Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
replied to
NUGGETS @ LAKERS: It's the 'Ol Trusty "The Oscarsa and Grammys take over the Staples Center" angle!
in NBA Betting
Nuggets ML -110
Nuggets 116-115 ? That seems legit to me
|
scalabrine | 54 |
|
|
#WTATaipei
Minella +355 (half)
Minella +5 (half)
Minella +1,5 set (half)
Peng +110
Svitolina/Nara -119
Stosur/Safarova -103
#WTA
Kuznetsova to finish parley
Vinci +115
Mladenovic +165 (half)
Leaning toward Vekic but line not out on all my books so waiting.
|
ChatonSports | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DrKnoNothing: Dammmmmmnnnnnn cung sorry for your huge play loss . just make your next play triple unit at 75 units or 100 units and hit that and if you miss again make the next pick 200 if that loses make it 400 units if that fails make it a 1k units if that fails you will probably be broke. Lmao. I truly hope that does not happen have more discipline. And if it loses again make it a 2000 unit play. Easy life. GG bookmaker
|
chungnuoc | 93 |
|
|
replied to
This hard for me to share...being a big Patriots fan, but needs to be shown
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by Nycgags: I've used it in multiple games with a high degree of success, if you wish to prove me wrong other than spouting off your mouth, feel free to instead of making demands. You are the one making a statement without any proof or argument outside 1 game. But its the poeple who have to come up with proofs that you re wrong ? Good joke. Done here
|
Nycgags | 32 |
|
|
Stan -140
Venus +111 Zverev +2,5 set +126 (Half) Coco/Muguruza U22 -109 (Half)
|
ChatonSports | 2 |
|
|
replied to
This hard for me to share...being a big Patriots fan, but needs to be shown
in NFL Betting
Ok then 43. Fair enough. Can I sell you the Under ?
|
Nycgags | 32 |
|
|
replied to
This hard for me to share...being a big Patriots fan, but needs to be shown
in NFL Betting
Total at 43 ?
Did you watch the games yesterday ? They put 80 points on the board in 8 quarters. 43,5 could be covered by one team if thing go wild Must be a joke....Total is set at 58. I'm leaning the U here. But hey...I've been colder than antartica those playoff so who know
|
Nycgags | 32 |
|
|
Gotta need that fix
|
TheSquare | 5 |
|
|
Bacsinzsky ML +130 4U Ferrer ML +169 2U Gasquet ML +137 4U Vesnina ML + Kohlschreiber +2,5 set +122 3U
|
ChatonSports | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jvarghese: Record? Around -8U for the Aussie so far. Around +5U if you take IN-PLAY betting into consideration. Nothing big since my usual bet is 4U. Good Luck
|
ChatonSports | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: Achillies. This is not 5th grade mathematics so let's be honest. The QB is the most important position on the field. To make the 4.5% proclamation results in an immediate loss of credibility. It's just not good capping. Anyone with any intelligence that reads this 4.5% nonsense will lose respect for whatever else you say. |
Achilles1629 | 68 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629: What's 1 out of 22? About 4.5%..... Apparently one player is the sole reason to back a player with many GB backers... 1 out of 22 players considering 11 play versus 11 on a football field, equals 4.5%. Right? No? Am i in the Twilight Zone here? Yikes Well done for being able to enter 1/22 into a calculator. Very clever. That would be a valid argument if every player on the field had the same important. Which is not the case here. But nice try
|
Achilles1629 | 68 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by rm990: Yup. He lost me with the "Rodgers makes up 4.5% of the number" comment. I'm on Atlanta this week but not because of that. Obviously he's the most impactful player on the field in regard to the point spread. Hell, the spread is probably only affected by 2 guys in the game (Ryan). Shhhhhhh !!! Dont tell the dummy how dummy he sound !! It's a secret
|
Achilles1629 | 68 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629: PEOPLE WHO SEE THIS CHAT DUDE, THIS IS A MUST : I'm not a genius here but if you are coming in here the way you have, you are getting called out buddy especially without doing YOUR HOMEWORK. YOUR DIVISIONAL ROUND went like this: 2 first half bets on totals = 0-2 Totals = 0-2 Spreads/ML = 1-3 Record = 1-7...... Again, I used to be brash but these past months, it's all about business and gaining insight. I try to be a good person and a nice guy but CHAT when you come at me like your stuff doesn't stink and you don't do your background checks on others, I'm gonna call u out. I needed to repeat that. I see you bro. I understand what you are all about. Done and done. I hope others do too. You very well could win these ganes this weekend but after what I found in your short existence, if I'm on the OTHER SIDE OF you, I think my chances to be successful are pretty high. Sad I wasted my time here but again, don't come into someone's thread and be an a $$ having the track record you do. Nuf said I'm still not sure what make you look the more like a dummy. 1) Your (yet again) multi paragraph post. 2) You believing a 4 games card over 1 weekend can tell if a capper is ROI +/- One thing is for sure....Every time you press that submit button you doesnt help yourself....
|
Achilles1629 | 68 |
|
|
BROWN = B+R+O+W+N = 72
BRADY = B+R+A+D+Y = 50 72/3.1416 = 22.91 50/3.1416 = 15.91 Final Score: PIT 23-16 NE Where is your god now ?
|
usarmy69-71 | 25 |
|
|
I like it
|
Mangowoman | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629: Just trying to help you out. It's me just doing my good deed for the day CHAT. You seem to need some assistance so I took some time. As for your insight, you've offered nothing. You are here to ruffle feathers and be a pud. It's becoming a regular thing on covers I guess. You fit in well with those 41 posts bud. Well done. I'm done now, promise. Still waiting for your post stating I got 45 now
|
Achilles1629 | 68 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629: Just trying to help you out. It's me just doing my good deed for the day CHAT. You seem to need some assistance so I took some time. As for your insight, you've offered nothing. You are here to ruffle feathers and be a pud. It's becoming a regular thing on covers I guess. You fit in well with those 41 posts bud. Well done. I'm done now, promise. Well sir, We can now tell you can count from 35 to 41. Since you havent done anything else than keeping my post count. It tell me you havent alot to say ?
|
Achilles1629 | 68 |
|
|
replied to
Regardless of what happens... why on earth is anyone betting under in Atlanta
in NFL Betting
Remember me about Flyers/Pens a few years ago in the playoffs where totals were books were setting the total around 7,5 but the Over kept hitting game after game
Still...I'm leaning the U60 here. Havent locked anything here yet. Might pass
|
bpickin | 46 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by anaheimRX: Regarding the SBR Consensus, can we take that to be accurate? I always check that site when capping, but why would the books provide that information? I understand they will provide the # of bets made on each side in terms of %, but the total $ wagered seems like info they wouldn't want to disclose. Remember me of some sportsbook who tweet everyday about where they got the Sharp Action.
|
Achilles1629 | 68 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.