| Author: |
[Systems & Strategies] Topic: Post All-Star Home System |
|
CKP22 |
RSI   View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 227
Location: |
#126 Posted: 9/20/2012 12:32:12 AM
Record: 21-0
Game 1: 16
Game 2: 4
Game 3: 1
Record since started tracking in 1999: 449-0.
436 wins within first three games. |
|
quote |
|
BookieCrusher88 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1281
Location: |
#127 Posted: 9/20/2012 9:57:20 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by CKP22:
I actually haven't done that. Perhaps at the end of the season I'll go back and look.
That may actually benefit us more IMO. Out of the 15 1st game wins this year, we may have been able to get a few more wins IF assuming the teams win 1 of their next 3 games and NOT get swept. |
|
quote |
|
jaime2309 |
RSI  |
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1774
Location: California |
#128 Posted: 9/20/2012 11:01:24 AM
(handshake) |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
bruin95 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 117
Location: |
#129 Posted: 9/22/2012 5:18:19 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by BookieCrusher88:
That may actually benefit us more IMO. Out of the 15 1st game wins this year, we may have been able to get a few more wins IF assuming the teams win 1 of their next 3 games and NOT get swept.
The record is 14-2. The losses were by the Yankees and Angels. The two losses were enough to make it unprofitable. The Yankee loss would have been enough to wipe out the 14 wins in one fell swoop. Would have lost around 16 units, on that series alone, if my calculations are correct. The system works as is. No need to get greedy. That's when the problems start. |
|
quote |
|
BookieCrusher88 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1281
Location: |
#130 Posted: 9/22/2012 6:41:29 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by bruin95:
The record is 14-2. The losses were by the Yankees and Angels. The two losses were enough to make it unprofitable. The Yankee loss would have been enough to wipe out the 14 wins in one fell swoop. Would have lost around 16 units, on that series alone, if my calculations are correct. The system works as is. No need to get greedy. That's when the problems start.
Ah thanks for the info.  |
|
quote |
|
|
|
CKP22 |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 227
Location: |
#131 Posted: 9/23/2012 11:48:10 PM
Record: 21-0
Game 1: 16
Game 2: 4
Game 3: 1
Record since started tracking in 1999: 449-0.
436 wins within first three games. |
|
quote |
|
GreenMachine22 |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2590
Location: United States |
#132 Posted: 9/24/2012 1:56:16 PM 
|
|
quote |
|
jaime2309 |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1774
Location: California |
#133 Posted: 9/24/2012 4:29:06 PM |
|
quote |
|
vi3t4lif3 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 336
Location: |
#134 Posted: 9/24/2012 6:15:36 PM |
|
quote |
|
CKP22 |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 227
Location: |
#135 Posted: 9/24/2012 11:29:25 PM
Record: 22-0
Game 1: 17
Game 2: 4
Game 3: 1
Record since started tracking in 1999: 450-0.
437 wins within first three games. |
|
quote |
|
jaime2309 |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1774
Location: California |
#136 Posted: 9/25/2012 12:59:59 AM |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
BookieCrusher88 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1281
Location: |
#137 Posted: 9/25/2012 8:39:19 AM  |
|
quote |
|
Ben51781 |
RSI  |
Prospect
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 51
Location: |
#138 Posted: 9/25/2012 9:13:42 PM
|
|
quote |
|
CKP22 |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 227
Location: |
#139 Posted: 9/28/2012 8:25:54 AM
Record: 22-0
Game 1: 17
Game 2: 4
Game 3: 1
Record since started tracking in 1999: 450-0.
437 wins within first three games. |
|
quote |
|
hardyvault |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 90
Location: Nevada |
#140 Posted: 9/28/2012 11:02:35 PM
|
|
quote |
|
bruin95 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 117
Location: |
#141 Posted: 9/29/2012 4:13:17 AM |
|
quote |
|
CKP22 |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 227
Location: |
#142 Posted: 9/29/2012 10:22:26 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by bruin95:
Could this be this systems first loss in over a decade? I've been saying all along that Pittsburgh didn't belong with the other teams in this system, despite meeting the criteria. Something to consider for next season is if a team that's been down for a long time and just happens to meet the criteria (ala Pittsburgh) might be filtered out. Pittsburgh hasn't had a winning season in over 20 years, but happened to have a great first half. We've all seen what has happened to them in the second half. They've had one of the worst records in baseball. While they haven't cost anyone anything, as yet, they have lost 4 A games and a B. Only one other team has even lost an A game this season. Just imagine how close the Mets came to meeting the criteria. Going into the last series before the break, they were 7 over .500 and playing the Cubs at home. A sweep would have put the Mets into the system. They would have been losers to the system, not once, but twice!! Getting swept at home in two 6 games series. In another home series, they didn't win their first game until game 5 of the homestand. Just something to consider if some surprise teams happen to make it next season.
Could it be the system's first in over a decade? Absolutely not.
This offseason, I do research prior to 1999 to see when the last loss was. Congrats to those that followed and made some money.
System complete for season with Pirates win in Game 2.
2012 Record: 23-0
Game 1: 17
Game 2: 5
Game 3: 1
Record since started tracking in 1999: 451-0.
438 wins within first three games.
|
|
quote |
|
CKP22 |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 227
Location: |
#143 Posted: 9/29/2012 10:24:24 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by bruin95:
Could this be this systems first loss in over a decade? I've been saying all along that Pittsburgh didn't belong with the other teams in this system, despite meeting the criteria. Something to consider for next season is if a team that's been down for a long time and just happens to meet the criteria (ala Pittsburgh) might be filtered out. Pittsburgh hasn't had a winning season in over 20 years, but happened to have a great first half. We've all seen what has happened to them in the second half. They've had one of the worst records in baseball. While they haven't cost anyone anything, as yet, they have lost 4 A games and a B. Only one other team has even lost an A game this season. Just imagine how close the Mets came to meeting the criteria. Going into the last series before the break, they were 7 over .500 and playing the Cubs at home. A sweep would have put the Mets into the system. They would have been losers to the system, not once, but twice!! Getting swept at home in two 6 games series. In another home series, they didn't win their first game until game 5 of the homestand. Just something to consider if some surprise teams happen to make it next season.
While teams do fit the system, I do filter out and don't play all of them. Didn't use the Pirates on any of their last three series. I usually unload on teams I trust.
|
|
quote |
|
Ben51781 |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 51
Location: |
#144 Posted: 9/30/2012 9:48:52 PM
|
|
quote |