Sarah J. Phillips: Keep your hands and your GOYs to yourself

Most men try to impress me with unsolicited betting advice when they find out I’m a sports bettor myself.

They usually have a myriad of theories on how they win and how much money they have. Even though they’re still driving a 1987 Toyota Tacoma, they swear they can rival Billy Walters when it comes to picking winners.

Apparently, they want to keep their winnings discreet. Right.

I usually deal with this type of situation on a once-a-week cycle. In cities where testosterone levels are higher and small-man syndrome is more rampant, I may have to deal with it two or three times.
Sarah J. Phillips is fading your "Game of the Year"
Last week was no different.

I was approached by a man, who we’ll call Joe Public, during Game 6 of the Thunder-Grizzlies series. He claimed to be a professional poker player and had a substantial bankroll. As usual, he beat his chest like most men do and exclaimed, “Put $10,000 on the Thunder and thank me later.”

From my experiences, if anyone ever tells you to make a wager and “thank them later,” it’s small-man code for calling it the “Game of the Year” - automatic fade material. Avoid at all costs.

I laughed inside and told him I would take the Grizzlies for $2,500 versus him. His GOY type comments only solidified my confidence in Memphis.

The first half was dominated by the Thunder. The Grizzlies went into the half down 10 points, and I had listened to an infinite amount of “I told you so’s” from Joe.

If anyone you meet explicitly uses the term “I told you so,” it’s the same as them having small hands and feet. Catch my drift?

I remained confident in the Grizzlies and they delivered early in the second half. I’m pretty reserved when my side begins to climb back and overtake a wager, so I sat in my chair and sipped on some cold water.

Who am I kidding? I was going nuts!

Every time Zach Randolph put up a shot, I was yelling “Z BOOOOO” and making bomb blasting noises as the ball went through the basket. My mom would have been so proud.

But when it came to settle the wager, Joe was nowhere to be found.

I bet you didn’t see that coming. But, I did.

I assume he didn’t have the money and he probably didn’t enjoy losing a wager to a woman. It’s a double whammy, but I’m used to it. Sometimes I want to win for monetary gain, and other times I’m simply looking to solidify women among men as bettors.

Money can’t buy respect, winning does.

Bomb blast Joe. Mission accomplished.

SJP Playoff Pick: Miami Heat +2.5

If you have any feedback or suggestions for our Editorial Team, please contact us at Editorial

            share   SHARE   rss   RSS FEED   email   EMAIL   print   PRINT
Hide All Responses
avatar

Posted by HugeBallz
1 year ago

"Every time Zach Randolph put up a shot, I was yelling “Z BOOOOO” and making bomb blasting noises as the ball went through the basket. My mom would have been so proud. But when it came to settle the wager, Joe was nowhere to be found. I bet you didn’t see that coming. But, I did." No we did not see that coming but it's no surprise. What are you 6? You are a terrible winner. You actually deserved to get stiffed.
avatar

Posted by mikeychips22
1 year ago

orry I missed this before I had off season summer workouts today but I really enjoyed your article. I especially got a good laugh at the "I told you so" before the game is over. It is my ultimate pet peeve and ultimately why I don't give my friends anymore picks when they ask. The constant nagging when a game is going bad is awful. Good luck on your pick tonight and sorry that guy didn't pay, kinda sucks....
avatar

Posted by Lttlmac
1 year ago

Refs weon this game, Queen James still SuCKS
avatar

Posted by BrandenLang
2 years ago

Took the Dirk under straight to the bank $$$$ Good call on the Giants tho. BOL this weekend
avatar

Posted by DavidGurney
2 years ago

You're not a real sports bettor unless you bet baseball,a sport that demands attention 24-7.
avatar

Posted by Tad
2 years ago

Q: Why did the woman get hit by a car? A: Not sure. Why was there a car in the KITCHEN? :) ... could not resist
avatar

Posted by mylife23
2 years ago

how do you know she didn't bet with the book? Maybe it was just side wagering to pass the time. What's 2 grand to SJP? Nothinggggg :)
avatar

Posted by badreligion
2 years ago

might be the dumbest things i've ever read you gave a guy a 2500 dollar free roll instead of betting with the book you aren't doing any favors to women in sports, nor women in general, just showing people how stupid you are
avatar

Posted by SarahJPhilli
2 years ago

Off for the night. I'll be on my Covers Twitter. Don't forget to follow the Covers Team @CoversSports and follow me at @Covers_SJP. Have a good night everyone and good luck with your picks!
avatar

Posted by mvp3202
2 years ago

Hey Sarah J is my Home girl!! I love this article!!! :) she made me join covers hehe but i like her!!
avatar

Posted by SarahJPhilli
2 years ago

I gotta take off for awhile. I'll be back during the Mavericks/Thunder Game 2. Feel free to leave comments and I'll respond to them as soon as I'm back. XOXO, SJP
avatar

Posted by Syddigs
2 years ago

" I bet you didn’t see that coming. But, I did. " If you did see that coming then why did you not ask to see at least some of his bankroll that would have covered your bet? You saw it coming and still allowed it to happen. You Sir ( yes Sir ) have shit for brains and are dumber than the posters here who think you are an actual woman and the woman in the pics. And that is borderline retarded.
avatar

Posted by SarahJPhilli
2 years ago

I wasn't surprised that he didn't pay his debt. I obviously expected a settlement when the wager was made, but it didn't surprise me that he was a dead beat. A dead beat bettor isn't uncommon.
avatar

Posted by SarahJPhilli
2 years ago

The whole "you're not a woman" thing got old a month ago. Please catch up. It's boring. Make fun of my columns. I can respect that.
avatar

Posted by Syddigs
2 years ago

" I obviously expected a settlement when the wager was made, but it didn't surprise me that he was a dead beat. " So which one is it? You OBVIOUSLY expected a settlement but weren't surprised when he didn't? How can you obviously expect something to happen then not be surprised when it doesn't? Secondly, who the fuck takes a bet from a stranger that he/she doesn't know from a bar of soap? Who the fuck takes a bet without seeing some of the bankroll? Didn't you say in an earlier column that you know more about sports betting than all of us? Care to retract that after these two absolutely moronic errors that not even the most naive square would make?
avatar

Posted by thomas6512
2 years ago

She's not a female, u guy's r nut's !
avatar

Posted by SarahJPhilli
2 years ago

LOL! Holy moly. Check out those apostrophes---good effort on them. Better luck next time.
avatar

Posted by thomas6512
2 years ago

SJP, R U a female ?
avatar

Posted by SarahJPhilli
2 years ago

UHHH . . .
avatar

Posted by eliminat0r85
2 years ago

c'mon SJP you talk about dirk to much, hes not gonna get soft fouls like crawford gave him all series not to mention he's not gonna shoot almost 90% every game. hes a 53% shooter in the playoffs so far, yes he had a great game but he is not gonna be able to pull that play off all series, and even with what he did the thunder we're still in the game the whole way through. I give OKC a solid chance to win tonight and there is some decent value on the ML. I hope it goes up a little bit though. They will be better prepared for the zone tonight and be able to attack it more effectively. This will be a solid series as long as both coaches continue to make quality adjustments, i expect a different game plan out of both teams tonight, even carlisle knows they can't win with the way they played in game 1 if dirk wasn't huge for them.
avatar

Posted by SarahJPhilli
2 years ago

The Thunder don't play shutdown defense, don't shoot the 3 well, and can't contain Dirk. What am I missing here? Enlighten me. They have to win a shootout and hope Dallas is missing their shots to beat Dallas right now.
avatar

Posted by SarahJPhilli
2 years ago

I'm not saying it's impossible, but I need to see what OKC is planning on doing to overcome those odds.
avatar

Posted by eliminat0r85
2 years ago

Just over 30% for 3 pointers isn't bad actually. Yes dallas has been better recently but over the course of a season they aren't bad. Also OKC doesn't play a shutdown defense, their defense is more about limiting possessions then blocking shots. They want to make dallas take the tough shots work the glass and run up the floor. They are not a shut down defense team. I would say they did part of their job pretty well by holding dallas to 73 FG attempts. However dallas made 39 of the 73, thats not a winning formula for OKC, they need to keep teams under 50% or just above 50% in FG's to have a chance at winning. Look i get it dallas has this immense bandwagon of followers now because they swept the lakers and everyone thought the lakers were going all the way. Those people were foolish and the people who think dallas is just gonna walk all over OKC as well are foolish, the season series was pretty even. It's hard to base something on one game of a series especially that when taking everything in context of the first game they were pretty much even. Only 2 players hurt OKC in the first game dirk and terry, they are gonna need a much better team effort going forward. Durant is really the only one who hurt dallas, westbrook was trying to make too many jumpers 3-15 from the floor is horrible at best, the only time he was effective was when he was able to drive the lane and got some cheap FT's. Also the thunder can contain dirk, again you're basing you're facts off one game, one game i might add where his performance was amazing and part lucky, but let's face it crawford was calling soft fouls when players were closing the gap on him and some of those shots over players heads that were contested went in the basket, he had a great night. He will not get almost 50 points every game this series, and when he only gets 30 or less someone else on dallas is gonna have to step up, and i can't see where that offense is going to come from on a consistent basis. Marion and Terry are 50% on good nights, terry can hurt from the 3 but more often then not he's gonna hurt his team if he keeps rushing shots. I honestly cannot see how everyone is dismissing one of the hottest 2nd half teams so easily, because they had a tough time with memphis, memphis had a pretty good second half too and so did denver. I wonder if fortunes would be reversed if OKC was the one who swept an overrated team and the mavs were the one that battled an underrated team for 7 games. ;-)
avatar

Posted by eliminat0r85
2 years ago

I'll take my steak now. ;-) lol
avatar

Posted by BrandenLang
2 years ago

Fair enough, I may just stay away. Although everything I've learned about Dirk tells me he's smart enough to know that if there's two men on him there's an open man somewhere out there. Also, half the reason (quite literally) he had 48 is because he was 24/24 at the stripe which shouldn't be happening if he's being doubled. I'll definitely think twice about it now tho, thanks SJP, keep up the quality work.
         1   2   3    next page    last page
You are currently not logged in.
Login | Signup | Help
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Top Response

Posted by DuckofDeath
2 years ago

"Wow, does Covers really pay you for this garbage?"