The nation will be hearing about a 340lbs true freshman DT Dexter Lawrence come Thursday. He's going to wreak havic with the dive option. I expect Clemson to cover.
The nation will be hearing about a 340lbs true freshman DT Dexter Lawrence come Thursday. He's going to wreak havic with the dive option. I expect Clemson to cover.
The public all over Clemson early and the line dropped.. that tells me the sharp money is on the Jackets... only regret is i didnt grab the line at +10.5 ... Jackets +10 ... I'll probably end up buying the hook.
The public all over Clemson early and the line dropped.. that tells me the sharp money is on the Jackets... only regret is i didnt grab the line at +10.5 ... Jackets +10 ... I'll probably end up buying the hook.
I think that the Yellow Jackets will cover the points, because Clemson lost 6 starters from last year and just maybe Georgia Tech can pull a win out of this game, hopefully. A BIG HELLO TO MY BUDDY, Colonejim ....
I think that the Yellow Jackets will cover the points, because Clemson lost 6 starters from last year and just maybe Georgia Tech can pull a win out of this game, hopefully. A BIG HELLO TO MY BUDDY, Colonejim ....
The public all over Clemson early and the line dropped.. that tells me the sharp money is on the Jackets... only regret is i didnt grab the line at +10.5 ... Jackets +10 ... I'll probably end up buying the hook.
Thanks, sjon. People here don't seem to get that it's reading the lines that pick winners. Not knowing the game.
It doesn't really matter if you think the Clemson o-line is garbage or that Tech's secondary is weak. Vegas knows that too and it is all worked into the line.
Line opened at 10 (10.5 and 11 at some books). Two-thirds of the public is on Clemson, so the line should move up to equal out the money. But it's down to 9.5! Why do the books want to pull more bets to Clemson? Either (1) the books know something that I don't or (2) smart money is going big on Tech and they know something that I don't.
Reverse line movement doesn't lie (well, at least most of the time)
GEORGIA TECH +9.5
BTW, posts that just say "<Some TEAM> will cover" don't really lend much to the discussion either.
The public all over Clemson early and the line dropped.. that tells me the sharp money is on the Jackets... only regret is i didnt grab the line at +10.5 ... Jackets +10 ... I'll probably end up buying the hook.
Thanks, sjon. People here don't seem to get that it's reading the lines that pick winners. Not knowing the game.
It doesn't really matter if you think the Clemson o-line is garbage or that Tech's secondary is weak. Vegas knows that too and it is all worked into the line.
Line opened at 10 (10.5 and 11 at some books). Two-thirds of the public is on Clemson, so the line should move up to equal out the money. But it's down to 9.5! Why do the books want to pull more bets to Clemson? Either (1) the books know something that I don't or (2) smart money is going big on Tech and they know something that I don't.
Reverse line movement doesn't lie (well, at least most of the time)
GEORGIA TECH +9.5
BTW, posts that just say "<Some TEAM> will cover" don't really lend much to the discussion either.
Clemson is a much better team in general. Sure they lost a bunch of guys to the NFL, but when you still have a dynamic QB and running back...hard to bet against. Dabo Swinney's team stopped the triple option last year and I am sure he didn't forget this year. Plus they beat them 43-24 and had 2 lost fumbles while GT had zero TO. I can only imagine how bad GT would have been beat if they had zero turn overs. GT struggled against a decent defense in BC and barely escaped with a win. Clemson's D is better than BC's so I expect GT to struggle. Clemson by 2 Td's easy!
Clemson is a much better team in general. Sure they lost a bunch of guys to the NFL, but when you still have a dynamic QB and running back...hard to bet against. Dabo Swinney's team stopped the triple option last year and I am sure he didn't forget this year. Plus they beat them 43-24 and had 2 lost fumbles while GT had zero TO. I can only imagine how bad GT would have been beat if they had zero turn overs. GT struggled against a decent defense in BC and barely escaped with a win. Clemson's D is better than BC's so I expect GT to struggle. Clemson by 2 Td's easy!
Clemson's coach knows GT's new secondary is their weakest link. They know they play GT each year so they do practice for the triple threat. GT has played a bunch of chumps so far. Clemson by two touchdowns.
Clemson's coach knows GT's new secondary is their weakest link. They know they play GT each year so they do practice for the triple threat. GT has played a bunch of chumps so far. Clemson by two touchdowns.
Going to be a tough one for the Yellowjackets. They are going to need a break or 2 or else it may be lights out. I was leaning Clemson but I'll be rooting for my amigo.
Going to be a tough one for the Yellowjackets. They are going to need a break or 2 or else it may be lights out. I was leaning Clemson but I'll be rooting for my amigo.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.