Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Col St. to keep pace and cover. Wyoming take-th and give-th.
|
Covers | 9 |
|
|
UCLA struggles with physical teams. beware
|
Covers | 16 |
|
|
FLA wins this by 2 scores without franklin. They don't allow any team points anyway, but this one is a 23-10 score with franklin out
|
Covers | 19 |
|
|
This game is a statement for USC. Don't use GA game as reference as GA has struggled recently against weak teams. USC to win by 2 scores+
|
Covers | 18 |
|
|
Like Lou here and under, UCF is a decent squad but Lou defense keeps UCF in check and LOU is is potent.
|
Covers | 103 |
|
|
Bad weather, Cains over performing at home, Mia QB beaten up. Sounds like a 20-17 slog fest to me.
UNC is always up for this game, and Mia scoring has been special teams and defense takeaways. I like Mia to win but in a one score game. |
Covers | 63 |
|
|
First team Lou has played that has a real program. It's easy to destroy mighty mights...
|
Covers | 81 |
|
|
Isolated on Friday alone, what a compelling game to watch.
Not sure how one can reasonably handicap this game with the inconsistent play on both sides. Cincy talent wise and home field advantage is the paper pick. I think I'll just stay late at the office and work instead. |
Covers | 55 |
|
|
Zona's only loss was at Wash by 18. Their defense has been stout all year. This looks to be a FG game. Not sure a motivated USC team can pull away.
Zona and the under for me. |
Covers | 22 |
|
|
Rutgers took their foot off the gas and setup their defense poorly as a result. There is no way that game should have turned out that way. The first 40 minutes of that game where Rutgers played showed me they are the play.
LOU hasn't played anyone yet and will have to adjust to the speed of a real team. Lou likely wins by 1 score. |
Covers | 81 |
|
|
The value is on NV on this one with the spread. NV can score enough to win or keep it to a one score loss.
|
Covers | 17 |
|
|
I see value in Stanford here, but OK State could win the game. 66-63 either way is what I see tomorrow.
|
Covers | 38 |
|
|
I look to what Ore did against another powerful physical team; Stanford. They showed they were physical enough to blow them out.
I like Ore here. First time I've ever been on Ore in a bowl game too. |
Covers | 35 |
|
|
Utah St has 4th quarter losses at Aub, at home against Col St, at BYU, and at San Jose St. They have the talent to stay with any team. Short trip for Utah St too to Potato Bowl, this is a big mismatch in my opinion against a MAC team.
|
Covers | 34 |
|
|
Common opponent of bowling green on the road. Wyoming won, Temple lost. Wyoming won at SD ST with a stud RB. Temple no notable wins on the road. I have to pick Wyoming here, especially in NM. The game isn't in Philly.
|
Covers | 29 |
|
|
Common opponent of bowling green on the road. Wyoming won, Temple lost. Wyoming won at SD ST with a stud RB. Temple no notable wins on the road. I have to pick Wyoming here, especially in NM. The game isn't in Philly.
|
Covers | 29 |
|
|
this screams 56-35 Clemson all day to me.
|
Covers | 12 |
|
|
Rice is a pretty foul team on the road and 1-3 against the spread on the road. This is going to be a cold game and Nwestern is looking at becoming bowl eligible. Nwestern is the play here.
|
Covers | 14 |
|
|
Unless you are a Bama, LSU, or OU there is a huge difference from being a home team to being a road team. Air Force IMO is a better team than SD St. Playing 4000 feet in elevation higher than they normally do will also be a huge factor. I'm not sure how SD St can keep this close in the 2nd half.
|
Covers | 46 |
|
|
The send-out gave Pitt a lot of credit at home, especially after their 3 point loss to ND.
The thing is ND had several TO's in the red zone that skewed the score. Sou Fla should have no problem cruising in this match-up, expect the line to move to -4 by kickoff, get this one in early. |
Covers | 193 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.