Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Does anyone feel like a west coast team playing at 1pm on the east coast has a poor chance?
Atlanta might be having a bad year but it's still Atlanta.... feedback anyone?
|
Covers | 32 |
|
|
Welcome back Fox. This will be a good season for all of us.
|
Jfox6546 | 56 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jtoler: Small 50 dollar wager on EWU at -1.5, Ill be on the other side at the half. thats two units on my book.
|
NcaaBBCapper | 21 |
|
|
Excellent run. Back to handicapping with great results.
|
NcaaBBCapper | 21 |
|
|
Got one unit at the Half on Iona -7.5 and one unit to the game -12.5
|
NcaaBBCapper | 31 |
|
|
Syracuse, money in the bag!
On to Rider.
|
NcaaBBCapper | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NcaaBBCapper: USF will hang around for a bit simply based on their half court offense. They burn 27-30 secs per possession. However, once they start fading and realize they`re 8 down Syr should pull away.... Well, I got them at the half -5.5 and to cover the game at -9.5. I have not play your games in a sometimes. But I liked Cuse a lot after reading your comments. Thanks.
|
NcaaBBCapper | 30 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Jfox6546: Happy new year! Bol! I want to wish you and yours health, happiness, prosperity, and much deserved success in 2013. HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!! |
Jfox6546 | 111 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Jfox6546: Sunday Night Play $500 Washington Redskins -3 How can I not bet against the Cowboys when they are 2-10, the last 12 years in week 17 SU. Their defense had been horrid and they are on the road against a powerful offense. I'll make Romo and company prove to me that they can win a big game like this. Until then, I have to lay the fg here with the skins. Redskins will prolly get an early lead and the cowboys will attempt to make a late comeback like always. I actually think this may be a little lower scoring than most people think, then again I won't be surprised if both teams get torched in the second half. Hail to the Redskins, lay the FG with them at home. Skins win 26-20. Romo threw for a career-high 4,903 yards this season, but also matched a career worst with 19 INTs. Now 1-6 lifetime in elimination games.
|
Jfox6546 | 80 |
|
|
in with Syracuse at a MAX bet. Thank you Fox
|
Jfox6546 | 194 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by yoyojonas: im done with bowl games......duke, UL-M, Rutgers, i was on all of those.....crappy money management on my part and I cant sustain a losing streak depleted my bankroll God Damn it!!!!! I'm on the same FCKNG boat, Duke, Rutgers, BG! I want to take Fox's Syracuse pick, still debating.
|
Jfox6546 | 194 |
|
|
God Fcking Damn it!!!!
Three games, two days!!!! This inexplicable for Satan's friggin Sake!!!! And this guy missed the tying field goal!!!!! 40-Fckn-2 yard attempt Rutgers seemed like the easiest pick of them all and they just gave it away. Damn It!!! |
Jfox6546 | 194 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by combato: To follow up on the UCLA Baylor game - The line has moved all the way to UCLA -3 which affects my original analysis of UCLA Pick em for 1 unit. I think the best play now is to pass the game because there at least 10 or 11 really good plays coming up over the next week so there is no reason to play a favorite on a game that is less than optimal at the current line. This is clearly a steam play on UCLA and would have been a solid play at Pick 'em but I am not as confident laying 3 or more points against a wide open offense like Baylor. If you HAVE to play the game, UCLA is probably the better pick but no more than -3. Personally, I am passing and waiting for tomorrow's games. Good call staying away. I did after losing BG and Duke in inexplicable fashion.
|
Covers | 45 |
|
|
God Damn It!!!!!!
What a friggin loss today. Unbelievable! Inexplicable! God Damn It!!!! Fox you made three good bowl calls today. Kudos to you for the work you man. Keep it up and looking forward to your next picks. No friggin way in hell anyone could've capped what happened in the first two games. Especially friggin Duke!!! darn DUKE!!!! |
Jfox6546 | 194 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by combato: MAC is probably overrated but I don;t think it matters when they are playing lower echelon west coast teams since the quality of opposition is roughly equivalent. I track several criteria and as of today, the BG dog looks like a play ( my numbers have them winning it SU by 17 -14 score - 3 pt margin ). Consensus numbers at SI are on SJS by 65% which also suggests a medium play on BG. BG also has one of the best sack % / pass attempts in FBS which means they can really get after the QB. Even good QB's become very average when facing pressure defenses which is what BG will bring. BG for a medium to large play at +7. I like the analysis on this game. I already took the the under in this and now going for the parlay. BG +9.5 & BG U44.5 |
Covers | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by combato: My numbers make this game UCLA 51 vs Baylor 42 which seems reasonable. UCLA can actually pressure the QB and Baylor cannot which makes the UCLA the likely winner if they can only get 3-4 stops during the game. Also, consensus numbers are virtually 50/50 and would not indicate a public side yet but I would not be surprised to see either side get the public money before game time. My scoring numbers and UCLA sack % makes UCLA a 1 unit play unless something changes before game time such as a rush of steam money on Baylor right before kick off. i like your analysis, would you post your lean again tomorrow closer to game time?
|
Covers | 45 |
|
|
|
NcaaBBCapper | 12 |
|
|
R
|
NcaaBBCapper | 12 |
|
|
How about AZ St -3 at TXTCH?
Sun Devils have a good chance even playing as visitors. any thoughts.
|
NcaaBBCapper | 9 |
|
|
Wassup Capper?
Would go with Providence -3 at Boston College? I'm leaning to Prov today. They seem to beat opponents comfortably. Have you capped this team this year.
|
NcaaBBCapper | 9 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.