I'M TELLING YOU ALL I WILL KILL IT TONIGHT AND HAVE AN INCREDIBLE LEAN AT 9:00 TONIGHT AND AGAIN IT WILL BE LARGE. THE FU*KING TEASE KILLED ME AND I HIT BOTH BIG POD'S LAST NIGHT. I AM DETERMINED AND WILL MOVE FOWARD WITH A NEW THREAD. MY BUDDY IS IMPLEMENTING HIS NEW SYSTEM THAT WILL TECHNICALLY GO INTO EFFECT TOMORROW. IT IS FROM A CO WORKER OF HIS AND IT IS SAID TO BE HITTING AT 70% IN THE PAST 30 DAYS
I'M TELLING YOU ALL I WILL KILL IT TONIGHT AND HAVE AN INCREDIBLE LEAN AT 9:00 TONIGHT AND AGAIN IT WILL BE LARGE. THE FU*KING TEASE KILLED ME AND I HIT BOTH BIG POD'S LAST NIGHT. I AM DETERMINED AND WILL MOVE FOWARD WITH A NEW THREAD. MY BUDDY IS IMPLEMENTING HIS NEW SYSTEM THAT WILL TECHNICALLY GO INTO EFFECT TOMORROW. IT IS FROM A CO WORKER OF HIS AND IT IS SAID TO BE HITTING AT 70% IN THE PAST 30 DAYS
He just needs to wait for Poolio to post his plays than he will have his plays of the day...Make your own picks and quit trying to take credit for pool's picks...The only plays you win are not even yours
He just needs to wait for Poolio to post his plays than he will have his plays of the day...Make your own picks and quit trying to take credit for pool's picks...The only plays you win are not even yours
I can't understand how i win every night with my teasers and you lose. I cringed when I saw St Mary's in the teaser yesterday....when I saw C mich I said "not bad, he should have a decent shot" and it was as close as they get.
Why you didn't use Western ILL, ND st, or Davidson or even IPFW is beyond me. Teams that are either in or watching from home. St Mary's was already in, was playing #1 and had an emotional win previously where they looked like complete crap. Why you backed them in that spot is unimaginable.
I can't understand how i win every night with my teasers and you lose. I cringed when I saw St Mary's in the teaser yesterday....when I saw C mich I said "not bad, he should have a decent shot" and it was as close as they get.
Why you didn't use Western ILL, ND st, or Davidson or even IPFW is beyond me. Teams that are either in or watching from home. St Mary's was already in, was playing #1 and had an emotional win previously where they looked like complete crap. Why you backed them in that spot is unimaginable.
AGAIN NOW TONIGHT IS A PRE-TRIAL OF THIS AND IT IS TECNICALLY SET FOR THE BEGINNING OF MARCH MADNESS WE ARE TOLD BUT IT WAS BROUGHT INTO PLAY OVER THE PAST 30 DAYS. I DON'T TRUST ANYONE BUT MY BUDDY AND I WILL GIVE IT A WHIRL TONIGHT. THERE CAN BE FINE TUNING OF IT AS FAR AS WHO IS ADVANCING WITH THERE POWER POINTS BEING WORKED INTO THERE HOME AND AWAY POWERPOINTS THROUGHOUT THE SEASON. I DO NOT KNOW MUCH MORE ABOUT THIS BUT WE WILL WAIT AND SEE
AGAIN NOW TONIGHT IS A PRE-TRIAL OF THIS AND IT IS TECNICALLY SET FOR THE BEGINNING OF MARCH MADNESS WE ARE TOLD BUT IT WAS BROUGHT INTO PLAY OVER THE PAST 30 DAYS. I DON'T TRUST ANYONE BUT MY BUDDY AND I WILL GIVE IT A WHIRL TONIGHT. THERE CAN BE FINE TUNING OF IT AS FAR AS WHO IS ADVANCING WITH THERE POWER POINTS BEING WORKED INTO THERE HOME AND AWAY POWERPOINTS THROUGHOUT THE SEASON. I DO NOT KNOW MUCH MORE ABOUT THIS BUT WE WILL WAIT AND SEE
AGAIN NOW TONIGHT IS A PRE-TRIAL OF THIS AND IT IS TECNICALLY SET FOR THE BEGINNING OF MARCH MADNESS WE ARE TOLD BUT IT WAS BROUGHT INTO PLAY OVER THE PAST 30 DAYS. I DON'T TRUST ANYONE BUT MY BUDDY AND I WILL GIVE IT A WHIRL TONIGHT. THERE CAN BE FINE TUNING OF IT AS FAR AS WHO IS ADVANCING WITH THERE POWER POINTS BEING WORKED INTO THERE HOME AND AWAY POWERPOINTS THROUGHOUT THE SEASON. I DO NOT KNOW MUCH MORE ABOUT THIS BUT WE WILL WAIT AND SEE
Well, thus far he hasn't been bringing you to the promise land.
AGAIN NOW TONIGHT IS A PRE-TRIAL OF THIS AND IT IS TECNICALLY SET FOR THE BEGINNING OF MARCH MADNESS WE ARE TOLD BUT IT WAS BROUGHT INTO PLAY OVER THE PAST 30 DAYS. I DON'T TRUST ANYONE BUT MY BUDDY AND I WILL GIVE IT A WHIRL TONIGHT. THERE CAN BE FINE TUNING OF IT AS FAR AS WHO IS ADVANCING WITH THERE POWER POINTS BEING WORKED INTO THERE HOME AND AWAY POWERPOINTS THROUGHOUT THE SEASON. I DO NOT KNOW MUCH MORE ABOUT THIS BUT WE WILL WAIT AND SEE
Well, thus far he hasn't been bringing you to the promise land.
I can't understand how i win every night with my teasers and you lose. I cringed when I saw St Mary's in the teaser yesterday....when I saw C mich I said "not bad, he should have a decent shot" and it was as close as they get.
Why you didn't use Western ILL, ND st, or Davidson or even IPFW is beyond me. Teams that are either in or watching from home. St Mary's was already in, was playing #1 and had an emotional win previously where they looked like complete crap. Why you backed them in that spot is unimaginable.
Who made you his consigliere? Were not yall internet buddies a few weeks ago and now you have joined the bash trian? That's weak, I'm trying to read this for a laugh; not your fishing for comments on how you did on your 38 teasers the night before. Bottom line, reading two habitual teaser bettors giving each other advise makes me cranky.
I don't take notice of the guys plays, but what makes St Mary's such a bad play? If anything, it was a good spot. Fading the overall number one team in it's first primetime spot on top of the mountain game isnt such a bad play. To say Gonzaga was the play is absolute squareness at it's peak. St Mary's suffered an early injury and couldnt sink their 3 ball which would have made all the difference vs a terrible perimeter defensive team in the Zags. It wasnt a bad play. A losing one, but one I would normally be on more times than not.
Also, your logic of playing teams that must win or watch from home is flawed. Playing the "must win" angle is about is cliche and amature as it gets. More times than not, it fails. Young players with too much pressure tend to fold in clutch spots. Just dont see this angle. At all.
Totally disagree with this guys way of betting, but to single one play as a Monday morning quarterback is weaksauce. And you used to be his buddy, Judas.
I can't understand how i win every night with my teasers and you lose. I cringed when I saw St Mary's in the teaser yesterday....when I saw C mich I said "not bad, he should have a decent shot" and it was as close as they get.
Why you didn't use Western ILL, ND st, or Davidson or even IPFW is beyond me. Teams that are either in or watching from home. St Mary's was already in, was playing #1 and had an emotional win previously where they looked like complete crap. Why you backed them in that spot is unimaginable.
Who made you his consigliere? Were not yall internet buddies a few weeks ago and now you have joined the bash trian? That's weak, I'm trying to read this for a laugh; not your fishing for comments on how you did on your 38 teasers the night before. Bottom line, reading two habitual teaser bettors giving each other advise makes me cranky.
I don't take notice of the guys plays, but what makes St Mary's such a bad play? If anything, it was a good spot. Fading the overall number one team in it's first primetime spot on top of the mountain game isnt such a bad play. To say Gonzaga was the play is absolute squareness at it's peak. St Mary's suffered an early injury and couldnt sink their 3 ball which would have made all the difference vs a terrible perimeter defensive team in the Zags. It wasnt a bad play. A losing one, but one I would normally be on more times than not.
Also, your logic of playing teams that must win or watch from home is flawed. Playing the "must win" angle is about is cliche and amature as it gets. More times than not, it fails. Young players with too much pressure tend to fold in clutch spots. Just dont see this angle. At all.
Totally disagree with this guys way of betting, but to single one play as a Monday morning quarterback is weaksauce. And you used to be his buddy, Judas.
Who made you his consigliere? Were not yall internet buddies a few weeks ago and now you have joined the bash trian? That's weak, I'm trying to read this for a laugh; not your fishing for comments on how you did on your 38 teasers the night before. Bottom line, reading two habitual teaser bettors giving each other advise makes me cranky.
I don't take notice of the guys plays, but what makes St Mary's such a bad play? If anything, it was a good spot. Fading the overall number one team in it's first primetime spot on top of the mountain game isnt such a bad play. To say Gonzaga was the play is absolute squareness at it's peak. St Mary's suffered an early injury and couldnt sink their 3 ball which would have made all the difference vs a terrible perimeter defensive team in the Zags. It wasnt a bad play. A losing one, but one I would normally be on more times than not.
Also, your logic of playing teams that must win or watch from home is flawed. Playing the "must win" angle is about is cliche and amature as it gets. More times than not, it fails. Young players with too much pressure tend to fold in clutch spots. Just dont see this angle. At all.
Totally disagree with this guys way of betting, but to single one play as a Monday morning quarterback is weaksauce. And you used to be his buddy, Judas.
Tease on teaser.
Just like Iona last night, I thought the posts here couldn't get any stranger. Thank you for proving me wrong.
weaksauce? Judas? Buckwheat? Not that there isn't anything wrong with that, are you a foreigner?
Who made you his consigliere? Were not yall internet buddies a few weeks ago and now you have joined the bash trian? That's weak, I'm trying to read this for a laugh; not your fishing for comments on how you did on your 38 teasers the night before. Bottom line, reading two habitual teaser bettors giving each other advise makes me cranky.
I don't take notice of the guys plays, but what makes St Mary's such a bad play? If anything, it was a good spot. Fading the overall number one team in it's first primetime spot on top of the mountain game isnt such a bad play. To say Gonzaga was the play is absolute squareness at it's peak. St Mary's suffered an early injury and couldnt sink their 3 ball which would have made all the difference vs a terrible perimeter defensive team in the Zags. It wasnt a bad play. A losing one, but one I would normally be on more times than not.
Also, your logic of playing teams that must win or watch from home is flawed. Playing the "must win" angle is about is cliche and amature as it gets. More times than not, it fails. Young players with too much pressure tend to fold in clutch spots. Just dont see this angle. At all.
Totally disagree with this guys way of betting, but to single one play as a Monday morning quarterback is weaksauce. And you used to be his buddy, Judas.
Tease on teaser.
Just like Iona last night, I thought the posts here couldn't get any stranger. Thank you for proving me wrong.
weaksauce? Judas? Buckwheat? Not that there isn't anything wrong with that, are you a foreigner?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.