I don't know if this has been posted here, but another site is reporting that all of these bets, winners and losers, are being voided by Vegas because of the canceled game. They didn't play 82...so no action.
I don't know if this has been posted here, but another site is reporting that all of these bets, winners and losers, are being voided by Vegas because of the canceled game. They didn't play 82...so no action.
I don't know if this has been posted here, but another site is reporting that all of these bets, winners and losers, are being voided by Vegas because of the canceled game. They didn't play 82...so no action.
I don't know if this has been posted here, but another site is reporting that all of these bets, winners and losers, are being voided by Vegas because of the canceled game. They didn't play 82...so no action.
That is true. I happened to catch an interview with Jay Hornegy (sportsbook director at the LVH) yesterday where they spent a good deal of time discussing the ins and outs of it.
Bottom line: it's stated in the rulebook and in the fine print on the back of the ticketsgenerated for all properties in Vegas, that the wager is based (and handicapped) on a full 82 game slate.
He also mentioned in passing that it cost his operation five figures due to the refunds. Believe it or not.
I don't know if this has been posted here, but another site is reporting that all of these bets, winners and losers, are being voided by Vegas because of the canceled game. They didn't play 82...so no action.
That is true. I happened to catch an interview with Jay Hornegy (sportsbook director at the LVH) yesterday where they spent a good deal of time discussing the ins and outs of it.
Bottom line: it's stated in the rulebook and in the fine print on the back of the ticketsgenerated for all properties in Vegas, that the wager is based (and handicapped) on a full 82 game slate.
He also mentioned in passing that it cost his operation five figures due to the refunds. Believe it or not.
I think they were both @ 50.5
The people on the Celtics under got screwed, but Indy has 49 wins so that could've been a lot more meaningful.
I think they were both @ 50.5
The people on the Celtics under got screwed, but Indy has 49 wins so that could've been a lot more meaningful.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.