Cleveland Browns: Not a good bet in 2008

By JACOB WHEATLEY-SCHALLER | August 8, 2008 | 5 comments
send to a friend print version rss feeds AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Check out more from Jacob Wheatley-Schaller at his sports betting blog, Vegas Watch.

The single most important aspect of sports wagering is gauging public perception, and comparing it to reality. If you find a team that's widely overrated, there's a good chance that there will be some value in betting against them. The easy part of this is figuring out the public perception; just watch ESPN, or listen to your buddies at work talk about their picks to win it all.

The more difficult part is figuring out the real truth. For MLB, we've found that Baseball Prospectus' PECOTA is the best measure of this; in the NFL, Pro Football Prospectus is very accurate. So, with the NFL season quickly approaching, I've been thinking about quantifying both "public perception" and "reality", and seeing how that plays out on the field.

Earlier this week, I did just that over at my blog, and ended up with some very interesting results.  Teams that were highly thought of by the preseason ESPN.com power rankings, but had low win projections in Pro Football Prospectus, did very poorly against the spread, especially in the first four weeks.  The opposite was true for teams about which PFP thought much more highly than ESPN. With that in mind, today I thought I’d take a look at one team that is getting more preseason love than they probably deserve.

Cleveland

 

ESPN.com Power Rankings: 10th in NFL

PFP Win Projection: 6.3 wins 

 

The Browns had a great year in 2007, with Derek Anderson leading them to a surprising 10-6 record.  The offseason additions of LT Joe Thomas (#3 overall) and LG Eric Steinbach (FA from Bengals) solidified the offensive line, which went from second worst in the league to third best, according to one of PFP’s metrics.  Unfortunately, Cleveland looks to be due for some regression, as they were blessed with great health last year.  Four of their five starting offensive lineman played all sixteen games, which is something unlikely to be repeated—in fact, Ryan Tucker broke his hip in May, and may not be available for the opener.  Offensive standouts Braylon Edwards and Kellen Winslow both struggled with injuries in ’05 and ’06, but were completely healthy in ’07.  Finally, Jamal Lewis had a great year last year, but the regression of the linemen (who were the main reason for his success last year), combined with his age and career workload, will likely cause his numbers to drop.  The additions of tackles Shaun Rogers and Corey Williams should lead to an improved defense, but a drop in offensive production will probably be the reason the Browns don’t live up to some lofty expectations.

5 comments
comment Post A Comment
CKlejdys
CKlejdys says:
08/09/08 09:25AM

VW, do you think the difficulty of the Browns schedule - having to play the NFC East and AFC South - would also lead to such a low win projection? Their intraconference games (against Buffalo and Denver) seem to be games they seemingly have a good chance to win.

Boomer
Boomer says:
08/09/08 11:33AM

I've been a loyal Browns fan for years, and while I agree that indeed the Browns are getting some wild acclaim, and perhaps are getting set up for a tough season, I'd say 6 wins is a bit of a "throw caution to the win" prediction.

1st of all, the Browns indeed had injuries last year: Winslow did struggle with injuries last year. And Seth McKinney got hurt on the O-Line, it's just that the Browns had outstanding depth as Ryan Tucker easily moved in to that spot. Jurevicious was hurt throughout the season as well. On defense, a smattering of injuries affected play as well. Does that mean good fortune on the defense side might add to the win total?

2ndly, the Browns added a nice WR in Donte Stallworth, and should really smoke the seams of visiting defense's. This will only help the production of Edwards, Winslow and the rest. Jamaal Lewis is also in great shape. Finally the Browns offense has to be taken seriously at this point, as OC Rob Chudzinksi, a Charger disciple, and hounded by many teams in the off-season to become a HEAD COACH.....a budding star, runs this offense. Derek Anderson is indeed in good hands, and who knows, maybe Brady Quinn would step in as well?

On defense, Shaun Rogers is a man-beast, and Corey Williams is way underrated. This team's D line just might be brutal, make no mistake about it. The real issue I believe is at the linebacking crew, believe it or not. They have veteran MCginnest, not the same guy as he used to be, Andre Davis, incosistent, and a host of youngsters. These guys need now to step up big time to show any improvement at all, especially DQ Jackson, and K. Wimbley. If these guys step up, the D will be much improved. The corner will remain a question mark until the season rolls.

Now, with the all the attention, the prime-time games, the expectations, it could be true it might be hard to fulfill the potential. In fact, the Browns might be improved, but the W-L might not all that change. But 6 wins? That's a tough pill to swallow, and at this point, the Browns faithful needs to stay committed, and look ahead to bigger things enjoy the upcoming season, and simply ignore the skeptics and naysayers at this point.

The Browns will be fun!

Profit01
Profit01 says:
08/09/08 04:40PM

This Jacob Wheatley guy seems like a tard to me. How do you not mention the pick up of Donte Stallworth? The offense got better their defense definatly got better. I think it is time to say the galss is half full not half empty in Cleveland. I am a Bengals fan and it pains me to say this but the Browns are for real. Many are looking at their schedule as a hindrence to them this year I see it as a positive because it forces them to be great every week. I think the browns not only make the playoffs but they win a very competitive divison aswell..

lvexpert41
lvexpert41 says:
08/09/08 09:52PM

WHO is Jacob Wheatley? He obviously knows nothing. It is an embarrassment to have an article this poor on the home page of covers.com. Please never let someone that knows nothing...like Jacob post again. Just keep putting Teddy Covers on the front page. He does a fantastic job. EVERYONE disregard this article. It is terrible. Browns and Steelers will battle it out for this division, just ask real experts.

Thank you.

micronot
micronot says:
08/11/08 06:19AM

Read closer, it says not a good "bet". Maybe its a bit subtle, but what the author is talking about is betting on the Browns. It is expected that they wont perform well Against The Spread. So if the spread is 3 and they win by only 1, then they don't cover ATS. Browns would still win the game, but those that bet on the Browns would loose because they didn't cover the spread. I am not sure how this equates to 6 wins though.

Post A Comment

Add your response:

Click here to login.
Advertisement