Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Good stuff MUD, I'm a Giants fan but I do actually like this spot for them tonight. Aside from the 9ers they have played hard and team well aware of Philly dominance in recent years. Getting Sheppard back vs decimated Eagles team I think a ML bet might be the way to go here at 2-1 odds. I took Giants +200 and DJ over 1.5 TD's +140 at SHouse.
|
Mud_Man | 7 |
|
|
Looking hard at #22 myself. Ford has swept the MIS Cup races each of the past two years. |
Johnnystheone | 10 |
|
|
Fair enough, but then why are you posting? I thought the purpose was to share insight and help each other out. Not just hope to post a winner and then brag about it later. Without your own analysis you could easily just be regurgitating plays from a million other places. |
Johnnystheone | 10 |
|
|
Much better. Not sure a driver with 0 wins can be "due" but I agree nice price for Reddick. |
Johnnystheone | 10 |
|
|
Guys, just posting WHO you are playing? Who cares? How about a small write-up as to WHY you are playing them? |
Johnnystheone | 10 |
|
|
Great insight |
goin4 | 4 |
|
|
I tried to pick Houston -4 for tonight's NFL game and got the following message.
Due to the consensus for this game, we cannot accept your pick What the heck is that? Just because one side is being picked more than the other I can't select that side? That's like a bookie afraid to take more action. I don't get it. |
pa_picks | 2 |
|
|
Gee has been terrible and the chance of a Mets sweep IMO is unlikely. I would take the home team here.
|
Covers | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ballerbooboo: Found a new local for me and my friends and been playing couple months and lost about 15k all together. Last couple week been winning 4k back and now he said the line is done until.footballl season. Basically I gave my local 11k and he shut down until football Wtf ...damn I feel like I got jacked.... . Dude, if you got paid for all wins you lost nothing that was owed to you! You are lucky the guy pays and will still be around for football. |
ballerbooboo | 26 |
|
|
I am getting tired of hearing the talk about home-ice not meaning very much. The Rangers were 27-12-2 at MSG in the regular season - the second-best mark in the Eastern Conference - and are 4-2-1 at home so far in the postseason. Also, I know Lundqvist is going to come into this game with laser-like focus. Holtby who has impressed the heck out of me might not. He and his fiancee welcomed Benjamin Hunter Holtby into the world on Thursday. Situations like that can go either way, they can be a motivating factor or a distraction. Given Holtby is a 22-year-old rookie, I lean to distraction. With the margin between these teams so thin, and Rangers HOME-ICE-ADVANTAGE combined with the unknown focus of the Caps net-minder, I beleive the Rangers get it done at the Garden and move on to face (and beat) the Devils. Rangers 3 Caps 2. |
Covers | 10 |
|
|
The Caps have suffered two backbreaking losses this series. I think the Rangers can smell blood and will match the intensity of the Caps in the 1st period and the entire game.
The Rangers are the more talented, more confident team right now and I think they close out the series tonight. |
Covers | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by reno1400: I like the under in this game... I would be careful because there is a chance the starters could get KO'ed from rain early. |
Covers | 4 |
|
|
When I go to the Tennis Wire page I gets dozens of stories and none
seem to be about tennis? https://www.covers.com/articles/sportswire.aspx?sid=TENNIS |
pa_picks | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Whalewatcher: Yeah he only beat an undefeated NE squad as the under dog in that Superbowl.....................
And in NE this year too! |
Covers | 78 |
|
|
Seems most people are leaning towards the Falcons because of the Giants
inconsistencies and injuries.
I understand that, but what I also understand is for whatever reason this team seem to always play up/down to their competition. Being the playoffs, I don't see that as a problem this afternoon And even though the Jets game was a 'road' game they have not had to travel since the win @ Dallas on 12/11/11. The Giants crowd was louder than I have ever heard them at snoopy stadium against the Cowboys last week and that should help vs. a Falcons team that is not as impressive on the road. I would try and find a line of Giants -2.5 since I think there will be a few floating around after all the TV EXPERTS pick the Falcs on the gameday shows. Giants -2.5 (Buy the hook if you have to) |
Covers | 78 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Lou: kapono/tinfoils, One of the main symptoms of this virus is that it often shows it's
own ads while on websites. And from some of the reports, it seems to do
that for some users when they are on Covers. What
we believe is happening is that the already-present virus sniffs the
ad-serving domains coming from certain ad networks (these are not hard
to figure out), and replaces those ads with it's own ads. In
other words, the virus is already present on the computer, but it only
becomes "active" when it senses certain ad-serving domains - at least
one of which we use. This activity triggers your AV/malware software to
toss up a warning. It would seem then that we have a very simple way of testing that theory. Just direct the users who are getting the virus hits to any other website that uses the same ad network(s) you are referring to and see if the same thing happens. |
kaponofor3 | 68 |
|
|
Clearly the value here is with the Rangers at around +130. I'm not sure any team in the NHL right now is a hot as the Rangers and they have owned the Flyers this year.
|
Covers | 2 |
|
|
I should clarify that using javascipt can be a vulnerability although after rereading your post you are probably talking about JAVA ( Oracle ) variation.
|
kaponofor3 | 68 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Lou: Europa, Specifically, read the part where it says: "Exploit:Java/CVE-2011-3544.E is a detection for a malicious Java applet stored within a Java Archive (.JAR) that attempts to exploit a vulnerability..." And now consider this... Covers.com's website contains no java whatsoever. None. Nada. We simply don't do java. Here is source code from your MY SCORES page (which I love BTW) that CLEARLY DOES USE JAVA. <script type="text/javascript" src="/ajax/common.ashx">script><script type="text/javascript" src="/ajax/SportsDirect.Controls.LiveScoresControls.CustomScoreboard,SportsDirect.Controls.LiveScoresControls.ashx">script><script type="text/javascript" src="/ajax/SportsDirect.Controls.LiveScoresControls.Scoreboard,SportsDirect.Controls.LiveScoresControls.ashx">script><script type="text/javascript" src="/ajax/SportsDirect.Controls.LiveScoresControls.BetGraph,SportsDirect.Controls.LiveScoresControls.ashx">script><script type="text/javascript" src="/ajax/SportsDirect.Controls.LiveScoresControls.BetStatus,SportsDirect.Controls.LiveScoresControls.ashx">script> <script type="text/javascript"> //> script> |
kaponofor3 | 68 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Lou: The IT team is naturally looking into this. they have been for a month. They haven't found anything, because there is nothing tto find. And those "crappy" ads you see running on our site???? Those are delivered by the virus, not Covers. If you are seeing those ads, it's because you already have the virus. Right now, we are only running ads from Google. Pretty good ones too. Clearly this NOT TRUE! This is part of the SOURCE CODE from Covers that is loading on THIS PAGE to which I am replying. <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"> ord=Math.random()*10000000000000000; document.write('It is never good policy to spread false information to your customers!!!! |
kaponofor3 | 68 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.