Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
replied to
There are winners in life and there are losers in life. This team is a loser in life. DET@DAL
in NFL Betting
I feel sorry for people like this. Think about how lonely this guy must be to come on Covers, waste all this time, write all this nonsense and still lose constantly. It's sad. It really makes me grateful for the things I have in life like family and a career. Hang in there buddy. Hopefully one day you'll have more in your life than just coming on a gambling message board and looking to see how many people read your meaningless post.
|
scalabrine | 205 |
|
|
His name is Dez Bryant. Anyone who is over the age of 11 or has ever watched an NFL game would know that.
|
stockboy | 40 |
|
|
I don't think Aikman is bias at all and I'm a Giants fan. I actually think he may go overboard to be hard on Dallas. If you think he's bad at his job, that's another argument but I never thought he had a Cowboys bias even during Giants games. I find that he points out a lot of things wrong with the team. Is he rooting for Dallas? Of course he is. That's just human nature but I don't really hear it come through.
|
johnny1349 | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by lancer89074: So then without Bell, the Pitts' offense is castrated? You may be right in your pick of Baltimore but not for that reason. Pitts will go 5 wide with short passes and frustrate the Baltimore front 7. Pitts is on a hot roll and their defense is playing better and better each week. I see Pitts shutting down the Baltimore run and then putting Flacco to sleep. All of this Baltimore love and based on what? They are limping to the finish line. Carolina could not beat Cleveland easily a few weeks ago at home with Manziel and gave up a 81 yard td pass from Hoyer and now they are the '95 Bears. I think your picks suck but bol. I think your comments suck. You should give your opinion less. |
CalBear | 70 |
|
|
replied to
Giants -3 over Jaguars. I don't care how square you think that pick is.There is good reason 2takeit.
in NFL Betting
Wow, this guy is on the right side a lot for someone who is 5-7. I bet he's never won a game by getting lucky either. He probably only has bad beats. That's how you know a true loser. When they only complain about bad beats and pretend they never got a lucky bounce. Real gamblers know that stuff all evens out. I mean, how can things go bad for the Giants? They're 3-9. Things never go bad for a 3-9 team.
|
scalabrine | 300 |
|
|
Let's use logical reasoning here. You posted 15 plays before adding your POY. Then you went 0-2 and all of a sudden a POY appeared. Are you saying you decided on 15 other plays before finding a $10,000 POY on this week's card? Nonsense. It doesn't matter. Jacksonville covers for fun. Good luck on your other 27 selections this week. I'm sure you're betting real money. Sounds realistic.
|
NFL-1975 | 28 |
|
|
replied to
When the going gets tough, the tough gets going. The Jets aren't the only team I'm on this week.
in NFL Betting
You'll listen if Dallas beats the Giants? Yeah, that's an impressive win. By the way, they already pounded them once. Dallas also won in Seattle. That's the the same place where the Seahawks rushed for 400 yards against NY. Two points. First, the Giants rank last in the NFL at stopping the run. Dallas' offensive line is going to maul them. The Cowboys ran for 156 yards and 4.5 YPC in the first game. You mentioned the cold weather. Dallas is the team built to succeed in the cold weather, not the Giants.
Second, being one of the best receivers in the history of the Giants isn't saying much. Who holds that honor now? Mark Ingram? Stephen Baker? I think we assume Beckham will see a lot of action. He starts and is the team's No. 1 receiver. Good luck but this sounds like a homer pick. |
scalabrine | 122 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by QBoption: Train : u guys are attacking me not the other way around. hey bro, you said you want to help everyone? when was the last time u helped me, or anyone else. you just want to feed your own ego im not trolling, i am just defeneding myself. go ahead start your panel. im not trolling im the boise st. of this forum. When you have multiple screen names it's best if you stay logged into the same one when arguing in a thread. You started this thread as ibetbig2 and then signed in and posted as QBoption. Try to stick to one screen name in the future. It's less confusing. Thanks. |
Boom_Boom | 72 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by VegasVandal: where do you clowns come from. seriously? I remember my first bet too Was it a loser like Michigan State? |
DAVIDN | 78 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Jailbait7127: oh wow... the game finished already? Yup. Finished. Take your money and wave goodbye to it. Sorry bud. Not rooting for anyone to lose. Just stating what everyone watching the game knows. |
DAVIDN | 78 |
|
|
I had to lay off this one. The number barely moved and it looks like people knew something. Michigan State didn't show up for this one. Sometimes the obvious just doesn't add up for some reason.
|
DAVIDN | 78 |
|
|
This seems like a really strong play. Do you make anything of the line going the other way? Seems odd with Indiana's concern at QB? Even the local media is wondering what they're going to do. Plus, it's not like they have a defense to lean on. Great RB but tough to just run the ball on MSU. Wonder why line dropped to 13.5.
|
DAVIDN | 78 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DynastyOne: Utah is a popular play and i believe a lot of people have no idea how hard it is to win in the big house. I know our fan base isn't as "loud" as others but were 20-2 at home under Hoke. The perception is that were not good because of the behind whooping we took by ND... Well 2 of our DBs were out, turnovers happened and gholston played heck of a game. The stats doesn't lie, We out gained Notre Dame in total yards. I've said in a post at the start of the season that our defense has improved and we would be seeing a lot of Unders on Michigan games this year. The rush defense has been stellar so far even though 2 of the 3 opponents are below average teams. Our front 4 hasn't been able to get to the QB much this year but they've been solid up front. Notre Dame manage to only run 54 yards on us? ND exposed our secondary with no Peppers and Taylor...Arguably our best two man coverage DBs. Nussmeier has been focusing on the run game and I believe well see a lot of conservative play calling this week. We have a young O-Line that's still a work in progress so I expect a lot of runs, bubble screens and swing passes. I'm not sure if Gardner will have a good or bad game as he's been inconsistent for most of his time at UofM. Again, he's been pressured majority of the time because of a young offensive line. Our OC has been trying to make it simple for him with a lot of quick passes and screens. We don't have a speedy "heavy hitter" in the run or pass game. I won't be backing Michigan in this game but I believe they'lll win the ball game. Bias or not! Ill stick to what I'll know and play the Under 56 Hopefully 28-3.(no fgs bc our kicking game sucks, ha) Best of luck. This comment is ridicolous. Stats don't lie? Let's see, why would Michigan outgain Notre Dame? Maybe because the Irish defense dominated, created 4 turnovers and only had to go 20 yards to score? That was as one-sided a game as you will see. Trying to say it any other way makes me think you know nothing about Michigan football other than picking a picture to use as an avatar. And the reason people perceive you're weak is because of the buffoon that's on the sideline and the fact Michigan hasn't won a Big 10 title in 10 years. Well, make that 11 years. Good luck. |
DynastyOne | 30 |
|
|
replied to
I've been saying 9ers for a few days now but that line is not budging off 3.5
in NFL Betting
Last week the public money was on the 49ers and people on Covers were pretending to be sharp getting so confused they didn't know which way was up. At the end of the day the 49ers were the better team, dominated the second half and won 23-10. Nothing anyone said about dumb line moves and pretend sharps mattered as usual. The 49ers were just better.
|
cesimmns | 18 |
|
|
So what? A homer ESPN blogger writes a homer piece about the team he covers and you think that decides the outcome of the game? If you like Seattle bet Seattle but if you are using info from ESPN blogs you must be down a lot of money this year. This is garbage. For everything said in this article a SF writer could do a story interviewing people telling you why Seattle is in trouble on Sunday. I know one thing, they have lost two of their last five games. Go find all of the useless blogs you want but that's the only stat that matters. Their offense is obviously a problem considering they're 3-2 since it went in the tank. Now there, I just shot that entire MUST READ blog out of the water.
|
shooter15 | 22 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NeverMind: This bet is gonna make me feel a lot better knowing that there are plenty of SF backers going to the NFC Championship game. I was a little worried SEA would get heavy action. Right, because that makes a difference. How did that work out when everyone was on San Fran last week? 23-10. Great way to bet. Meaningless. |
MasonDixon | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NeverMind: bottom line, Seattle is going to win. Taking Seattle ML all day, along with Denver. Now we should take the Seattle and Denver money lines? What happened to your Saints vs Chargers Super Bowl? Bottom line: You don't have a clue. You just babble. |
MasonDixon | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner: Another example as to why it would be best to ignore this nonsense. Hey wait, you didn't use the words "sharps" and "steam" in your post. You must not know anything about gambling. These people on Covers are so confused as to who the real sharps are I swear sometimes they bet both sides of a game and hope for a tie. |
BigNiner | 40 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69: Lots of crazy talk around here (not unusual). Lots of people lovin these road teams (pretty unusual). SF is the only team that the weather wont effect. The spotlight will effect Cam (that and not having any help on O). Colts outta the dome, in a letdown spot and in the cold vs Brady/Belichek, after allowing Alex Smith and Andy Reid to put up almost a million yards Chargers already beat the Broncos in Denver. I cashed on the SD ML/Under parlay. Not gonna happen again. Saints outta the dome and now gotta play in horrible conditions vs the best defense in the league with the best home field advantage.
Seattle -8 Seattle/NO O44.5 NE -6.5 -120 NE/Colts U52.5 SF ML SF/Car O41 Denver -8.5 Denver/SD U55
All dogs dont go to heaven. Thats a kids movie. People have been talking about how the Saints can't play away from the dome all year long. Now all of a sudden everyone likes them to upset the toughest home team in the NFL in bad weather. No wonder why bookies are always smiling. |
TRAIN69 | 54 |
|
|
Right because the public has never won a game before. The Broncos and over has never cashed. Great gambling theory.
|
drozanski | 23 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.