NJ sports betting: US Attorney caught off guard by judge's question

If the major pro sports leagues and the Department of Justice have their way, bettors would no longer be able to place a recreational sports bet in the state of Nevada.

That was the argument made by Paul Clement, the lawyer representing the NFL and the leagues, in Third District Court in Philadelphia Wednesday.

Oral arguments were heard by a panel of judges as the state of New Jersey fought to overturn the decision from Feb. 28 that prevented legalized sports betting in the state.

Commandeering was a major issue during Wednesday's hearing, as was the constitutionality of the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992. The Third Circuit has never addressed the constitutionality of PASPA, which makes sports betting illegal but provides exception for four states.

The strangest moment of the proceedings appeared to come when Judge D. Nichael Fisher asked Paul Fishman, the attorney arguing for the Department of Justice, about March Madness pools.

For those wondering if Wednesday's arguments provided any hint as to what New Jersey's chances are:

To read a more complete overview of what happened Wednesday, we put together the best live Tweets from the proceedings here.

If you have any feedback or suggestions for our Editorial Team, please contact us at Editorial

            share   SHARE   rss   RSS FEED   email   EMAIL   print   PRINT
Hide All Responses
avatar

Posted by Thor4140
1 year ago

That was to Pauls bullshit comment
avatar

Posted by Thor4140
1 year ago

yep im sure the major leagues of sports all want betting stopped especially in Nevada. Keep on drinking the kool aid bud.
         1      
You are currently not logged in.
Login | Signup | Help
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Top Response

Posted by Thor4140
1 year ago

"yep im sure the major leagues of sports all want betting stopped especially in Nevada. Keep on drinking the kool aid bud. "