Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Zona
|
NYY928 | 7 |
|
|
If I knew Smith was only gonna make it through quarter I would still go Smith over Spiller, and I think he at least makes it through the first half. Spiller has had one good game all year. Same can be said about Smith of course but he's only been active for a few weeks. Plus, the Raiders give up a lot to RB's.
|
TLtheKIDDnj | 7 |
|
|
in a non ppr league.. this is so tough. I feel that Sproles may be a slightly safer play because Minn-NO is projected to be high scoring and it would be unusual for Brees to not hit Sproles on a handful of short passes. The Vikings are bad against the pass -- I'm not sure if that directly applies to short passes out of the backfield but I am thinking it does. Sproles could absolutely victimize that defense. I am thinking Bradshaw may have more upside. I would be surprised if the Giants offense is not clicking tomorrow and from all indications Bradshaw's injury is not holding him back too much. He has had more huge fantasy days in his career than Sproles and I think he has a better chance of getting in the endzone than Sproles tomorrow. But on the other hand, there is risk. I'm not a doctor but I'm thinking there is a chance he aggravates the foot injury. I would bet he makes it through the game fine but it's something to consider. Sproles is 100% healthy as usual. The Redskins will not lay down in this division game -- Bradshaw will have to earn every yard. I can' t make up my mind on this. |
Ham14 | 1 |
|
|
do you have a pick for tonight?
|
KScapping | 1035 |
|
|
like |
FlipsideRM | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by statfreak:
they are not secret sources... the world was on SF... and of course that line was begging for SF money and they got it, everyone was in love with the 49ers at that point(prob still are, they good)... that line opened at -4.5 and closed at -3.5 in most places.
https://www.covers.com/sports/odds/linehistory.aspx?eventId=29503&sport=nfl only place it opened 4.5 was the Hilton. Average the moves reported by Covers and the line didn't really move either way. |
KScapping | 207 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KScapping:
last one to you Sir....public was riding SF (that is from the 4 sources I check/follow) and to a larger than average %.... could it be that it was opposite of that in the betting world as a whole..I suppose anything is possible even if I have yet to ever see it...but then again I never seen a pig fly either, but would not bet my life that it cannot happen.... now run along son... try using your mind for some productive means as opposed to spending your life hoping to discredit someone or spew negativity....shuuu shuuuu LOL. Not being negative or trying to discredit you.. I was just interested to know what kind of sources you had leading you to believe the public was on San Fran. But I'm sure those sources are top secret so there's nothing more for us to talk about. Just seemed weird to me to conclude the public would be on a 3 or 3.5 pt dog traveling across country to play against a division leader. You could be right though.. GL on fading the public in the future and I look forward to your picks. |
KScapping | 207 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KScapping:
I am actually getting tired of fielding questions on this thread lol....no... action was heavy on San Fran so naturally the line was creeping towards Ravens side.... the books would have taken a bath if the niners would have won .....
so you're saying there was reverse line movement on that game? I'm curious as to what your basis is for this theory. My books actually moved the line the other way leading up to kickoff.. the 9ers ML odds got shorter. |
KScapping | 207 |
|
|
KScapping, were you saying the books wanted San Fran action on that Thanksgiving Day game? I agree with everything in your original post I was just a little confused about what you were saying about that game... the line was 3.5 and the Ravens covered.. So the public was on San Fran? I actually had a pretty big bet on San Fran, and I remember thinking that the line looked like the books wanted Ravens money. At the book I use the line was -3, with heavy juice on the Ravens... taking the Ravens seemed like such an obvious play. They are obviously a strong team this year and the game was in Baltimore. If they wanted San Fran money wouldn't they make the line -4 or -5?
|
KScapping | 207 |
|
|
|
MVP702 | 109 |
|
|
Can someone explain to me why it is so risky for an NFL quarterback to shave points? Yes they would stand to lose a lot if they were somehow exposed.. but how in the world would they get exposed? If Rivers has a friend he trusts with this life, who also happens to be someone who Vegas sportsbooks will book huge bets for... then how exactly does this plan break down? It's hard to trust that nothing like this goes on when all it takes is one fumbled snap to change the entire outcome of a game. it could never be proven he fumbled the snap on purpose.. the only way the player gets caught is if the guy who placed the bet for him stabs him in the back and testifies in court. I don't see any other way the player gets caught. |
MVP702 | 109 |
|
|
If you had to bet your life, who will have bigger stats this week between Decker, D Jackson and V Jackson? This thread belongs in the fantasy forum but there is not much activity in that forum and I really need to reach a decision on this in the next few hours. I have a weird feeling Desean will have a big game tonight but it's splitting hairs between these 3 players from a fantasy perspective. |
Ham14 | 1 |
|
|
TheDesertFox, what do you mean by "still waiting for it to hit my account." Wire transfers are not a payout option for anyone, but even if they were you couldn't do one for less than $2500. Are you waiting on a check?
|
MikeMed | 285 |
|
|
Is it illegal to do legit work for such a site, such as website design or marketing? bodog, for instance, is a real company. Are they not allowed to send money to an individual in the USA? The checks do not say "gambling proceeds."
|
CobraKai | 57 |
|
|
that sucks man. the bank released the funds from my bodog check on tuesday. If I were you I would walk into your bank and demand to know what the hell is going on. If it's a bad check they should tell you, if it's a good check they should cash it, and if anything else is going on they should tell you. to just keep it in limbo and tell you nothing is ridiculous.
|
CobraKai | 57 |
|
|
This is going to be a statement game.
|
Ham14 | 5 |
|
|
umm bump
|
Ham14 | 5 |
|
|
I'd like to see some discussion on this game. -6.5 is what I'm seeing... this game could be a blowout. UK has more talent than I have ever seen on a college team. I might give Kansas an edge in the backcourt but they will have a real hard time scoring on UK inside. Davis, Jones and Kidd-Gilchrist will be way too much for KU to handle. UK -6.5, definitely my biggest play so far in this bball season.
|
Ham14 | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DrewSinatra:
I would avoid Bodog, by all measures. They issued me four checks with insufficient funds within the past 2 months. One recently just cleared. the other three are still pending. It's been over two months and I'm left paying bank fees. Bodog is becoming increasingly weaker in the U.S. for a multitude of reasons. One being U.S. government cracking down, two is the influx of local bookies popping up. Don't listen to this person Blowjob Becky trying to assure everyone is okay with BODOG. Bodog is losing customers rapidly in the US which is why the marketing is being transferred to Europe. Those shady Canadians are running the full operation now. My advice is leave now or Max out your credit card and if you lose report it stolen with fraudulent charges. I have been gambling with them for over 8 years, even obtained the status of VIP (whole different number and everything), been offered multiple sports tickets to events, and yet they still treat me like shit when I want to collect my earnings. Bodog use to be a well reputed company because of their payouts which is one everyone stayed amid the shitty spreads. Again, leave fast and collect now. I highly doubt I will get all four checks cleared. Also note, Mohawk gaming own several of these online sportbooks, so pay close attention. P.S. Blowjob Becky, I already fucked your company out of 4k with me disputing my credit card. Wait till the U.S. passes online gaming, your ass will lose your job!
How about an update on those checks.. you received four checks that bounced? What do you mean "one just recently cleared"? How does it bounce and then just recently clear? Does Bodog still owe you money? |
MikeMed | 285 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vnguyen1904:
That is the biggest lie ever. You guys call fake checks a payout? That is what you guys sent me when I cashed out $1,300. Failed to resolve issues. Thus making claims through CC company and got the funds back. Bodog is a fraud.
what funds did you get back? some deposits you made with your credit card? Did you try to deposit the fake check? |
MikeMed | 285 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.