line if she's completely on her game, but she hasn't been in quite sometime. She's been doing just enough to get by the last few weeks. Would love to see Oprandi get me 4 games in the 1st set.
*I still don't trust Na's new serve, it's completely hit or miss...and she can't bring anything but her "A" game if she expects to sneak by the win machine in Radwa.
Oprandi +7.5
*We all know Aza can cover this line if she's completely on her game, but she hasn't been in quite sometime. She's been doing just enough to get by the last few weeks. Would love to see Oprandi get me 4 games in the 1st set.
Aza takes 1st 6-2, had a big chance to hold to get to 5-3...would've been HUGE.
Afraid I'm looking at a loser here unless Oprandi finds a way to break again somewhere in the 2nd. 38% on 1st serve simply wont get it done against anyone...let alone the #1
Aza takes 1st 6-2, had a big chance to hold to get to 5-3...would've been HUGE.
Afraid I'm looking at a loser here unless Oprandi finds a way to break again somewhere in the 2nd. 38% on 1st serve simply wont get it done against anyone...let alone the #1
Lisicki is a top 20 player. Vesnina is a better player than Oprandi. Not sure what you're getting at here.
You're not allowed to make an argument if you don't have stats to back it up. My point was, you claimed she's been dominate...yet she hadn't covered the +7.5 against any of her most recent opponents.
I must be crazy, cause I think Oprandi is ranked higher and has a 23-14 YTD compared to a lower ranked Vesnina with a 14-16 YTD
Really easy to argue against someone when you chime in 3/4 the way through the match. Haha. GL tonight buddy.
Lisicki is a top 20 player. Vesnina is a better player than Oprandi. Not sure what you're getting at here.
You're not allowed to make an argument if you don't have stats to back it up. My point was, you claimed she's been dominate...yet she hadn't covered the +7.5 against any of her most recent opponents.
I must be crazy, cause I think Oprandi is ranked higher and has a 23-14 YTD compared to a lower ranked Vesnina with a 14-16 YTD
Really easy to argue against someone when you chime in 3/4 the way through the match. Haha. GL tonight buddy.
Oprandi padded her record kicking around in low level events beating stiffs earlier in the yr. Her and Vesnina are virtually the same damn player. Why was Vika -2300 vs Oprandi and just -1500 vs Vesnina if Oprandi is the better player?
Oprandi padded her record kicking around in low level events beating stiffs earlier in the yr. Her and Vesnina are virtually the same damn player. Why was Vika -2300 vs Oprandi and just -1500 vs Vesnina if Oprandi is the better player?
You're not allowed to make an argument if you don't have stats to back it up. My point was, you claimed she's been dominate...yet she hadn't covered the +7.5 against any of her most recent opponents.
I must be crazy, cause I think Oprandi is ranked higher and has a 23-14 YTD compared to a lower ranked Vesnina with a 14-16 YTD
Really easy to argue against someone when you chime in 3/4 the way through the match. Haha. GL tonight buddy.
I chimed in on the Mayer thread before the match started that Oprandi would need a miracle to win 3 games in a set, in case you are so concerned.
You're not allowed to make an argument if you don't have stats to back it up. My point was, you claimed she's been dominate...yet she hadn't covered the +7.5 against any of her most recent opponents.
I must be crazy, cause I think Oprandi is ranked higher and has a 23-14 YTD compared to a lower ranked Vesnina with a 14-16 YTD
Really easy to argue against someone when you chime in 3/4 the way through the match. Haha. GL tonight buddy.
I chimed in on the Mayer thread before the match started that Oprandi would need a miracle to win 3 games in a set, in case you are so concerned.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.