How to bet pro football

By COVERS.com STAFF | May 18, 2005 | 26 comments
send to a friend print version rss feeds AddThis Social Bookmark Button

There is little doubt that the NFL is where the sportsbooks see the most action and also make the most loot. The NFL possesses betting friendly attributes that are unlike any of the other major sports. First off, there are relatively few teams to keep track of in comparison to college football or college basketball. And second, these teams play only once a week which makes staying on top of the results much easier than it is in the daily leagues such as the NBA, NHL, and MLB.

These dynamics, along with the sheer excitement of watching and wagering on football, brings more square action to the table than any of the other sports. Almost every Tom, Dick and Harry in America is an NFL expert in their own mind and that is precisely what the oddsmakers prey upon.

Understanding who bets the games is just as important as understanding which teams are playing the games. The market at times will dictate price, which in the betting world means the oddsmakers cater to the public rather than reality.

Knowing the market inside and out is the basis of our NFL handicapping model. That is, our approach to NFL handicapping is of the contrarian or value seeking variety. We will at times place a higher premium on public sentiment than on the fundamentals. This strategy dictates playing dogs and/or lesser competent teams, or teams the public wants nothing to do with. Or better yet, fading the teams the oddsmakers want you to bet on.

Along these same lines, we carry a similar notion that the first week of the NFL season presents one of the ripest opportunities for the astute gambler. This conflicts with conventional wisdom and/or handicapping lore, as most would say it is better to watch a few games and assess each team before jumping in with both feet. That’s all fine and dandy, but there are some interesting trends to exploit in Week 1 and we’d be remiss to ignore them. Let us quickly explain.

Gone are the days of dynasties, where the same core players stay intact and dominate the league year after year. Free agency and player movements can completely transform teams from one season to the next. In today’s parity-driven NFL, poor teams typically don’t stay poor for all that long and excellent teams must constantly reinvent themselves to stay on top.

The temptation might be to assume prior year results are the best indicator of who is going to cover in Week 1. To Joe Public, playoff teams from the prior season, home teams, favorites, and so one, look even more enticing than usual since there is no current season performance to judge them against. But the question begs: are the oddsmakers setting a trap?

To find the answer, we culled five years worth of Week 1 NFL data. As always, all of our analysis is done from an ATS perspective. The purpose here is to share the most important angles we unearthed and try to explain the logic behind them. So strap on your helmet, throw on your shoulder pads, and follow our lead as we expose some rare holes in the oddsmakers’ line of defense.

Home vs. Away Teams

Over the past five seasons, NFL home teams in Week 1 are just 31-42-7 ATS (42 percent). This of course implies that roadies are a 58 percent winning proposition during this time. The public at large has a tendency to overvalue home teams and this is especially true in Week 1 when there is no current season data to make predictions from. Consequently, the oddsmakers almost surely shade the home teams, by and large making road teams the choice for the value player.

Conclusion: Look long and hard at road teams first when handicapping the opening week.

Price ranges

Favorites are just 31-42-7 ATS (42 percent) in the opening week over the past five NFL seasons (Coincidentally, home teams hold the same ATS record as noted above). This means that underdogs bark at a 58 percent clip. Mid-range favorites performed the worst among our specified price ranges. In particular, favorites priced between –3 1/2 and –6 1/2 are only 8-15 ATS (35 percent) during this time.

The same basic pattern holds true when looking at home favorites (road favorites gravitate towards a 50 percent mean). Home favorites indeed are just 21-32-3 ATS (40 percent) in the first week of NFL action since 1999. Again, mid-range favorites are similarly the poorest performers when we look at home teams. Consider that home teams priced between –3 1/2 and –6 1/2 have stumbled to a 6-13 ATS (32 percent) mark in Week 1 games the past five seasons.

Conclusion: Like home teams, favorites and particularly mid-range favorites are generally overvalued in Week 1.

Playoff teams

It might surprise you to learn that playoff teams from the prior year versus non-playoff teams from the prior year are a mere 16-23-3 (41 percent) ATS in NFL Week 1 games over the past five seasons. Home teams which made the playoffs versus teams which did not make the playoffs from the prior season drop to a meager 7-14-1 ATS (33 percent) during this time.

Why are playoff teams, and in particular those at home, such bad bets the past five openers? Just as the case with home teams and with favorites, oddsmakers intentionally overprice playoff teams in the opening week to compensate for the public’s propensity to over bet them.

This theory holds true just looking at straight-up records from the past season as well. That is, home teams with winning records from the prior season vs. road teams with losing records from the prior season are just 8-13 ATS in Week 1 NFL games since 1999.

Conclusion: Playoff teams from the prior year and in particular, home playoff teams, are overvalued in Week 1 NFL games.

Scoring defense and scoring offense

Do good defenses and for that matter good offenses from the prior season fare better against the number the following year in Week 1 games? Well, sort of. Generally speaking, teams with a solid offense or defense from the prior season tend to do well in the opening week so long as they are on the road. As a host, however, the best offenses and best defenses from the prior year tend to be overvalued in Week 1.

Consider that the top five scoring defenses (i.e. points allowed) from the prior season are a nice 8-4 ATS (66 percent) on the road in NFL openers the past five seasons. Meanwhile, the top five scoring defenses from the prior season are just 3-8-2 ATS (27 percent) as a host in Week 1 during the same time period.

There is no discernable advantage or disadvantage for teams with a top five scoring offense (i.e. points scored) in Week 1 games. However, when we look at scoring offenses from the bottom up (isolating the five worst offenses from the prior season), the results are rather interesting. In particular, teams ranked in the bottom five in scoring offense from the prior season are 9-4-1 ATS (69 percent) when on the road in Week 1.

The logic is simply that the public perception is a poor scoring offensive unit from the year prior will have little chance of winning on the road in Week 1. In turn, the oddsmakers compensate for this perception and these poor offensive teams from the year prior carry extra line value on the Week 1 trail.

Conclusion: Teams with top-ranked defenses from the previous season are good bets when playing on the road, but poor bets when playing at home. Also, teams ranked among the bottom five in scoring offense from the prior season are generally a good value in their Week 1 openers, provided they are playing on the road.

Scoring margin

An exceedingly straightforward way of measuring scoring offense and scoring defense together as a whole is to look at a team's “margin." Margin is simply scoring offense minus scoring defense, which is a fairly clear-cut measure of how a team does on both sides of the ball. Typically, the higher the margin, the better the team.

In this regard, it might seem counterintuitive that teams carrying the higher margin from the prior season in week one matchups are merely 31-42-7 ATS (42 percent). Furthermore, road teams with the higher margin are 14-20-6 ATS (41 percent), while home teams with the higher margin are 17-22-1 ATS (44 percent). Once again, these results line up with the theory that better teams from the prior year are overvalued come opening day of the following season.

Conclusion: “Better” teams, which often boast a higher margin than their opponent, are overvalued the following season in NFL openers.

In sum

Oddsmakers cater NFL lines to match public perception and also to bait the public into poor bets. The temptation to use the prior year’s success as a buy sign for how a team will perform against the spread in Week 1 of the following season is an enormous trap.

The fact is, isolating road teams, road dogs, non-playoff teams vs. playoff teams, teams with a losing record or low margin vs. playoff teams or ones with a high margin from the previous year is where the line value resides. Quite simply, taking the road less traveled is your surest path to NFL profits.

 

26 comments
comment Post A Comment
Rob420
Rob420 says:
07/17/07 06:04PM

Actually I watched the Raiders in the preseason and saw how pathetic their 1st team offense was and absolutely hammered whoever they played against which worked until they beat Arizona. I knew from that point they were a max 4 win team. I never looked at preseason before that but take a look at teams with different offensive players and/or different scheme.

atlheatholder
atlheatholder says:
07/19/07 06:53PM

Preseason games are like nba all star games - they're meaningless, just like Hawk said...

ShadowWarrior
ShadowWarrior says:
07/20/07 05:14AM

Watch out how Randy Moss meshes in with NE, and if Laurence Maroney can have another monster year, look out!!!

mikegauton
mikegauton says:
07/23/07 06:25AM

If anyone can tame the Moss its Bill Belichick I dont think he will be the complete focus of the team however he does open up a great outlet for Tom Brady to blast down to the endzone with 3 minutes left in the 4th and we all know recently the Pats dont destroy teams like years gone by but tend to get the job done. I would look to see how Bill Belichick utilises Randy and indeed controls him, no doubt he is a potent force but he is only going to be a cog in the machine that is the Pats and indeed the game plan that is Bill Belichick and staff. They have lost major coaches over the years but they still seem to get the job done I have been a Bears fan for nearly 20 years living in England but wow in recent years you have to say the Pats are a MACHINNNNNNNNEEE..........

SeanH529
SeanH529 says:
07/24/07 02:11PM

Great read, but I don't see any team that meets this criteria for the first week. Your top 10 D's last year were Baltimore, Jacksonville, Oakland, Miami, Chicago, New England, Carolina, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, San Diego.

Take out Balt, Chicago, N.E., San Diego because they were all in the playoffs. Out of the Teams left the only ones with AWAY games week 1 are Miami, Carolina and Pitt. None of them are playing playoff teams. So its back to the drawing board for me!

CKlejdys
CKlejdys says:
07/25/07 01:07PM

Sean,

Look closer. You have a top ten defense on the road in the first week at SD catching 6 points against an '06 playoff team at home. The Bears would be an interesting play.

angelobruno
angelobruno says:
07/25/07 09:08PM

bears aint gonna do garbage this year

professorkopak
professorkopak says:
07/26/07 09:37AM

THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY TO WIN CONSISTENTLY IN SPORTS BETTING, OR AS I CALL IT SPORTS INVESTING. YOU MUST KNOW CAUSE AND EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS. FOR THE MOST PART THIS FALLS UNDER TREND BETTING. BOOK MAKERS WILL ADD 1/2 TO 2 POINTS ON PUBLIC TEAMS BUT THAT IS NOT ENOUGH TO ACCOUNT FOR THE OPENING GAME DIFFERENCE. I WILL BET THAT IN THE NEXT 5 YEARS THIS WILL NOT WORK AS WELL OR NOT AT ALL. CAUSE AND EFFECT BETTORS LOOK FOR UNIVERSAL PRINCIPALS THAT ALWAYS WORK. WHEN FOUND THEY WILL ALWAYS WIN IN THE LONG TERM. TO ASSUME THIS WILL WORK LONG TERM IS NOT PRACTICAL. STILL A VERY GOOD ARTICLE

Hoopsbookie
Hoopsbookie says:
07/26/07 10:33AM

Sad but true article. Years ago (80's) I was one of the ( WALKER GROUP) Glenn Walker if you guys recall. I moved 20 - 30 dimes daily all over town. Now you might get a $500 total bet down. Anyway, I go out west anymore to just hangout with friends splash a few bets for fun. I tried to bet a $500 HQ (House Quenella) on the ponies and had 5 suites and people running around like I wanted to play 200 dimes. It was denied. Good Luck All !

pb8362
pb8362 says:
09/03/07 02:35PM

go bears

pb8362
pb8362 says:
09/03/07 02:48PM

t ake the 14 point teaser add to the over on hawaii,oregon ducks,marshall,boise state u,you wont make even money but u will win every week

larks888
larks888 says:
09/06/07 02:42PM

What about TB?

paymenowboys
paymenowboys says:
09/06/07 04:44PM

I like Houston a ton this week.

pb8362
pb8362 says:
09/09/07 12:01PM

14 point teaser on the over for stl,packers,bears,kc,redskins,easy money !1000 to get 833.33

pb8362
pb8362 says:
09/09/07 05:14PM

f them 14 points kc gb

pb8362
pb8362 says:
09/09/07 08:25PM

and the bears

VinVegas
VinVegas says:
11/11/07 02:14AM

THANKS FOR THE INFORMATION...THE TIMING WAS AWFUL THOUGH! WEEK 1 TIPS IN WEEK 10? AWWW...THANKS...I GUESS!

Wizerguy
Wizerguy says:
05/11/08 09:14AM

My strategy...why guess on the early weeks of the season no matter how good 58% looks. I like to wait until thanksgiving and on.By that time I have watched 3 months ofFB

Teams Home/Away profiles have been formed and I will seperate the home and away stats and by that point of time in the season you cant change the spots on a leopard which has given me a better than 68% during my tenure. Discipline to have the patience is a virtue.

Hipthickbrick
Hipthickbrick says:
10/14/08 03:18AM

If you have to continued to hold that "absolutely crushed" "defenseless" philosopy regarding those CLEVLAND BROWNS, you now can consider yourself the most broke behind dood anyone has seen in the past 3 years! They just finished "killing" the previously undefeated N.Y. GHiants on Monday night football! That defenseless # 15 team humilliated the Giants # 1 offense while allowing only 2 T D's, as they intercepted them at least 3 times! I am sure you aqre on board (I would be) that perferated sub as it plunges, downward, downward, deeper. That friggin mismatched # 32 Cleveland offense scoreed 35 points against New Yorks # 3 defernse! And they were favored by 9! I hope you were lucky enough to be out swpending your Dallas winnings rather that being devastated at these results!

heavygunner
heavygunner says:
10/16/08 03:30AM

jets and indy parlay

but the play of the week seems to be Wake Forest which I know has nothing to do with betting in the NFL but ill just throw it out there

WilliamCinco
WilliamCinco says:
10/17/08 07:55PM

Visit my Website :

www.WilsonPicks.com

and Send me an Em@il..........

Now my record in Overall picks NFL 2008-09 ,

is (61 %) , and (60%) in the last 3 NFL SEASONS.....

Including my (100% ) NFL POWER PLAYS Record.......

And my 20-6 ( 77% ) in the (Week 5) & (Week 6) together .......

Thank you very much ........

Add my Em@il to your email's safe list so delivery can be assured.

www.WilsonPicks.com

Good Luck........

William Cinco.

WinsNow999
WinsNow999 says:
10/22/08 12:16PM

Good reading article just found ...but I just curious about this ......

Who do you think are controlling the scoreboards of the games?

1. Key scores players

2. Coaches

3. Referees

4. All of us

5. Vegas

6. Groups of syndicated mafias.

7. Fans/Cheerleaders

Can you answer me this question please?

Kubrick
Kubrick says:
09/09/09 03:24PM

Tease Ravans, Miami, Steelers and Texans

TheBuddah
TheBuddah says:
09/11/09 11:41PM

When I was in college we called this the theory - meaning bookmakers had been around forever, that being the case the public must lose more often than win. Watch the spread and do the opposite of what most do. It worked like a charm in 85 86 and even part of 87. But then 1988 and 1989 - the public won everything - i lost my behind. Even my location commented - you like going against the public. Wayne Root in one of his books on sportsbetting commented 88' 89 were great years for the public. I still think it is good information to have when it comes to what the public is thinking;however, you need to look at data and come up with a formula that provides you with winners ATS. It's taken me quite a while to figure out what data works and then figure out a formula that allows for successful manipulation that results in winners. I look at 6 factors ORushing O passing DRushing Dpassing rankingss then Sagrin Ranking and Sagrin sched stregth ranking

Your results are going to either be 1 -5, 5-1, 3-3, 2-4, 4-2 0-6 or 6-0 for each scenario you have plays. For example, this weekend, using LYears data ( I recognize players have changed etc.;however, the data still results in winners); when you have a 5-1 or 1-5 situation historically that has been a spread winner - this week we have that situation with Baltimore playing the cheifs take Baltimore. What's interesting - when you have a sition where one team is better than the other team in all 6, it doesn't mean take the 6 team it suggest you tke the 0 team - vegas as overvalued the 6 team and the 0 team usually covers - this week the 6 team is NEngland - that means take Buff. Bottomline - seek public opinion but use data to ultimately make your decisions.

obriensimo
obriensimo says:
09/13/09 10:51AM

or you could look at the recent history of brady v buffalo- last two times they played n.e won out by over 30 pts both times.... i know a lot has changed but n.e look fully healthy while bufallo's main weapon lynch is out of the game... i'd take n.e

More Comments:  1 2  

Post A Comment

Add your response:

Click here to login.
Advertisement