Robert Pattinson's Next Girlfriend
Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart didn't even last a year during their second go-around. And since R-Pat is back on the market, so are odds on his next gal pal.
Elizabeth Olsen (+1,000)
Olsen is the outright fave to steal Pattinson's heart but rumor has it the star of the upcoming Godzilla remake is in deep with boyfriend Boyd Holbrook.
Ashley Greene (+1,200)
Pattinson's Twilight co-star could be a nice rebound and would definitely make for one sexy vampire love triangle.
Amanda Seyfried (+1,200)
Seyfried would also make a nice rebound for Pattinson, especially after staring in the recent porno biopic Lovelace.
Katy Perry (+1,400)
This California girl already has a taste for British men, having married - and divorced - UK comedian Russell Brand.
Daisy Lowe (+1,600)
Lowe is a British model and a former Playboy pinup. After dealing with Stewart's brooding artsy-fartsy attitude, R-Pat could go for some simple eye candy.
Emma Watson (+1,800)
Looking for value? Aren't we all. Watson seems like a logical fit. She's an English actress who knows the pressures of starring in a popular book-to-film series.
Any Kardashian (+2,000)
Like we said last year when these odds were up, we like this play on the Kardashian clan. You get six for the price of one, even if Kim is carrying Kanye's bastard spawn.
Shailene Woodley (+2,500)
Woodley wasn't on last year's list of Pattinson's potential lady friends but the starlet of the upcoming Spider-Man flick is a less dangerous choice than Stewart.
Taylor Swift (+2,500)
Do not be fooled by her wholesome good looks and golden locks. You will end up the punchline in one of her songs. Run R-Pat run!
This seems like it would benefit both parties. Pattinson gets one of the hottest pop starlets on the planet and Rihanna doesn't have to wear a mouth guard on her dates anymore.
12/22/2014 4:47:00 PM
Santa's Little Helpers: NFL Christmas Cheerleaders
NFL cheerleading squads are getting into the holiday spirit and so are we. We showcase the hottest NFL cheer squads in their Xmas best - which is naughty and nice at the same time - as we head into the final week of the regular season. Happy Holidays!
9/25/2014 11:16:00 AM
Can bettors blame their losing wagers on these red-hot WAGs?
Green Bay Packers fans are blaming Aaron Rodgers' gal pal Olivia Munn for the Cheeseheads' slow start to the season. Here's a look at some other wives and girlfriends that may have busted your bets in recent years.
7/16/2014 12:36:00 PM
Derek Jeter: Ghosts of girlfriends past slideshow
Earlier this year, ESPN's SportsNation unveiled a great graphic of Derek Jeter's Dating Diamond, featuring some of the legend's amazing lineup of past girlfriends. Following the Captain's final All-Star appearance Tuesday evening, we thought we'd throw together a slide show featuring his exes. Respect indeed.
5/8/2014 11:43:00 AM
FHM Sexiest Woman In The World 2015 Prop Odds
FHM just named actress Jennifer Lawrence the "Sexiest Woman in the World" for 2014 and already the good folks at PaddyPower.com have odds out on 2015's SWIW field. We look at the odds on which beauty will beat them all next year.
There haven't been any comments posted on this article. Be the first to respond!
1* Free Play OVER Pens/Devils.OFF PERFECT SWEEP, AAA Sports *EN FUEGO!*AAA broke out the brooms on Thu, a PERFECT 3-0 +$3,230 sweep w/ 10* picks! He's now 13-6 +$6,410 L7 days ALL sports! 801-610 +$87,992 ALL sports s/ Jan. 19th, 2014! 67-46 +$15,090 NBA Y-T-D! 72-51 +$3,663 NHL Y-T-D! 24-22 +$1,162 NCAAB Y-T-D & 18-12 +$5,090 w/ 10* NCAAB TOPS!
How do you go about basing your Over/Under picks in the NHL (or in any sport for that matter?). Do you look for a team that’s currently red hot offensively and simply bet the OVER? Do you automatically assume a total will go UNDER the number because a team has done well defensively of late? Those of course are the most obvious factors to base a “totals” play on, and while “recent performance” does play a role in my selection process, it’s certainly not the only set of criteria that I use. Anyone that’s followed me for any lengthy of time knows that I am primarily a “situational” handicapper at heart, but that I don’t follow any one particular methodology religiously and that I believe remaining “flexible” at all times is the best way to approach a contest. Being a situtational handicapper allows you to take the “players” out of the equation a lot of the time, and for me that’s definitely the case for the most part, it rarely matters who is playing and who isn’t in my process (unless of course it’s a Top 5 player like LeBron James or Tom Brady etc). It’s not a big secret in that I base my Over/Under picks on “lop sided” trends and numbers and in this case, each team has played to the UNDER a few times coming into this one, switching the value to the higher number in my opinion. While the Pens opened the second half with a 5-3 win over Winnipeg, they’d then revert and fall 4-0 the following night to Washington; Pittsburgh has seen the total dip below the posted number in three of its last four. New Jersey came out of the break with a low-scoring 2-1 win over Toronto, after playing to three straight OVERs to end the first half. However take note that of the three games these teams have already played against each other this season, two of of them have dipped below the posted number, including in the last two straight. I’ll be the first to admit that the “Law Of Averages” is flawed in many ways, but I have always felt that “lopsided” numbers and trends have a way of naturally “correcting” themselves over the short, mid and long term. I think there are enough factors working in our favor here to pull the trigger on the OVER.
Copyright © 1995-