Musicmatt1 43-47-1
NY Knicks +1
UTAH Jazz -11
GS Warriors -9
I personally think the Grizzlies are pretenders and I am not sure how a team with only 1 offensive weapon competes in the playoffs. I think clinched playoff teams that rolled until now will shut it down (unless they are chasing a streak a la Heat), and teams that hobbled in to the end will play harder to gain momentum in the playoffs. Knicks are one of those teams looking to build momentum. Said it earlier, Grizzlies are 2-4 straight up on the road since March 11, and on an 0-4 run.
Warriors and Jazz because Home teams fighting for playoff
spots against teams out of playoff chase are 9 of 13 ATS (the losses were
Nuggets (twice), Heat, and Lakers.) That
is 9 of 10 for teams that have not clinched.
Musicmatt1 43-47-1
NY Knicks +1
UTAH Jazz -11
GS Warriors -9
I personally think the Grizzlies are pretenders and I am not sure how a team with only 1 offensive weapon competes in the playoffs. I think clinched playoff teams that rolled until now will shut it down (unless they are chasing a streak a la Heat), and teams that hobbled in to the end will play harder to gain momentum in the playoffs. Knicks are one of those teams looking to build momentum. Said it earlier, Grizzlies are 2-4 straight up on the road since March 11, and on an 0-4 run.
Warriors and Jazz because Home teams fighting for playoff
spots against teams out of playoff chase are 9 of 13 ATS (the losses were
Nuggets (twice), Heat, and Lakers.) That
is 9 of 10 for teams that have not clinched.
actually there was rlm on this line, my book opened at 186.5 and went down to 184.5 and is now going back up, probably because of the public siding with the over as well....not sure about the over.
actually there was rlm on this line, my book opened at 186.5 and went down to 184.5 and is now going back up, probably because of the public siding with the over as well....not sure about the over.
actually there was rlm on this line, my book opened at 186.5 and went down to 184.5 and is now going back up, probably because of the public siding with the over as well....not sure about the over.
actually there was rlm on this line, my book opened at 186.5 and went down to 184.5 and is now going back up, probably because of the public siding with the over as well....not sure about the over.
actually there was rlm on this line, my book opened at 186.5 and went down to 184.5 and is now going back up, probably because of the public siding with the over as well....not sure about the over.
actually there was rlm on this line, my book opened at 186.5 and went down to 184.5 and is now going back up, probably because of the public siding with the over as well....not sure about the over.
I know it's crazy!! bound to be some traps for sure....
I know it's crazy!! bound to be some traps for sure....
I know it's crazy!! bound to be some traps for sure....
I know it's crazy!! bound to be some traps for sure....
I didn't say I was playing it, ..yet, but that's my lean, there is rlm with both the side and the total, the rlm will not hit on both I'm sure, I don't like memphis and the over doesn't seem right , i like better knicks and the under, makes more sense to me with the trends.Plus your theory about teams that have clinched a playoff spot playing on the road comes into effect here i believe.
I didn't say I was playing it, ..yet, but that's my lean, there is rlm with both the side and the total, the rlm will not hit on both I'm sure, I don't like memphis and the over doesn't seem right , i like better knicks and the under, makes more sense to me with the trends.Plus your theory about teams that have clinched a playoff spot playing on the road comes into effect here i believe.
I didn't say I was playing it, ..yet, but that's my lean, there is rlm with both the side and the total, the rlm will not hit on both I'm sure, I don't like memphis and the over doesn't seem right , i like better knicks and the under, makes more sense to me with the trends.Plus your theory about teams that have clinched a playoff spot playing on the road comes into effect here i believe.
that would be on the side and not the totals, haven't they been losing more often than not?
I didn't say I was playing it, ..yet, but that's my lean, there is rlm with both the side and the total, the rlm will not hit on both I'm sure, I don't like memphis and the over doesn't seem right , i like better knicks and the under, makes more sense to me with the trends.Plus your theory about teams that have clinched a playoff spot playing on the road comes into effect here i believe.
that would be on the side and not the totals, haven't they been losing more often than not?
actually there was rlm on this line, my book opened at 186.5 and went down to 184.5 and is now going back up, probably because of the public siding with the over as well....not sure about the over.
actually there was rlm on this line, my book opened at 186.5 and went down to 184.5 and is now going back up, probably because of the public siding with the over as well....not sure about the over.
-boston/cleveland opened:193.5 went up to 195.5 and is now at 194.5
-knicks/memphis as mentioned above sides and total
-atl/tor seems to be also side and total
-houston/indiana line moving with houston public on indiana
-san antonio/denver line moving with san antonio public on denver
there are some more lines that have gone the opposite way by a pt and that have moved back up 1/2 pt, so still 1/2 point under or over the original line...
I like san antonio and houston.....
-boston/cleveland opened:193.5 went up to 195.5 and is now at 194.5
-knicks/memphis as mentioned above sides and total
-atl/tor seems to be also side and total
-houston/indiana line moving with houston public on indiana
-san antonio/denver line moving with san antonio public on denver
there are some more lines that have gone the opposite way by a pt and that have moved back up 1/2 pt, so still 1/2 point under or over the original line...
I like san antonio and houston.....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.