Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Very impressive so far hope you keep it up, started tailing yesterday thanks for the picks
|
TheGriller66 | 47 |
|
|
Hitchin v Redditch
Darmstadt v Nurnberg Las palmas v Celta Vigo Over 2.5 goal treble Odds 4.91
|
MickSlick13 | 1 |
|
|
Koln have drawn 1 and lost 8 of their last 9 competitive games and since Modeste left and now their only other goal threat Córdoba got injured they have been completely toothless up front. Their is nothing to point to a Koln away win here in my humble opinion.
|
Maximus1978 | 6 |
|
|
I looked at this game and was actually very tempted to back Stuttgart -1.5 on the AH, clearly we have a complete opposite view on the game, why do you like Koln?
|
Maximus1978 | 6 |
|
|
Guangzhou Evergrande v Yanbian Fude
Over 2.5 Sonderjyske v Midtjylland Over 2.5 Bristol City v Burton Albion Home win Odds 2.96 Gl all
|
MickSlick13 | 1 |
|
|
Adding
Palmeiras v Bahia Under 2.5 Odds 1.95 |
MickSlick13 | 2 |
|
|
Botev Plovdiv v Septemvri Sofia
Home win Flamengo v Fuminese BTTS Parlay odds 2.92 Newtown v Bala Town Home win Odds 2.62 Gl all
|
MickSlick13 | 2 |
|
|
1700 Gowran Park
Bid Adieu Back it each way
|
MickSlick13 | 1 |
|
|
Nothing to obsess about, injuries to key players, suspensions, current form, are you kidding me.
I'm out of here gl in your endeavours
|
NeymarPSG | 36 |
|
|
Suduva v FK Kauno Zalgiris
Over 2.5 Arsenal Kiev v FK Sumy Home win The double pays 1.98 Gl all
|
MickSlick13 | 1 |
|
|
Neymar ingredients you stated are paramount to succseful betting, gambling, trading whatever, the most important factors to soccer gambling are current form and team news, if you don't prioritise these 2 factors your screwed. I'm aware in some of the lower leagues this isn't possible and all you have is stats and form but there are so many resources on the net that enables you to make an informative decision that you should at worst be breaking even.
|
NeymarPSG | 36 |
|
|
I'm lucky enough to live in a country that allows you to bet on the exchanges, it makes life a lot easier. You need to find an edge, I'll give you an example. A few years ago reserve leagues were scrapped in Scotland and development leagues were created, now here's the kicker you are permitted to play up to 8 senior players in these so called development leagues in amongst 16,17 and 18 year olds. So if you pick your spots for example when a first team is playing on a Wednesday and their development team is playing on a Monday its highley unlikely they will be fielding many senior players in their development team as they will all be in the squad for Wednesday. Now if their opponents first team doesn't have a midweek fixture it's highly likely they will be fielding first team players that didn't get a run out the previous weekend such as players that didn't come off the bench, to coin the phrase men against boys. I have links to all the teams Twitter feeds for team news and when I see an advantage I hit it hard. Don't believe people don't make a living from gambling on soccer because that is a lie. Specialise in a country or a league find an edge and most importantly check team news. And a lot of people hate laying juice but that is where the money is. Yesterday Germany played Azerbaijan and over 2.5 goals was priced at 1.22 on the exchange and I hammered it, to be honest I would have been happy to hammer over 3.5 but I'm not a greedy man. Pick your spots folks and don't be scared to lay the juice.
|
NeymarPSG | 36 |
|
|
Can't see a draw with Netherlands needing a big win, should in theory be lots of goals with 2 attacking teams so unless your suggesting 3-3 or 4-4 I can't see draw in this one
|
clark17 | 3 |
|
|
Uruguay v Bolivia
Trinidad & Tobago v USA Over 2.5 goal double Uruguay host a Bolivian side with nothing to play for and are quite simply terrible on the road. I predict a blowout either 3-0 or 4-0. USA travel to T&T in a must win game and at full strength. With T&T more than capable of scoring and their last 6 games all going over I can see this game ending 1-2 or 1-3 The double pays 2.60 gl all
|
MickSlick13 | 1 |
|
|
replied to
I want a legitimate argument as to why someone is taking the Browns over the Jets...
in NFL Betting
Sorry Papa but I respectfully disagree, this is not Arrowhead or Mile High there is statistically no home field advantage in this matchup and as for "if the Jets were at home" is of no significance to how I capped this game that is for another day. I looked at this match up before the lines were released and I never invisaged the Jets as the dog.
|
scalabrine | 135 |
|
|
replied to
I want a legitimate argument as to why someone is taking the Browns over the Jets...
in NFL Betting
Sorry Papa but I'm not sure where I contradicted myself and why would the line be -9 if played in New York, you state this like the Browns have home field advantage, I believe they have won 2 of their last 17 home games. If you would kindly entertain me please give my one statistical edge the Browns have in this game aside from personal opinion.
|
scalabrine | 135 |
|
|
replied to
I want a legitimate argument as to why someone is taking the Browns over the Jets...
in NFL Betting
How do people see this as a good spot for the Browns. One thing that I have noted is they have declined overall as a unit all aspects and that includes coaching since week 1 whereas the Jets have made the required adjustments and have improved. The Browns have a nonexistent run game whereas the Jets have shown an improvement, Kizer is completing 51.4% and McCowen is completing over 70%. Yes the Jets beat 2 bad teams in the Dolphins and the Jags but the Browns lost to 2 bad teams in the Bengals and the Colts. The Browns should be getting at least 3 points, this line is wrong and should move accordingly come game time. This is not a good spot for the Browns
|
scalabrine | 135 |
|
|
replied to
I want a legitimate argument as to why someone is taking the Browns over the Jets...
in NFL Betting
The Browns are the worst team period and have been for some time, they constantly find ways to lose games. The very least the Jets come in to this game with back to back wins, surely this counts for something regardless of who they played they have shown us they can win. Who in their right mind would back the Browns -1, why would you back a team with no backbone, a team that has won 1 game in its last 23. AND YOUR GETTING MINUS POINTS. Even if they cover this week it's a bad pick, as soon as the lines came out and I saw Browns -1 my initial reaction was to laugh and my 2nd was to take the Jets. Kizer has been thrown in at the deep end and is having a tough time turning the ball over 9 times and with very little support I can't see this changing any time soon. Now I'm not saying McCowen is a world beater far from it but the very least he has shown us he can win a game so for me it's the Jets and that's purely based on the fact that the Browns are the worst team by a long way and there isn't a single positive aspect in that team that can remotely sway my decision, if someone can highlight one I'm all ears so take the Jets +1 because the Browns shouldn't be giving any team points
|
scalabrine | 135 |
|
|
1-1 sets and 3-2 up in games and serving
|
finsterbaby | 93 |
|
|
Well done Fin seriously unbelievable form, much appreciated
|
finsterbaby | 65 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.