Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRAIN69 | 48 |
|
|
|
TRAIN69 | 67 |
|
|
|
TRAIN69 | 45 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by matty441204: Did you actually read the thread??? No, I read your first post, in which you clearly state: Quote Originally Posted by matty441204: So I do a 4-team ML parlay putting down $2250 Payoff is $4943.51 Now, I drop $4900 on an 8 team ML parlay including the above 4 games So, again, how are you planning to bet on an 8-team parlay containing the previous 4 teams with the winnings from that 4-team parlay?
|
matty441204 | 115 |
|
|
How do you expect to win $4943.51 on the first 4-team parlay, and then use the winnings from that parlay to bet on an 8-team parlay that contains 4 of the same teams on the previous parlay? I don't know a sportsbook that would let you bet on games that are already finished
|
matty441204 | 115 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by johnnybunique: Werent the Giants DD chalk against Seattle earlier this year? I think it was -13 and they killed them, easily covering...
Yes they were, but they were actually only 10/10.5-point favorites, and BTW the only reason they covered was a lucky late sack in the end-zone giving them 2-points to cover, otherwise they would've only won by 9. So no, they weren't "easily covering". |
BigUnit | 66 |
|
|
replied to
11/16 NFL - 1 PM Shocker! Ravens ML +270 *****Ravens @ Giants IN-GAME*****
in NFL Betting
+276 at Pinnacle
|
HappyKane | 37 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by talent888: See, this is where you have to look at the past games. Denver scores a lot, which means teams have to pass A LOT. Teams playing Cleveland are always winning, which means running a lot and not passing. Which, is why Cleveland's pass D is not a good indication of how they are. When teams need to pass on them, they can, and easily. Hell, look what Flacco and the ravens did on Cleveland last week. Just something to think about Hmmmmmmm..... Yes, I know this, but Denver is going to be doing a lot of passing tonight, and Cutler is not himself...how are they going to run well when they have 4 RB's on the injury report. Denver cannot pass well ATM, looking at past games (like you said) they lost to Miami, Jax, KC and I wonder why...because Cutler CANNOT throw the ball |
sgtmike | 11 |
|
|
Cleveland is 13th in passing defense, and with Cutler having problems, I don't see him scoring 3 TD's...In fact I see Quinn scoring 2-3 TD's with Denver's lowly 27th passing defense
|
sgtmike | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Bird4332: THURS FINAL CARD
CHA/CLE U 184 (1U)
DAL -5 (1U) HOU/DAL O 190 (1U) NO/PHX U 198 (1U)
I think this might be the best line i can get on this NO/PHX total. I expect it to drop right before tip to get more of the public to pound on it! I smell a sweet reverse line movement tonight! Anyways BOL to all tonight! My book, the total went from 198.5 up to 200 now...?? Oh well, I'm still taking the under.. |
Bird4332 | 39 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Slingzz: Not wasting anytime here.......
Pittsburgh -2.5 NY Giants.
I think Willie Parker is back here, if not Moore has been running decent enough.
I dont like The Giants to establish any run game here.
I think the Steeler fans will be too much for Eli.
Giants had trouble with both Cinnci and Cleveland and now they play the class of the division.
Giants have had the luxury of playing 3 of their last 4 games at home and 4 of their first 6 as well.
This is a possible look ahead for NY...They have Dallas next and then Philly on deck.
Pittsburgh is the #1 Defense in the league and we're laying less than a FG @ home.
This aint my GOY but its my largest play of the year so far and i dont care if the public is on it or if theres some reverse line movement B.S., Steelers are the right play
Don't you think last week's game was a "look ahead" for the Giants, coming into this week, even though they lost to Cleveland. I don't think they'll be looking ahead, especially against Pitt, with Dallas' injuries. Also, isn't Tennessee the best D in the league? I thought they were... |
Slingzz | 71 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ThaDrizzle77: I love it. Buffalo Bulls shaftjob, then Houston, Skins and Tampa on the incredible jobbing.
Wussie, I know what you are thinking for Monday and we better drop this or drizzle has depleted his funds.
Texans and Bulls and Bucs..ohhhhhhhh F__K Worst day of my life. WTF are you talking about? The Buffalo BILLS won by 9... |
WussieMan | 55 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bigirondawg: 21.5 is a play, 22.5 is not. B-Runo, the reason it's not a play is b/c it makes the middle 9, not 10. Wouldn't Under 22.5 be better than Under 21.5 lol...I didn't get that play in anyways... |
NJPorky | 212 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by MP-32: Oct 14 12:28am 5 Team Parlay - Pending 50.00 to win 683.33 1.
Football - Tennessee Titans - spread -5 (-210) 2.
Football - Miami Dolphins - spread -3 (+100) 3.
Football - Chicago Bears - spread -3 (-125) 4.
Football - Houston Texans - spread -5 (-210) 5.
Football - New York Jets - spread -3 (-115) Jets and/or Bears are most likely going to fuck up that parlay. |
YoungOne | 66 |
|
|
Nice, I will check it out next weekend also
|
usakangy | 8 |
|
|
Yeah, that is definitely big movement, might make a small play on it at +6.5 it doesn't go back up to 7.
|
lpforsythe8 | 14 |
|
|
L. Sendlein +5(-110)
N. Hardwick -5(-110) |
WussieMan | 86 |
|
|
~69% of bettors on N.O. and line moved to +6.5 on my book from +7.5. Any reasons why you think this may have happened? Oakland win or cover?
|
lpforsythe8 | 14 |
|
|
Neb/Texas Tech Halftime coming up
|
UGAPIMPIN | 99 |
|
|
I think the play is Utah -7.5 as it should be Wyoming +31 (correct me if I am wrong)
|
UGAPIMPIN | 105 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.