Start with this: NE went 16-3 ATS and won their last 8 games ATS in a row. That's ATS, not SU, for a team where Vegas knows everyone is betting on them, and they were a cash cow every week for every square. Incomprehensible.
Top public plays cashed every single week except 2 or 3
Playoff favorites went 9-2 ATS. The only two dogs that won were bet by the public heavily (GB over Dal and Pitt over KC). Buried again.
Favorites of -6 or more during the season went 51-28 (64.6%). Historically they are 49.1%. Incomprehensible
Now the Super Bowl. Vegas/books lost on: Pats ATS, Pats ML, Over, Pats TT over, Pats 2H, Pats Live, 2H Over
Anyone saying "the books are fine" is clueless. Sportsbooks are already the least profitable game for casinos. Not only did they not profit this year, they lost a lot of money. Wait for the articles next week on the disaster this whole season was.
Comps are already nonexistent for sports bettors. Next time you go to Vegas, you'll be lucky to get 1 drink ticket for a $5,000 bet
Start with this: NE went 16-3 ATS and won their last 8 games ATS in a row. That's ATS, not SU, for a team where Vegas knows everyone is betting on them, and they were a cash cow every week for every square. Incomprehensible.
Top public plays cashed every single week except 2 or 3
Playoff favorites went 9-2 ATS. The only two dogs that won were bet by the public heavily (GB over Dal and Pitt over KC). Buried again.
Favorites of -6 or more during the season went 51-28 (64.6%). Historically they are 49.1%. Incomprehensible
Now the Super Bowl. Vegas/books lost on: Pats ATS, Pats ML, Over, Pats TT over, Pats 2H, Pats Live, 2H Over
Anyone saying "the books are fine" is clueless. Sportsbooks are already the least profitable game for casinos. Not only did they not profit this year, they lost a lot of money. Wait for the articles next week on the disaster this whole season was.
Comps are already nonexistent for sports bettors. Next time you go to Vegas, you'll be lucky to get 1 drink ticket for a $5,000 bet
Start with this: NE went 16-3 ATS and won their last 8 games ATS in a row. That's ATS, not SU, for a team where Vegas knows everyone is betting on them, and they were a cash cow every week for every square. Incomprehensible.
Top public plays cashed every single week except 2 or 3
Playoff favorites went 9-2 ATS. The only two dogs that won were bet by the public heavily (GB over Dal and Pitt over KC). Buried again.
Favorites of -6 or more during the season went 51-28 (64.6%). Historically they are 49.1%. Incomprehensible
Now the Super Bowl. Vegas/books lost on: Pats ATS, Pats ML, Over, Pats TT over, Pats 2H, Pats Live, 2H Over
Anyone saying "the books are fine" is clueless. Sportsbooks are already the least profitable game for casinos. Not only did they not profit this year, they lost a lot of money. Wait for the articles next week on the disaster this whole season was.
Comps are already nonexistent for sports bettors. Next time you go to Vegas, you'll be lucky to get 1 drink ticket for a $5,000 bet
uhhhh... you do realize that the financial performance of sportsbooks are not included on a casino's financial statement unless the casino personally owns and operates their own book, right?
Start with this: NE went 16-3 ATS and won their last 8 games ATS in a row. That's ATS, not SU, for a team where Vegas knows everyone is betting on them, and they were a cash cow every week for every square. Incomprehensible.
Top public plays cashed every single week except 2 or 3
Playoff favorites went 9-2 ATS. The only two dogs that won were bet by the public heavily (GB over Dal and Pitt over KC). Buried again.
Favorites of -6 or more during the season went 51-28 (64.6%). Historically they are 49.1%. Incomprehensible
Now the Super Bowl. Vegas/books lost on: Pats ATS, Pats ML, Over, Pats TT over, Pats 2H, Pats Live, 2H Over
Anyone saying "the books are fine" is clueless. Sportsbooks are already the least profitable game for casinos. Not only did they not profit this year, they lost a lot of money. Wait for the articles next week on the disaster this whole season was.
Comps are already nonexistent for sports bettors. Next time you go to Vegas, you'll be lucky to get 1 drink ticket for a $5,000 bet
uhhhh... you do realize that the financial performance of sportsbooks are not included on a casino's financial statement unless the casino personally owns and operates their own book, right?
uhhhh... you do realize that the financial performance of sportsbooks are not included on a casino's financial statement unless the casino personally owns and operates their own book, right?
Casinos, gaming companies, sportsbook conglomerate, whatever you want to call it. By far the least profitable game in Vegas. Clown
uhhhh... you do realize that the financial performance of sportsbooks are not included on a casino's financial statement unless the casino personally owns and operates their own book, right?
Casinos, gaming companies, sportsbook conglomerate, whatever you want to call it. By far the least profitable game in Vegas. Clown
I knew something was funny... They were giving free drink tickets if you bet $50 last year.. I was over there last week and they guy told me I had to place a $300 wager to get a single drink ticket lol.. crazy. Even tho were not at the books to get free drinks. It was just a perk you had because you were going to get 4-5 drink tickets when you made a $200 bet lol
I knew something was funny... They were giving free drink tickets if you bet $50 last year.. I was over there last week and they guy told me I had to place a $300 wager to get a single drink ticket lol.. crazy. Even tho were not at the books to get free drinks. It was just a perk you had because you were going to get 4-5 drink tickets when you made a $200 bet lol
Which is why you can get free rooms and comps from playing slots easily, not the case with sports betting. Comping free rooms to sports bettors is pretty unheard of.
Which is why you can get free rooms and comps from playing slots easily, not the case with sports betting. Comping free rooms to sports bettors is pretty unheard of.
Casinos, gaming companies, sportsbook conglomerate, whatever you want to call it. By far the least profitable game in Vegas. Clown
you're the only clown here you retarded square... you're the imbecile who doesn't even realize that sportsbooks are independently owned and operated... dumb fukk...
Casinos, gaming companies, sportsbook conglomerate, whatever you want to call it. By far the least profitable game in Vegas. Clown
you're the only clown here you retarded square... you're the imbecile who doesn't even realize that sportsbooks are independently owned and operated... dumb fukk...
The over went from 58.5 to 56.5 before the game. How could most bets be going to over?
That's all set by pinnacle, which all books follow. Because under got hit by sharps at pinnacle, doesn't mean the same applies to other books, especially in vegas
The over went from 58.5 to 56.5 before the game. How could most bets be going to over?
That's all set by pinnacle, which all books follow. Because under got hit by sharps at pinnacle, doesn't mean the same applies to other books, especially in vegas
Don't worry about the books, despite what they say, they're doing just fine- Worry about yourself, cause if you're betting on sports to make money, you're not
I'm getting a little tired of these "books took a beating this weekend" stories- They have no overhead, no production costs, hardly any employees and they collect between 5 and 30% (Parlays AKA Sucker Bets) on everything wagered.
Don't worry about the books, despite what they say, they're doing just fine- Worry about yourself, cause if you're betting on sports to make money, you're not
I'm getting a little tired of these "books took a beating this weekend" stories- They have no overhead, no production costs, hardly any employees and they collect between 5 and 30% (Parlays AKA Sucker Bets) on everything wagered.
"Nevada's sports books handled a record $138,480,136 in bets on Super Bowl LI, nearly $6 million more than last year's $132,545,587., according to the state's Gaming Control Board. The books showed a profit of $10,937,826 for a hold percentage of 7.9 percent. The book's total win is the seventh most since records started being kept in 1991."
"Nevada's sports books handled a record $138,480,136 in bets on Super Bowl LI, nearly $6 million more than last year's $132,545,587., according to the state's Gaming Control Board. The books showed a profit of $10,937,826 for a hold percentage of 7.9 percent. The book's total win is the seventh most since records started being kept in 1991."
10 mill in profits is not bad considering their most profitable was 15 mil when the Pats played the Eagles and the handle was much smaller back then. some books got burned, others did okay. William Hill lost 6 figures, Pats ML live killed them. Golden Nugget did really good with multiple 6 figure bet on the Falcons. some books were rooting for a touchdown and not a field goal in OT and wanted to avoid a push to give back refunds. obviously some of those profits were tied to ATL and UND money and.. they would also miss out on the vig if it were to push.
really its not the bookie's bloodbath most had imagined but if anything the Covers bloodbath was bleeding Falcon blood that Sunday night..
10 mill in profits is not bad considering their most profitable was 15 mil when the Pats played the Eagles and the handle was much smaller back then. some books got burned, others did okay. William Hill lost 6 figures, Pats ML live killed them. Golden Nugget did really good with multiple 6 figure bet on the Falcons. some books were rooting for a touchdown and not a field goal in OT and wanted to avoid a push to give back refunds. obviously some of those profits were tied to ATL and UND money and.. they would also miss out on the vig if it were to push.
really its not the bookie's bloodbath most had imagined but if anything the Covers bloodbath was bleeding Falcon blood that Sunday night..
10 mill in profits is not bad considering their most profitable was 15 mil when the Pats played the Eagles and the handle was much smaller back then. some books got burned, others did okay. William Hill lost 6 figures, Pats ML live killed them. Golden Nugget did really good with multiple 6 figure bet on the Falcons. some books were rooting for a touchdown and not a field goal in OT and wanted to avoid a push to give back refunds. obviously some of those profits were tied to ATL and UND money and.. they would also miss out on the vig if it were to push.
really its not the bookie's bloodbath most had imagined but if anything the Covers bloodbath was bleeding Falcon blood that Sunday night..
Love it when people bring the facts to set the know-it-all's making posts with misleading titles straight.
10 mill in profits is not bad considering their most profitable was 15 mil when the Pats played the Eagles and the handle was much smaller back then. some books got burned, others did okay. William Hill lost 6 figures, Pats ML live killed them. Golden Nugget did really good with multiple 6 figure bet on the Falcons. some books were rooting for a touchdown and not a field goal in OT and wanted to avoid a push to give back refunds. obviously some of those profits were tied to ATL and UND money and.. they would also miss out on the vig if it were to push.
really its not the bookie's bloodbath most had imagined but if anything the Covers bloodbath was bleeding Falcon blood that Sunday night..
Love it when people bring the facts to set the know-it-all's making posts with misleading titles straight.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.