Umpires and totals: Men behind the mask occasionally steal the show

MLB’s official website tells you that umpire Ed Montague is a Navy vet, enjoys magic in his spare time and has a yellow lab named Mudge.

It doesn’t tell you that Montague has one of the smallest strike zones around, which almost always results in longer and higher scoring games than most of his colleagues allow.

Montague was behind the plate 51 times in 2005 and 2006. Thirty-seven of them (72.5 percent) played over the total. Those 51 games averaged 11.1 runs, well above the MLB norm.

Paying attention to the umpire schedule, once it’s released for a series, can prove fruitful for bettors under certain circumstances.

“Linesmakers don’t pay attention to (home plate umpire) when it comes to totals,” says Sportsmemo.com’s Rob Veno. “It doesn’t come into play with sides, but there are a couple of select guys around the league that I’ll look to play the total with when it’s their turn behind the plate.”

John Hirschbeck is the first umpire that comes to Veno’s mind, thanks to the deal Hirschbeck and his crew had in place – whoever called the slowest game behind the plate in a series bought dinner for the rest of them.

Fear of a hefty restaurant bill widened the strike zone and rendered the crew “an under machine”.

Hirschbeck has been behind the plate once in 2007, a 4-3 Milwaukee Brewers win over the Los Angeles Dodgers on April 3 that played under the total. Pitchers for both teams combined for 18 strikeouts and only five walks.

“Ed Montague’s another one I consider, though it’s not as knee-jerk a play because Hirschbeck’s under trend has lasted a longer time,” Veno adds.

Indeed, Montague seems to have undergone a dramatic change. In 2003-06, Montague’s games averaged 10.7 runs and were 70-43 over/under (O/U). In 1999-2002, however, Montague’s games averaged more than a full run less and were 59-75 O/U.

Veno suggests that Montague’s attitude change is likely the result of QuesTec, the mechanical eye that MLB started using to standardize the strike zone and grade its umpires’ balls and strikes calls. He noticed more than one umpire whose numbers changed once Big Brother started checking on them.

Umpires, however, aren’t the only people affected by QuesTec.

Certain pitchers made a living painting the black (and beyond), perhaps no one more so than New York Mets left-hander Tom Glavine.

“During his time with the Mets, Glavine has reinvented himself,” Chris Caraballo wrote on the Let’s Blog Mets website. “With the incorporation of (QuesTec) and the changed strike zone that focused more on north and south, Tom Glavine was no longer getting that outside corner that for years he made a living off of getting hitters to reach and hit weak groundballs to the shortstop and second baseman.”

Glavine faced the Philadelphia Phillies Thursday evening, who countered

If you have any feedback or suggestions for our Editorial Team, please contact us at Editorial

            share   SHARE   rss   RSS FEED   email   EMAIL   print   PRINT
Hide All Responses
avatar

Posted by Tritesy11
7 years ago

Unfortunately, they don't release the umpires for the first game of a series.
avatar

Posted by farmerjim43
7 years ago

How do you find out who the umpire is in the first game of a series?
avatar

Posted by sean2114
7 years ago

Roberts makes a good point you should always look at the umps before laying down a bet. As for this game I could easily see this one going way over.
avatar

Posted by scubby42
7 years ago

I think there should be an over/under for the fastest pitch thrown tonight. I would say it would be around 87 MPH.
avatar

Posted by BillyO
7 years ago

The line is NYM -142 O/U 8.5 - there seems to be a lot of other under trends for this game tonight.
avatar

Posted by FoShizzle
7 years ago

Montague was behind the plate 51 times in 2005 and 2006. Thirty-seven of them (72.5 percent) played over the total. Those 51 games averaged 11.1 runs, well above the MLB norm. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
avatar

Posted by ATStar
7 years ago

The umpire can play a huge role in the outcome of a game. This is easily one of my top 5 items I look at when laying down the cash on the diamond.
avatar

Posted by Pete_The_Killer
7 years ago

This article is written by someone who should take his own advice....... Glavine and these two umps are like night and day
avatar

Posted by snicker
7 years ago

Havent paid any attention to umpire stats in the past. Guess I should start. lol
         1      
You are currently not logged in.
Login | Signup | Help
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Top Response

Posted by sean2114
7 years ago

"Roberts makes a good point you should always look at the umps before laying down a bet. As for this game I could easily see this one going way over."