Wiz of Odds: The secret to big school success

Jay Christensen covered college football, among other sports, for the Los Angeles Times and produces the popular college football blog TheWizofOdds.com.

A bartender in Las Vegas once told me the worst thing that ever happened to him was winning $400 the first time he played blackjack.

“That was about $40,000 ago,” he said.

Yes, the gambling habit starts innocently enough. Maybe it was the weekly family card game, or just killing time on Friday nights shooting dice on the street corner with Rocco and the boys.

Call them gateway drugs. You crave the highs and become addicted to that feeling of instant satisfaction. But you want something bigger and better — something potentially more lucrative.

Then the opportunity arises to place your first sports wager, usually on a football game. It’s easy enough and, win or lose, you’re hooked and reading columns on Covers.

The ride includes plenty of lows, but that merely shapes strategy and develops a seasoned player, one who knows when to pick his or her spots and quite possibly, let a season’s worth of winnings ride on one game.

Finding those spots is becoming increasingly difficult in college football. This Saturday marks another low point in what has become the most predictable season in memory. Games of merit are a thing of the past, and today’s business model for big-time teams involves ducking opponents with regularity, even at this critical point in a season.

The spirit of competition has been sucked from the game. Want to win a championship? Learn the art of crafty nonconference scheduling.

The one component teams control is nonconference scheduling, and Florida, Alabama and Texas — the top teams in the Bowl Championship Series standings — have combined to play only two BCS teams in 12 nonleague games.

The mighty Gators opened as 43-point favorites Saturday against something called Florida International. I used to think this was an airport in South Florida until 2007 when this rag-tag bunch engaged in a brawl for the ages against the Miami Hurricanes.

An Internet search of famous alumni reveals C.D. Atkins and Louis G. MacDowell, the co-creators of frozen Orange Juice concentrate. One thing is certain: The Panthers are going to be beaten to a pulp Saturday.

Florida’s other nonconference opponents are Charleston Southern, a Division I-AA team, Troy and Florida State.

Another fact: Florida last played an out-of-state nonconference game on Sept. 21, 1991, when it lost at Syracuse, 38-21.

Alabama welcomes I-AA Chattanooga to Tuscaloosa Saturday. Its other nonconference games were Virginia Tech, North Texas and — you guessed it — punching bag Florida International!

Granted, Virginia Tech is a hard-knocking team, but why is a program of Alabama’s ilk playing Chattanooga at this point in the season?

Don’t give us that crap about the Southeastern Conference being so difficult that league teams are thereby granted a pass to engage in such nefarious scheduling practices.

Have you seen Vanderbilt play this season? It lost at Army. Kentucky can claim victories against Miami (Ohio), I-AA Eastern Kentucky and Louisiana Monroe. South Carolina, losers of four of five, is a pedestrian 6-5, and Tennessee is 5-5.

The SEC in 2009 is a three-team league when you include Louisiana State. That’s as deep as it goes. Mississippi? It managed to schedule two games against I-AA teams and has yet to beat a team of note.

Which brings us to the biggest offender in Texas. The Longhorns put together a cupcake lineup of Louisiana Monroe, Wyoming, Texas El Paso and Central Florida. Not a I-A opponent in the bunch.

Outside of beating 6-4 Oklahoma and 8-2 Oklahoma State, the Longhorns will advance to the BCS title game running through a schedule softer than Charmin.

It’s only the beginning, folks. BCS teams not only want to fill their nonconference schedules with inferior opponents, they also aim to gobble up all of the at-large bids to minor bowls beginning in 2010.

Big 12 commissioner Don Beebe has proposed legislation that would treat BCS teams with .500 records the same as teams with winning records from non-BCS leagues.

Currently, if a bowl has to go outside its conference affiliation to fill a spot, it can’t select a 6-6 BCS team over a team with seven or more victories. Beebe’s legislation would toss out that rule, meaning a seven-win team from the Mountain West, Western Athletic, Mid-American, Conference USA or Sun Belt could be bypassed for a 6-6 BCS team.

There are 120 teams in Division I-A, and 66 of those belong to the BCS. There are 34 bowl games this year and could be as many as 36 in 2010.

Florida, Alabama and Texas have perfected the art of nonleague scheduling. It’s the blueprint of success. Even if you’re a crummy BCS team, simply go 4-0 in nonconference play and 2-6 in league and you’re likely to be rewarded with a trip to a bowl game.

College football has serious problems. There is no incentive for BCS teams to play each other in nonconference play and Beebe’s legislation, which is expected to get the stamp of approval in January, only makes matters worse.

If you’re a bettor, it makes for more lousy games. If this keeps up, we’ll all be back on the street corner shooting dice with Rocco.

If you have any feedback or suggestions for our Editorial Team, please contact us at Editorial

            share   SHARE   rss   RSS FEED   email   EMAIL   print   PRINT
Hide All Responses
avatar

Posted by pelecap9
4 years ago

its all about the money. Basically when they make the schedules they ask these 1-AA teams do you want to get your A** handed to you and bring back $450k to your school. Of course there gonna say yes, these programs have small boosters and are dying for the money. Even raising tution costs isn't helping in this economy. Now honestly lets ask ourselves do you ever think in the BCS format the BIG TEN will schedule a SEC, vice-versa, nonconference game. No, it's just not economical and the sec and big ten directors hate eachother
avatar

Posted by TheCincyKid
4 years ago

And teams like Ohio State still get ragged because the Big Ten is "soft". At least they have the balls to schedule good non-conference teams (in week 2 i might add); scheduling home/aways vs Texas, USC, and over the next 8 years U of Miami, Oklahoma, and VA Tech....
avatar

Posted by libra55
4 years ago

Good article. Says it all about the so call power programs. $$$$$$
avatar

Posted by THE_EMPIRE
4 years ago

Hey Rocco it's been awhile since i've been back yup let's shoot some dice.....LMAO
avatar

Posted by THE_EMPIRE
4 years ago

Hey Rocco it's been awhile since i've been back yup let's shoot some dice.....LMAO
avatar

Posted by Godfather16
4 years ago

umm, the non-conf teams that Texas played ARE in the Div-1, they just all suck and they are in small conferences . Brilliant scheduling by Texas though. Many of the teams in the Big 12 aren't any better this year, and it will be a sham if Texas runs the table and gets in the title game. It will just give other BCS teams zero incentive to schedule anybody good, and you'll just see even more of this happen in the future....
avatar

Posted by GnarlesBarkley
4 years ago

I completely agree. TCU playing Clemson, Virginia, and Utah is more difficult than Alabama playing South Carolina, LSU, Ole Miss, Tennessee, Auburn, Kentucky, and eventually Florida. Boise State playing Oregon, and then practically no one, is more impressive than Florida playing 8 SEC games. Please dont hate on the SEC after they win 80 percent of their bowl games, and Florida or Alabama wins the BCS title....for the fourth year straight.
avatar

Posted by aspire210
4 years ago

yay, another article showing how much you hate the sec and big 12. how original.
         1      
You are currently not logged in.
Login | Signup | Help
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Top Response

Posted by aspire210
4 years ago

"yay, another article showing how much you hate the sec and big 12. how original."