Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Love this forum. Laughed so hard I coudn't speak or eat. I don't know any of these guys but it brings back memories of Rudy's Leather Goods which didn't sell a thing except chance and the Bainbridge Academy of Billiards. They both were up in the Bronx and people always spent their time arguing while I learned basic billiards. I left New York when Joe Bonanno's family left just ahead of a hail of lead. I was a gambler not an assassin but mistakes could and were made.
Anyway great thread. PS Nothing like betting a game and going to Yankee Stadium to watch your money grow! |
ATLGettinPaper | 96 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ebelisle22: topshelf u r a pu s sy Ebel, You sound like a twelve year old. You think cursing out people makes a good case? If we were in a public place like a bar you would just sit muted or quietly leave but since we are on the net you think you can be a faux tough guy. If only you were intelligent enough to read your words you would go head back to high school to learn sentence structure but I fear that ship has sailed. |
KobezKing | 61 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Skubishack:
Tampa Bay -1.5 Reverse PL (+330) at NYRangers TB Sucked... lost 1-4 to the Rags. Toronto -1.5 reverse PL +320 at NYIslanders Leafs blew a 4-2 lead but did win 5 to 4 in OT. Leafs Reverse PL backers got burned. Ottawa +173 at Boston OTT had more than enough chances and lost on a goal that spent all of just a split second over the goalline in OT. Ottawa (60 mins Only) -0.5 (+269) at Boston Ottawa -1.5 Reverse PL +478 at Boston Pittsburgh at Carolina (60 Mins Only) -0.5 (+193) Canes give up 1st goal then put the hammer down on Pens the rest of the way. Pittsburgh at Carolina -1.5 Reverse PL +330 Canes win 4-1 as a home doggie. New Jersey at Winnipeg -1.5 PL +260 Jets did exactly what I thought they would do... Right down to an EN goal for the PL winner. Chicago at St.Louis EACH are -1.5 PL for +260 Hawks -1.5 PL backers were rewarded bigtime. Edmonton -1.5 Reverse PL +350 at Dallas Oilers SMOKED the Dallas Stars by a 5-1 score in Dallas. Minnesota -1.5 Reverse PL +320 at Phoenix The Wild BLEW leads of 3-0 and 4-1 but still won the game by a 4-3 score... It just blew a nice reverse PL win if you backed the Wild with that line. Detroit +145 at San JoseWings beat Sharks in a shootout by a 2-1 score. Detroit -1.5 Reverse PL +383 at San JosePlenty of chances for both teams in this game... just no results, i, e, no goals. If you played all these lines... For the day... These lines went... 5-7-1 for a PLUS +578... (I'm counting the CHI-STL game as a push since the line went either way and only a nut would have bet both PL's.) A sweet +578 for a losing record day... Now That's JUICY..!!!!!!! I hope some of you played some of these winners. Now that is value. Nice work
|
Skubishack | 17 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mikeru3: Get money!!!! More to come soon. This is silly. There is zero value.Same as Clippers M.L.vs Cleveland. Bet it if you like but if you lose one out of four of these kind of bets you are down money that's why I don't see the value. Am I missing something? G.L. anyway. |
mikeru3 | 26 |
|
|
Any particular reason for the pick or is it a hunch?
|
ogkush | 2 |
|
|
Also on Maryland!!
|
accventures | 22 |
|
|
Not going to be a hater but I will fade this waste of time. His record sucks so why jump through hoops to get below average picks?
|
PitchBlack2011 | 75 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Osirus13: Is there permanently a booker on Clemson? Think he meant "looker" on the Clemson women's team. |
accventures | 22 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TsikenBreast: apparently it is a home and home for detroit and indiana. the pacers whooped the heck out of the pistons 114-82 last night. they are playing them again tonight against the same lowly detroit team. no way they are going to get any better overnight. indiana should trash the same team again. but then again, why on earth is indiana only laying 3. Pistons +3 Just to make sure are you picking Detroit which is now +4. Sounded like you were making a case for Indiana. |
TsikenBreast | 27 |
|
|
I got Ducks -107 at 5 dimes.
|
oli_renaud91 | 29 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Moneycash: I NEED SOME REAL HELP, I CAN CONTINUE LOSE MY MONEY, I FEEL SO BAD. I REALLY NEED SOME HELPPPPPPPPP :( When that happens to me I stop capping. I can hardly look at the stats and betting gets me sick. So either take a week off or follow someone unconditionally for one bet daily,just for a little action. You win great,if you lose you will find misery loves company.The laws of probability will soon kick back in and things will be back to normal. |
Moneycash | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KingRGIII: Very witty. He deserves it just for saying he always buys up the half point. That can get very expensive if you bet any kind of substantial sums.How did that work out for you sherlock homeslice? I wonder if the public just looks at the records or did they know that Syracuse was stretched very thin by injuries and suspensions. For me the public is not a capping factor. |
sherlockpierce | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Teaser78: PITT OR INDIANA PUT THE HOUSE ON IT .. THANK ME LATER Don't really understand what Moneycash is doing. You need to find value not give the books value.Allow me to thank you for Pitt. On the surface Syracuse seemed a winner but with the suspensions and/or injuries they are going to lose. Thanks again. |
Moneycash | 6 |
|
|
Train,I admire your patience.
QUOTE Originally Posted by CoverLane:You say $8 is not a risk? Any bet anyone ever makes is a risk. Maybe if you actually bet your plays you would realize this. Keep posting your one-sided, biased arguments that shape your horrendous plays. End of discussion TRAIN. It is Coverlane who seems a bit slow.We get that you don't like Train's plays. Your posts are redundant and add nothing to the thread.You are extremely boring and it's folks like you that have driven me to post elsewhere. If you are a high school kid it would explain a lot. Finally CoverLane I would add this,you do have a lot of class but all of it is low. |
TRAIN69 | 252 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by snagmypick: Ok with Baseball and Ok with NCAA tourney..I did come up with a chase system in Baseball that went 115-1 last year but not sure if it's a fluke. I'm sure there are many more cappers out there that are much better than I..Since I'm playing with house money on NCAAB I'm in a testing phase trying new things out when making these latest picks. Would not advise tailing me on these picks at this time unless you see a roll going. Do you expect anyone to believe you went 115-1? Unless you bet pennies you would be a multi millionaire.What's the use? You just waste everyone's time. That's what I love (hate) about this site. |
snagmypick | 458 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SportsFreak69:
Vancouver -165 That's some risky pick. It is now -170 which makes it seem valueless to me. Would you really put up $170 to win $100. I don't see huge favorites as smart bets but I will be rooting for you.It is not a personal thing, just a difference in philosophy. Let's get the |
SportsFreak69 | 25 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NBA_Fanatic: Great ending in Memphis. Kinda shocked they called that foul to put George Hill on the foul line. Regardless its a win, 1-1 on the day so far. Thought you had the Hornets and the Pacers? I tailed you and won and for that I thank you. I guess it really is none of my business how you ended up 1-1. You are a very sound capper. |
NBA_Fanatic | 66 |
|
|
[Quote: Originally Posted by NBA_Fanatic]
See what I mean about that Kings "Defense"....64 point for the Hornets in the first half!
Yes I do. Without that knowledge,which I lacked, I would never have made that bet. I guess you won on both your early game bets. Nice bit of capping. I am impressed! As of today I will follow you on Twitter. |
NBA_Fanatic | 66 |
|
|
thanks,thanks and thanks again.Makes a lot of sense.
|
NBA_Fanatic | 66 |
|
|
Why the Hornets lean ?They are 6-14 at home.Sac is also bad but you are giving up -6.
I admit I am a B-ball neophyte so I am asking this with all due respect to a fanatic..By the way I saw this on your Twitter feed and I did like Indiana. |
NBA_Fanatic | 66 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.