COWBOYS won last week they will win again. im finally catching on to nfl after seein ghow th efirst 4 or so games turned out. been hot since go cowboys -2.5 buy half point
COWBOYS won last week they will win again. im finally catching on to nfl after seein ghow th efirst 4 or so games turned out. been hot since go cowboys -2.5 buy half point
Looks like its public vs sharp. My friend works at the Redrock casino sportsbook. He says all the public bets are on Dallas, and all the well known sharps that bet there are on Seattle.
Looks like its public vs sharp. My friend works at the Redrock casino sportsbook. He says all the public bets are on Dallas, and all the well known sharps that bet there are on Seattle.
Looks like its public vs sharp. My friend works at the Redrock casino sportsbook. He says all the public bets are on Dallas, and all the well known sharps that bet there are on Seattle.
Public is where all the small money bets are...the sharps are the ones who bet large. You don't think Vegas knows this? The line seems sketchy, but I still think cowboys win this one easy. The line could just be a trap to get the big money on Seattle....I'm just sayin.
Looks like its public vs sharp. My friend works at the Redrock casino sportsbook. He says all the public bets are on Dallas, and all the well known sharps that bet there are on Seattle.
Public is where all the small money bets are...the sharps are the ones who bet large. You don't think Vegas knows this? The line seems sketchy, but I still think cowboys win this one easy. The line could just be a trap to get the big money on Seattle....I'm just sayin.
Big money betters don't just guess if lines stink, and this one isn't that obvious. That's like saying the books moved the Panthers/Saints line the way they did to trick the sharps onto the Panthers. That's foolish. The big money betters have their own systems and are in a network to know where the real lines are. Networking=More Information=Real Line Discovery=>>Sharp Herding. If the big guys are pounding Seattle, they all know this as a fact.
Big money betters don't just guess if lines stink, and this one isn't that obvious. That's like saying the books moved the Panthers/Saints line the way they did to trick the sharps onto the Panthers. That's foolish. The big money betters have their own systems and are in a network to know where the real lines are. Networking=More Information=Real Line Discovery=>>Sharp Herding. If the big guys are pounding Seattle, they all know this as a fact.
Big money betters don't just guess if lines stink, and this one isn't that obvious. That's like saying the books moved the Panthers/Saints line the way they did to trick the sharps onto the Panthers. That's foolish. The big money betters have their own systems and are in a network to know where the real lines are. Networking=More Information=Real Line Discovery=>>Sharp Herding. If the big guys are pounding Seattle, they all know this as a fact.
Big money betters don't just guess if lines stink, and this one isn't that obvious. That's like saying the books moved the Panthers/Saints line the way they did to trick the sharps onto the Panthers. That's foolish. The big money betters have their own systems and are in a network to know where the real lines are. Networking=More Information=Real Line Discovery=>>Sharp Herding. If the big guys are pounding Seattle, they all know this as a fact.
Public is where all the small money bets are...the sharps are the ones who bet large. You don't think Vegas knows this? The line seems sketchy, but I still think cowboys win this one easy. The line could just be a trap to get the big money on Seattle....I'm just sayin.
Good luck fellas
So you basically you just acknowledged that the most accurate cappers are on Seattle, yet your opinion stands strong on Dallas? The whole point is that Vegas discovers who the sharps like, aka who is most likely to cover then they funnel the public money onto the other side. The bets are coming in at 8 Cowboys bets for every 1 Seahawks bet yet the line is indicating they need more money on Dallas?
I don't like to buy into line moves as the basis of my bets. I have this capped at Seattle -1 and I've locked in the +3 at my book. I think the -125 juice is comical, just sending the sheep in to get slaughtered.
Public is where all the small money bets are...the sharps are the ones who bet large. You don't think Vegas knows this? The line seems sketchy, but I still think cowboys win this one easy. The line could just be a trap to get the big money on Seattle....I'm just sayin.
Good luck fellas
So you basically you just acknowledged that the most accurate cappers are on Seattle, yet your opinion stands strong on Dallas? The whole point is that Vegas discovers who the sharps like, aka who is most likely to cover then they funnel the public money onto the other side. The bets are coming in at 8 Cowboys bets for every 1 Seahawks bet yet the line is indicating they need more money on Dallas?
I don't like to buy into line moves as the basis of my bets. I have this capped at Seattle -1 and I've locked in the +3 at my book. I think the -125 juice is comical, just sending the sheep in to get slaughtered.
So you basically you just acknowledged that the most accurate cappers are on Seattle, yet your opinion stands strong on Dallas? The whole point is that Vegas discovers who the sharps like, aka who is most likely to cover then they funnel the public money onto the other side. The bets are coming in at 8 Cowboys bets for every 1 Seahawks bet yet the line is indicating they need more money on Dallas?
I don't like to buy into line moves as the basis of my bets. I have this capped at Seattle -1 and I've locked in the +3 at my book. I think the -125 juice is comical, just sending the sheep in to get slaughtered.
Your going to see this line climb by Friday to push money back on the SEA side. The fact of the matter is, the Cowboys are in a good spot. 10 days rest to get over the emotional win and start the season 2-0. Vegas can't control what happens on the field, they can only control how people bet.
So you basically you just acknowledged that the most accurate cappers are on Seattle, yet your opinion stands strong on Dallas? The whole point is that Vegas discovers who the sharps like, aka who is most likely to cover then they funnel the public money onto the other side. The bets are coming in at 8 Cowboys bets for every 1 Seahawks bet yet the line is indicating they need more money on Dallas?
I don't like to buy into line moves as the basis of my bets. I have this capped at Seattle -1 and I've locked in the +3 at my book. I think the -125 juice is comical, just sending the sheep in to get slaughtered.
Your going to see this line climb by Friday to push money back on the SEA side. The fact of the matter is, the Cowboys are in a good spot. 10 days rest to get over the emotional win and start the season 2-0. Vegas can't control what happens on the field, they can only control how people bet.
So you basically you just acknowledged that the most accurate cappers are on Seattle, yet your opinion stands strong on Dallas? The whole point is that Vegas discovers who the sharps like, aka who is most likely to cover then they funnel the public money onto the other side. The bets are coming in at 8 Cowboys bets for every 1 Seahawks bet yet the line is indicating they need more money on Dallas?
I don't like to buy into line moves as the basis of my bets. I have this capped at Seattle -1 and I've locked in the +3 at my book. I think the -125 juice is comical, just sending the sheep in to get slaughtered.
I believe the line welcomes the small public bets, and while 8 to 1 might seem like a lot, it's not when you consider how much more the sharps bet. I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just bringing a different perspective.....I like Dallas here period.
So you basically you just acknowledged that the most accurate cappers are on Seattle, yet your opinion stands strong on Dallas? The whole point is that Vegas discovers who the sharps like, aka who is most likely to cover then they funnel the public money onto the other side. The bets are coming in at 8 Cowboys bets for every 1 Seahawks bet yet the line is indicating they need more money on Dallas?
I don't like to buy into line moves as the basis of my bets. I have this capped at Seattle -1 and I've locked in the +3 at my book. I think the -125 juice is comical, just sending the sheep in to get slaughtered.
I believe the line welcomes the small public bets, and while 8 to 1 might seem like a lot, it's not when you consider how much more the sharps bet. I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just bringing a different perspective.....I like Dallas here period.
Your going to see this line climb by Friday to push money back on the SEA side. The fact of the matter is, the Cowboys are in a good spot. 10 days rest to get over the emotional win and start the season 2-0. Vegas can't control what happens on the field, they can only control how people bet.
Your going to see this line climb by Friday to push money back on the SEA side. The fact of the matter is, the Cowboys are in a good spot. 10 days rest to get over the emotional win and start the season 2-0. Vegas can't control what happens on the field, they can only control how people bet.
I don't like to buy into line moves as the basis of my bets. I have this capped at Seattle -1 and I've locked in the +3 at my book. I think the -125 juice is comical, just sending the sheep in to get slaughtered.
I don't like to buy into line moves as the basis of my bets. I have this capped at Seattle -1 and I've locked in the +3 at my book. I think the -125 juice is comical, just sending the sheep in to get slaughtered.
Rookie qb? What in the world could he possibly do against the defense that just beat Eli. Like when they beat NO in the first round of playoffs few years ago? I had NO then, have Dallas now. It is okay, I am a square, not a sharp. If I lose, well you trap guys were right and I was wrong. It is cool, many other games to wager.
Rookie qb? What in the world could he possibly do against the defense that just beat Eli. Like when they beat NO in the first round of playoffs few years ago? I had NO then, have Dallas now. It is okay, I am a square, not a sharp. If I lose, well you trap guys were right and I was wrong. It is cool, many other games to wager.
Seattle may have a rookie qb. If you look closer its Seattles D and special teams that get it done at home. Everyone is on Cowboys D, but Seattles D is not no push over. They are pretty good too. I see a Defensive low scoring battle.
Seattle may have a rookie qb. If you look closer its Seattles D and special teams that get it done at home. Everyone is on Cowboys D, but Seattles D is not no push over. They are pretty good too. I see a Defensive low scoring battle.
This game reminds me of the Atl-KC line. From a square side it was obvious before the game started that Atl was just the better team. From the Sharp side there was this grand science of home opener, tough stadium, stats and records, etc. At the end of the day Atl won by 16.
My point is this line is set low and not DAL-6 or -7 because of that "grand science" that the books know the sharps are aware about. Of course the public is gonna pound the Cowboys. 10 days rest, just beat the defending superbowl champs in NY, "Romo's Revenge", rookie QB against Rob Ryan D and DeMarcus Ware, etc.
Thus, they open with -3 to prevent the "sharps" from capitalizing on the potential to win money on a possible close game because of the science of "the 12th man", home opener, Cowboys sleeping, mobile QB, "They beat NO in the playoffs", etc.
At the end of the day if the Cowboys show up prepared, they're going to win. What more would you need to prepare then 10 days of rest? Rookie QB's first NFL game against 3-4 and I'm sure they're ready to really introduce him to the NFL. In preseason he "lit it up" against second and third string, and we should all look to the Jets when we want to factor how preseason is different than regular season.
I won money on ARI against this team, and the line should be much bigger for the boys.
This game reminds me of the Atl-KC line. From a square side it was obvious before the game started that Atl was just the better team. From the Sharp side there was this grand science of home opener, tough stadium, stats and records, etc. At the end of the day Atl won by 16.
My point is this line is set low and not DAL-6 or -7 because of that "grand science" that the books know the sharps are aware about. Of course the public is gonna pound the Cowboys. 10 days rest, just beat the defending superbowl champs in NY, "Romo's Revenge", rookie QB against Rob Ryan D and DeMarcus Ware, etc.
Thus, they open with -3 to prevent the "sharps" from capitalizing on the potential to win money on a possible close game because of the science of "the 12th man", home opener, Cowboys sleeping, mobile QB, "They beat NO in the playoffs", etc.
At the end of the day if the Cowboys show up prepared, they're going to win. What more would you need to prepare then 10 days of rest? Rookie QB's first NFL game against 3-4 and I'm sure they're ready to really introduce him to the NFL. In preseason he "lit it up" against second and third string, and we should all look to the Jets when we want to factor how preseason is different than regular season.
I won money on ARI against this team, and the line should be much bigger for the boys.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.