Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by EazyFBaby: Why does black history month exist? Because us having all 12 wouldn't be fair
|
dendogg55 | 90 |
|
|
Maybe i'm missing something but how is a team that's dropped 6 straight favored by 9 against an equal opponent?
|
jalayn2 | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TheCrow: ladies and gentlemen this is a very bad matchup for condit. GSP would have also been a very bad matchup for diaz also Is GSP a good matchup for anybody?
|
TheCrow | 10 |
|
|
Are 26-7 (79%) ATS over the last 7 days
|
jalayn2 | 3 |
|
|
No shot in hell
|
lakersfan20009 | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by misfits: hey dipshit nobody is talking about wanting people high on the job. its the same stupid ass question as do you want your 911 dispatcher drunk when you have an emergency? or do you want your surgeon drunk when he is operating on you? how fucking stupid are you? Do you not think some of these people WOULD be high on the job if it were legal?
|
jwub91781 | 60 |
|
|
Would you want your 911 dispatcher to be high when your in an emergency and need help? Or how about a surgeon when your being operated on?
|
jwub91781 | 60 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by oddsbuster: I'm guessing you didn't watch the game... Nope, sure didn't How exactly did BYU get beat by double digits when they could "wipe the floor" with SM on a neutral court?
|
oddsbuster | 49 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by oddsbuster: St. Mary's doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence, sorry. BYU would wipe the floor with Mary's on a neutral court IMO... BYU lost to them by 16 just eleven days ago
|
oddsbuster | 49 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by oddsbuster: sportsanalyst... St. Mary's is a bit over valued in this spot IMO. Play your gut. I'm playing mine... Had the same gut feeling but decided to lay off. St. Mary's is 4-0 ATS at home & 5-0 ATS against teams above .500 Not to mention they lost to BYU on Saturday by 25 against the same spread. BOL though!
|
oddsbuster | 49 |
|
|
Has anyone been following their NCAAB picks this season? I tried to find their record but don't see it posted
Any input is appreciated!
|
jalayn2 | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by PULLA: Memories of seeing Anderson tap to Chonan and Takase, and getting DQ'd vs. Okami must have been fantasy. I'll give you the Takase sub. I don't consider knocking out Okami & getting caught in a miracle flying scissor heel hook when he dominated the whole fight losses. And that loss was 7 years ago, what he has done since then?
|
TheCrow | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by sirchadwick1: It's going to be funny when Sonnen actually catches Anderson in a sub this time around. Wonder what the line would be on that.... Saying an undefeated fighter will lose is even funnier
|
keven vanlith | 39 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TheCrow: hopefully people keep taking anderson and then press the line up to +250 by fight night at least Why wouldn't they, the man has never lost! While he was dominated in the first fight (and unhealthy), how can you be so certain Anderson will be beat when it's never happened? You've gotta think he will come in better prepared & revenge will be on his mind
|
TheCrow | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by akatdrake: anything under -300 is a gift for Spider backers... |
keven vanlith | 39 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by avalon: 1. open to the public Library?
|
avalon | 43 |
|
|
If that's your biggest concern your in for a rude awakening
|
STEELERS in 07 | 264 |
|
|
Is splitting up, WTF!
|
jalayn2 | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Suckitup: Go back 15 - 20 years and listen to some real rap / hip hop. Lil Wayne has no talent. Bingo!
|
PapaShango | 20 |
|
|
Crime would drop 800%
|
MakeSumCake | 28 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.