Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
CKP, are you doing this again this yr?
|
CKP22 | 1194 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by hardyvault: I have the utmost respect for Danrules24, but this system, all though good in the past, has not worked last NFL season or in the beginning of this one.... I hope it turns around Seriously !!!! After ONE Week .... |
Luckydan | 272 |
|
|
Thanks, GL
|
Luckydan | 272 |
|
|
San Diego wasn't a play ?
|
Luckydan | 272 |
|
|
So I assumed this past week was a loss ???
|
Luckydan | 26 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by gratefulbets: NFL...I've been tracking various net values since week #11, and then a few more since week #13. Here are the W-L ATS results, so far. Wk…..Value A & B…..Value C….Value D 11…….4-1 12…….6-0 13…….3-3……………..5-1…………5-3 14…….3-2………….….3-4………....6-3 15…….4-2……………..7-2…………6-2-1 16…….2-1……………..3-2…………6-2 17…….4-1……………..4-1…………5-2 18…….1-0……………..3-0…………2-0 (if KC picked as > +1.0) total…27-10………….25-10………30-12-1 (or: 29-12-2, or: 29-13-1) 19…..SF pk………….Ind +7.5……..Sea -8 19……………………..SD +9.5……..Ind +7.5 19……………………………………..SF pk 19……………………………………..SD +9.5 |
gratefulbets | 164 |
|
|
IMO it depends on how much money was bet on one team, not just the public or sharps ...
|
GTRandy | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Deano-: 2014 NFL PLAYOFF PREDICTIONS: This was a little tricky. Last years numbers and predictions didn't quite make sense. This year, it seems easier for us to make out the frauds and legit contenders. Although Denver has a league best yards over opponent, they are flat on turnover margin with the easiest schedule of all NFL teams. I have to say, think the NFL scheduling was thinking about Manning this year? Sorry Manning...not this year. Cincinnati is the only other team left with positive yards over opponent. They lead the AFC in defensive scores with 6 with a solid special teams. In the NFC Seattle appears to run away with an impressive 65.4 yards over opponent and +20 in turnover margin. Also helping is 5th in special teams and 4 defensive scores. Although saints lead in yardage, they lack the takeaway ratio to make them contenders. They are the ONLY NFL team with no defensive scores, and near last in special teams. Here are my predictions based on system: AFC FRAUDS: KC, IND, SD NFC FRAUDS: NO, GB AFC CHAMPIONSHIP: CINCINNATI vs DENVER NFC CHAMPIONSHIP: CAROLINA vs SEATTLE SUPER BOWL MATCHUP: Cincinnati vs Seattle (+1500) SUPER BOWL WINNER: Seattle (+260) Thanks for the updates Deano |
dawniewags | 103 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by cdubz34: Weather will play a factor in this game.... Going to be single digits or below with wind chill.... 100000 question is Kap in cold weather.... Anyone got any stats on that?!? Don't know what the exact stat is, but Kap played college in Nevada, and now SF, not cold weather teams |
insiders-edge | 104 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Deano-: I ran the numbers through Week 16 and here are the results. Note I only listed teams in the +yds because they are the only teams with a shot. I showed KC because their defense is leading in some defensive categories: Super Bowl 2014 === AFC === DENVER: Yards vs opponent average: +94.7yds Defensive Touchdowns: 3 SOS Ranking: 32/32 .430% Fumble Recovery's: 8 Interceptions: 17 Turnover +/-: (-1) CINCINNATI: Yards vs opponent average: +55.7yds Defensive Touchdowns: 5 SOS Ranking: 12/32 .508% Fumble Recovery's: 11 Interceptions: 17 Turnover +/-: (+2) NEW ENGLAND: Yards vs opponent average: +13yds Defensive Touchdowns: 3 SOS Ranking: 14/32 .508% Fumble Recovery's: 12 Interceptions: 17 Turnover +/-: (+10) KANSAS CITY: Yards vs opponent average: -27.6yds Defensive Touchdowns: 7 SOS Ranking: 28/32 .473% Fumble Recovery's: 15 Interceptions: 20 Turnover +/-: (+17) SAN DIEGO: Yards vs opponent average: +23.6 Defensive Touchdowns: 1 SOS Ranking: 31/32 .457% Fumble Recovery's: 6 Interceptions: 11 Turnover +/-: (-3) ==== NFC - (+35yd avg to qualify) ==== NEW ORLEANS: Yards vs opponent average: +88.2yds Defensive Touchdowns: 0 SOS Ranking: 3/32 .539% Fumble Recovery's: 7 Interceptions: 11 Turnover +/-: (-1) PHILADELPHIA: Yards vs opponent average: +28.2yds Defensive Touchdowns: 2 SOS Ranking: 20/32 .496% Fumble Recovery's: 11 Interceptions: 17 Turnover +/-: (+10) ARIZONA: Yards vs opponent average: +24yds Defensive Touchdowns: 5 SOS Ranking: 7/32 .520% Fumble Recovery's: 10 Interceptions: 20 Turnover +/-: (+1) SEATTLE: Yards vs opponent average: +17.1yds Defensive Touchdowns: 3 SOS Ranking: 11/32 .516% Fumble Recovery's: 11 Interceptions: 26 Turnover +/-: (+18) SAN FRANCISCO: Yards vs opponent average: +14.4yds Defensive Touchdowns: 5 SOS Ranking: 9/32 .520% Fumble Recovery's: 11 Interceptions: 17 Turnover +/-: (+10) CAROLINA: Yards vs opponent average: +17.5yds Defensive Touchdowns: 3 SOS Ranking: 1/32 .543 Fumble Recovery's: 10 Interceptions: 19 Turnover +/-: (+12) Do you have updated numbers ??? TIA |
dawniewags | 103 |
|
|
Thanks again gratefulbets ...
|
gratefulbets | 164 |
|
|
Here we go again with the haters .... Grateful, please keep doing what you're doing, really looking forward to your bowl thread....
|
gratefulbets | 341 |
|
|
replied to
Arkansas State got an invite from the GoDaddy Bowl over WKU and the reasons why are funny...
in College Football |
packers1992 | 8 |
|
|
After NIU disaster last bowl season, don't know if BCS still want them in their bowl games .... Just my 2 cents
|
lordzud | 44 |
|
|
|
thegamblino | 12 |
|
|
|
LeRinkRat | 82 |
|
|
|
louiegatbs | 71 |
|
|
replied to
103-68 system w/3 plays this week (Temple last week with this system)
in College Football |
thegamblino | 14 |
|
|
Thanks gratefulbets, can't wait for your bowl picks
|
gratefulbets | 341 |
|
|
Any plays for this week, thanks
|
neilsy25 | 307 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.