Personnally i like the contest as it is......but your best bet would be to send a message directly to them instead of using the forum section...may get a quicker response to your inquery
Personnally i like the contest as it is......but your best bet would be to send a message directly to them instead of using the forum section...may get a quicker response to your inquery
Personnally i like the contest as it is......but your best bet would be to send a message directly to them instead of using the forum section...may get a quicker response to your inquery
Personnally i like the contest as it is......but your best bet would be to send a message directly to them instead of using the forum section...may get a quicker response to your inquery
Its like every body here is on the same page. Ive been thinkin the samething.
There is no undue advantage either way. In fact it would create more losers due to over saturation of options. Seems like they are inching in that direction, because now they are putting -130's out there. Which dog or fave wins about 50% of the time. Currently the teams they select.....the dogs have about a 5% edge over the faves as it relates to probability.
Its like every body here is on the same page. Ive been thinkin the samething.
There is no undue advantage either way. In fact it would create more losers due to over saturation of options. Seems like they are inching in that direction, because now they are putting -130's out there. Which dog or fave wins about 50% of the time. Currently the teams they select.....the dogs have about a 5% edge over the faves as it relates to probability.
I agree with Tuppy, I think the contest is fine the way it is. If on a certain day there are not enough selections for your fancy, take the day off. Surviving does require some patience as well as getting a lucky break every now and then in key situations.
Someone mentioned that being +100 is good in this contest. That is all relative to how many selections you have overall. For instance, I have seen 1 player with 3000 total selections, if he is 1550-1450, that is not a good enough ratio to be winning anything to wriite home about. Rather a better way of judging a player is by %. I think 55% is rock solid, and if I see players above this, I will not hesitate to follow them like a religion.
As always, good luck to all.
I agree with Tuppy, I think the contest is fine the way it is. If on a certain day there are not enough selections for your fancy, take the day off. Surviving does require some patience as well as getting a lucky break every now and then in key situations.
Someone mentioned that being +100 is good in this contest. That is all relative to how many selections you have overall. For instance, I have seen 1 player with 3000 total selections, if he is 1550-1450, that is not a good enough ratio to be winning anything to wriite home about. Rather a better way of judging a player is by %. I think 55% is rock solid, and if I see players above this, I will not hesitate to follow them like a religion.
As always, good luck to all.
I agree with Tuppy, I think the contest is fine the way it is. If on a certain day there are not enough selections for your fancy, take the day off. Surviving does require some patience as well as getting a lucky break every now and then in key situations.
Someone mentioned that being +100 is good in this contest. That is all relative to how many selections you have overall. For instance, I have seen 1 player with 3000 total selections, if he is 1550-1450, that is not a good enough ratio to be winning anything to wriite home about. Rather a better way of judging a player is by %. I think 55% is rock solid, and if I see players above this, I will not hesitate to follow them like a religion.
As always, good luck to all.
I agree with Tuppy, I think the contest is fine the way it is. If on a certain day there are not enough selections for your fancy, take the day off. Surviving does require some patience as well as getting a lucky break every now and then in key situations.
Someone mentioned that being +100 is good in this contest. That is all relative to how many selections you have overall. For instance, I have seen 1 player with 3000 total selections, if he is 1550-1450, that is not a good enough ratio to be winning anything to wriite home about. Rather a better way of judging a player is by %. I think 55% is rock solid, and if I see players above this, I will not hesitate to follow them like a religion.
As always, good luck to all.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.