Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: This shows that our past leadership is either clueless or ignored what was extremely obvious to me before going into Iraq last time..it is a horrible idea to put religious groups into power in the Middle East. I'd like to hear how Mr. wallstreetcappers would advise President Obama to solve this problem then. |
Randisist | 134 |
|
|
The score is 3-1 at the end of the 2nd intermission. I don't know who is in charge of ensuring the score is correct for this game, but that person should be fired.
|
Covers | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Villemure30: ..and maybe I am misreading and you meant the Senator's dominated but again with those statistics, how could you say either team dominated You didn't watch the game, but the Pens had the eye test won whenever they weren't on the Power Play. Yeah, you read right. They looked like garbage on the power play, including giving up the equalizer. From my point of view (as a pens fan), Anderson is going to need another amazing game for Ottawa to keep winning
|
AC4LIFE | 5 |
|
|
On all three as well BOL |
RedFlagCapper | 20 |
|
|
Let us count the ways: Magic +6.5 - Up 57-48 at halftime - Allow Portland to get back into the game in the 3rd, and cover well. - Catch back up in the 4th, manage to force OT - Go down 9 in OT - 15 sec left, down 7 - Think to self, "They are going to lose this bet" - Gametracker updates: only lost by 6; lose but cover |
vasilli07 | 10 |
|
|
Dallas is muthaflippin' clutch!
|
Air1 | 258 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Air1:
#4: WEST ONLY 32-1 +23.74 Units. 3 game fade chase on result of the A game. Losers Filtered. System 4 is a little confusing for me. The win is off of Dallas' streak when they beat New York in the B-game, right? So should we be fading Sacramento, or is an A game Loss necessary to start fading? And what does "Filtered" mean? The only Streaks I have are New York (W, 1), Memphis (W, 1,8), Dallas (L, 2,4,5), LA Clips (W, None), and Sacramento (L, 2,4?,5,6). So where is the System 7 play? I've got quite a bit of a Spreadsheet made, just ironing out the wrinkles. |
Air1 | 258 |
|
|
^^^ All Systems mentioned in first page of the original thread ^^^ |
Air1 | 258 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SuperHappyTime:
Yea, C game for System #3. But I was under some odd impression System #2 could be used for both streaking winners and streaking losers, otherwise all it does is clash with System #1. I dunno, maybe I'm just making SHT up (ba-dum ching!) 11/24 plays: Sacramento System #2 play hit Dallas System #3 play missed, next/final play on Nov. 27 Next Plays: 10/26 Memphis - System #1 - Pick Against - Game 2 of 3 10/26 Memphis - System #2 - Pick For - Game 1 of 3 Streakers to Watch: Minnesota - 5 Losses - Next Game: 11/27 - Earliest Possible X Game: 11/28 3 game streaks: Cleveland, Denver, LA Clippers, Sacramento Teams with Earliest Possible X-Game: Minnesota (11/28), Denver (11/30), Cleveland Detroit and San Antonio (12/1) |
Air1 | 258 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by akell09:
I too am following the systems listed on the original post. I don't see where Sac. is a play tonight. (X) game 11/21 LA Lakers (win to stop losing streak) (A) game 11/23 Utah (win) (B) game tonight Utah Aren't we suppose to wait for the (C) game to start the chase? Yea, C game for System #3. But I was under some odd impression System #2 could be used for both streaking winners and streaking losers, otherwise all it does is clash with System #1. I dunno, maybe I'm just making SHT up (ba-dum ching!) |
Air1 | 258 |
|
|
I got picking both Sacramento and Dallas to win for tonight, picking both for and against Memphis on the 26th, for Saramento and for Dallas on the 27th (regardless of what happens above), and for Sacramento on the 30th. I'll be honest, I don't know what the systems are anymore, I'm mostly basing these picks off the first post in the other thread. I'd be willing to make up a spreadsheet with everything on it, but I'm gonna need Air1 to spell them out for me in a single post |
Air1 | 258 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Air1:
Welcome back stickbit. Nice to have you abroad SuperHappyTime (wanted to use the acronym SHT, but people might misread it.) Feel free to use the acronym anytime I make a bad post (like above) or a bad pick. I'm not use to a site that doesn't allow post edits in the forums, although I completely understand why it's done here. Quote Originally Posted by Air1:
Here is where things get a little weird we are currently on the B game of the chase fading the NYK. However! at the same time another system is to play them! so on 11/20 I am playing to win 2.1 units on NO and 1 unit on NYK. Yea, this seems a little weird, but couldn't there be a system here? Systems 1 and 2 will conflict for winning streak teams on Game B if there's a win for Game A. So what about a chase starting with Game C hoping for the opposite result of Game B? I don't have access to a database (or know how to use one), but I'm pretty certain might be a bad system. On the System 1 continuation it probably has a 50-50 or so chance of winning if it makes it to Game C, and there's little connection to hitting on Games D & E (Otherwise, System 1 would be worth going to more than 3 games). System 2 on the other hand points to good fortune, since it's nearly undefeated, but again, it could strike well on the first game more often than the last. I am pretty much theorycrafting that we should double down on System 2 if Game B is a NOLA ATS win, but I have no data to back it up |
Air1 | 258 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by stickbit:
GL this season Air. Can you help explain these records? For ex System #2 is 75-11 for +37.5 units? How so? I know I am missing something obvious here but help me out if you can. thanks!
Each System involves a series of plays |
Air1 | 258 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.