For bettors, the Blackhawks' streak beats the Heat's

If you’ve tuned into a popular sports talk show this week, chances are you’ve heard what has become the hottest debate in sports. And that argument is this: Which is more impressive – the Chicago Blackhawks’ 24-game point streak or the Miami Heat’s 16-game winning streak?

From a sports betting perspective, it’s not really up for dispute. We have a clear winner, measured by the only thing bettors use as a gauge - money.

If you bet $100 on the Blackhawks every night over their 24-game streak (in which they got at least one point in the standings for those out of the NHL loop), you’d be up a tidy $1,309.04.

Not too shabby, especially considering they lost three of those games in a shootout, which is also a loss at the sportsbook. 

The Heat, on the other hand, are 10-6 ATS (against the spread) during their impressive run. With 10 percent juice on each one of those bets (-110), a $100 wager on all 16 of those games would net you $509.10.

That means Blackhawks bettors won $799.94 more than Heat bettors during the two franchise-setting streaks.

Stay with me, now.

For those who are crying foul because we’re comparing the spread to moneyline, I disagree with that argument. I’m comparing the two most common ways that the majority of people bet the NHL and NBA - which is using the moneyline for NHL and the spread for the NBA. 

But just for comparison sake, if you’d bet $100 on the moneyline for all 16 Heat wins, you’d only be up $582.73. You’d have 16 wins at the sportsbook, but you’d only be up about $75 more than you’d make betting the spread. 

That’s still $726.27 less than if you bet the moneyline on all 24 Blackhawks games.

Again for argument sake, let’s compare Chicago’s puckline profit compared to Miami’s against the spread profit. This is the one area that Miami has its NHL counterpart beaten.

The Blackhawks are just 10-14 on the puckline this year (a 1.5 goal spread), which has translated to $86 in profit. For those who don’t know, there’s a profit with a losing record because Chicago has been the favorite in just about every game and the payout is usually big when a team is laying 1.5 goals.

It’s a bit of an apples and oranges comparison using the puckline versus the pointspread because the goals on the standard puckline never change, only the juice does.

Either way, these teams are winning a lot of cheese for smart bettors these days. You’d just have a bigger pile of it if you were betting the Blackhawks moneyline.

If you have any feedback or suggestions for our Editorial Team, please contact us at Editorial

            share   SHARE   rss   RSS FEED   email   EMAIL   print   PRINT
Hide All Responses
avatar

Posted by qster
1 year ago

This all depends on how you bet. I usually take the "wager" amount and NOT the "risk" amount when I make bets. So if you took the Black Hawks ML every game during this rediculous streak, you would be up at least +$2,400 compared to +1,600 (crazy juice in NBA, so spread is better...as games where the Heat barely beat the Kings, Cavs and Migic will cause you so pull some hairs). Hawks streak might end tonight with the home and home contest playing in Denver. Do the Avs have it in them tonight to put the dagger into this streak? For the record, this streak is tainted with SO wins. We all know Shootouts are like Poker...its more luck then skills. I still scratch my head at some of the line ups these head coaches put out for the shootout. I guess they get their 1 point and are happy with it.
         1      
You are currently not logged in.
Login | Signup | Help
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Top Response

Posted by qster
1 year ago

"This all depends on how you bet. I usually take the "wager" amount and NOT the "risk" amount when I make bets. So if you took the Black Hawks ML every game during this rediculous streak, you would be up at least +$2,400 compared to +1,600 (crazy ju..."